Effects of linear versus sigmoid coding of visual or audio biofeedback for the control of upright stance

Marco Dozza, Lorenzo Chiari, Frantisek Hlavacka, Angelo Cappello, Fay Horak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although both visual and audio biofeedback (BF) systems for postural control can reduce sway during stance, a direct comparison between the two systems has never been done. Further, comparing different coding designs of audio and visual BF may help in elucidating how BF information is integrated in the control of posture, and may improve knowledge for the design of innovative BF systems for postural control. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effects of linear versus sigmoid coding of trunk acceleration for audio and visual BF on postural sway in a group of eight, healthy subjects while standing on a foam surface. Results showed that sigmoid-coded audio BF reduced sway acceleration more than did a linear-coded audio BF, whereas a linear-coded visual BF reduced sway acceleration more than a sigmoid-coded visual BF. In addition, audio BF had larger effects on reducing center of pressure (COP) displacement whereas visual BF had larger effects on reducing trunk sway. These results suggest that audio and visual BF for postural control benefit from different types of sensory coding and each type of BF may encourage a different type of postural sway strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number13
Pages (from-to)505-512
Number of pages8
JournalIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Biofeedback
Sigmoid Colon
Posture
Healthy Volunteers
Pressure

Keywords

  • Accelerometer
  • Acoustic and visual feedback
  • Balance
  • Center of pressure
  • Postural control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics
  • Bioengineering
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Effects of linear versus sigmoid coding of visual or audio biofeedback for the control of upright stance. / Dozza, Marco; Chiari, Lorenzo; Hlavacka, Frantisek; Cappello, Angelo; Horak, Fay.

In: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 4, 13, 12.2006, p. 505-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{873469ce8f9045afb10434d1b9a4d68a,
title = "Effects of linear versus sigmoid coding of visual or audio biofeedback for the control of upright stance",
abstract = "Although both visual and audio biofeedback (BF) systems for postural control can reduce sway during stance, a direct comparison between the two systems has never been done. Further, comparing different coding designs of audio and visual BF may help in elucidating how BF information is integrated in the control of posture, and may improve knowledge for the design of innovative BF systems for postural control. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effects of linear versus sigmoid coding of trunk acceleration for audio and visual BF on postural sway in a group of eight, healthy subjects while standing on a foam surface. Results showed that sigmoid-coded audio BF reduced sway acceleration more than did a linear-coded audio BF, whereas a linear-coded visual BF reduced sway acceleration more than a sigmoid-coded visual BF. In addition, audio BF had larger effects on reducing center of pressure (COP) displacement whereas visual BF had larger effects on reducing trunk sway. These results suggest that audio and visual BF for postural control benefit from different types of sensory coding and each type of BF may encourage a different type of postural sway strategy.",
keywords = "Accelerometer, Acoustic and visual feedback, Balance, Center of pressure, Postural control",
author = "Marco Dozza and Lorenzo Chiari and Frantisek Hlavacka and Angelo Cappello and Fay Horak",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1109/TNSRE.2006.886732",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "505--512",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering",
issn = "1534-4320",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of linear versus sigmoid coding of visual or audio biofeedback for the control of upright stance

AU - Dozza, Marco

AU - Chiari, Lorenzo

AU - Hlavacka, Frantisek

AU - Cappello, Angelo

AU - Horak, Fay

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Although both visual and audio biofeedback (BF) systems for postural control can reduce sway during stance, a direct comparison between the two systems has never been done. Further, comparing different coding designs of audio and visual BF may help in elucidating how BF information is integrated in the control of posture, and may improve knowledge for the design of innovative BF systems for postural control. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effects of linear versus sigmoid coding of trunk acceleration for audio and visual BF on postural sway in a group of eight, healthy subjects while standing on a foam surface. Results showed that sigmoid-coded audio BF reduced sway acceleration more than did a linear-coded audio BF, whereas a linear-coded visual BF reduced sway acceleration more than a sigmoid-coded visual BF. In addition, audio BF had larger effects on reducing center of pressure (COP) displacement whereas visual BF had larger effects on reducing trunk sway. These results suggest that audio and visual BF for postural control benefit from different types of sensory coding and each type of BF may encourage a different type of postural sway strategy.

AB - Although both visual and audio biofeedback (BF) systems for postural control can reduce sway during stance, a direct comparison between the two systems has never been done. Further, comparing different coding designs of audio and visual BF may help in elucidating how BF information is integrated in the control of posture, and may improve knowledge for the design of innovative BF systems for postural control. The purpose of this paper is to compare the effects of linear versus sigmoid coding of trunk acceleration for audio and visual BF on postural sway in a group of eight, healthy subjects while standing on a foam surface. Results showed that sigmoid-coded audio BF reduced sway acceleration more than did a linear-coded audio BF, whereas a linear-coded visual BF reduced sway acceleration more than a sigmoid-coded visual BF. In addition, audio BF had larger effects on reducing center of pressure (COP) displacement whereas visual BF had larger effects on reducing trunk sway. These results suggest that audio and visual BF for postural control benefit from different types of sensory coding and each type of BF may encourage a different type of postural sway strategy.

KW - Accelerometer

KW - Acoustic and visual feedback

KW - Balance

KW - Center of pressure

KW - Postural control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846268461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846268461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TNSRE.2006.886732

DO - 10.1109/TNSRE.2006.886732

M3 - Article

C2 - 17190042

AN - SCOPUS:33846268461

VL - 14

SP - 505

EP - 512

JO - IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

JF - IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

SN - 1534-4320

IS - 4

M1 - 13

ER -