Effects of extreme tonotopic mismatches between bilateral cochlear implants on electric pitch perception

A case study

Lina Reiss, Mary W. Lowder, Sue A. Karsten, Christopher W. Turner, Bruce J. Gantz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Recent studies suggest that pitch perceived through cochlear implants (CIs) changes with experience to minimize spectral mismatches between electric and acoustic hearing. This study aimed to test whether perceived spectral mismatches are similarly minimized between two electric inputs. Design: Pitch perception was studied in a subject with a 10-mm CI in one ear and a 24-mm CI in the other ear. Both processors were programmed to allocate information from the same frequency range of 188-7938 Hz, despite the large differences in putative insertion depth and stimulated cochlear locations between the CIs. Results: After 2 and 3 years of experience, pitch-matched electrode pairs between CIs were aligned closer to the processor-provided frequencies than to cochlear position. Conclusions: Pitch perception may have adapted to reduce perceived spectral discrepancies between bilateral CI inputs, despite 2-3 octave differences in tonotopic mapping.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)536-540
Number of pages5
JournalEar and Hearing
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Pitch Perception
Cochlear Implants
Cochlea
Ear
Acoustics
Hearing
Electrodes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Effects of extreme tonotopic mismatches between bilateral cochlear implants on electric pitch perception : A case study. / Reiss, Lina; Lowder, Mary W.; Karsten, Sue A.; Turner, Christopher W.; Gantz, Bruce J.

In: Ear and Hearing, Vol. 32, No. 4, 07.2011, p. 536-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reiss, Lina ; Lowder, Mary W. ; Karsten, Sue A. ; Turner, Christopher W. ; Gantz, Bruce J. / Effects of extreme tonotopic mismatches between bilateral cochlear implants on electric pitch perception : A case study. In: Ear and Hearing. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 4. pp. 536-540.
@article{ae451b7ee5a7470898cbb559ae01ba82,
title = "Effects of extreme tonotopic mismatches between bilateral cochlear implants on electric pitch perception: A case study",
abstract = "Objectives: Recent studies suggest that pitch perceived through cochlear implants (CIs) changes with experience to minimize spectral mismatches between electric and acoustic hearing. This study aimed to test whether perceived spectral mismatches are similarly minimized between two electric inputs. Design: Pitch perception was studied in a subject with a 10-mm CI in one ear and a 24-mm CI in the other ear. Both processors were programmed to allocate information from the same frequency range of 188-7938 Hz, despite the large differences in putative insertion depth and stimulated cochlear locations between the CIs. Results: After 2 and 3 years of experience, pitch-matched electrode pairs between CIs were aligned closer to the processor-provided frequencies than to cochlear position. Conclusions: Pitch perception may have adapted to reduce perceived spectral discrepancies between bilateral CI inputs, despite 2-3 octave differences in tonotopic mapping.",
author = "Lina Reiss and Lowder, {Mary W.} and Karsten, {Sue A.} and Turner, {Christopher W.} and Gantz, {Bruce J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820c81b0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "536--540",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of extreme tonotopic mismatches between bilateral cochlear implants on electric pitch perception

T2 - A case study

AU - Reiss, Lina

AU - Lowder, Mary W.

AU - Karsten, Sue A.

AU - Turner, Christopher W.

AU - Gantz, Bruce J.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Objectives: Recent studies suggest that pitch perceived through cochlear implants (CIs) changes with experience to minimize spectral mismatches between electric and acoustic hearing. This study aimed to test whether perceived spectral mismatches are similarly minimized between two electric inputs. Design: Pitch perception was studied in a subject with a 10-mm CI in one ear and a 24-mm CI in the other ear. Both processors were programmed to allocate information from the same frequency range of 188-7938 Hz, despite the large differences in putative insertion depth and stimulated cochlear locations between the CIs. Results: After 2 and 3 years of experience, pitch-matched electrode pairs between CIs were aligned closer to the processor-provided frequencies than to cochlear position. Conclusions: Pitch perception may have adapted to reduce perceived spectral discrepancies between bilateral CI inputs, despite 2-3 octave differences in tonotopic mapping.

AB - Objectives: Recent studies suggest that pitch perceived through cochlear implants (CIs) changes with experience to minimize spectral mismatches between electric and acoustic hearing. This study aimed to test whether perceived spectral mismatches are similarly minimized between two electric inputs. Design: Pitch perception was studied in a subject with a 10-mm CI in one ear and a 24-mm CI in the other ear. Both processors were programmed to allocate information from the same frequency range of 188-7938 Hz, despite the large differences in putative insertion depth and stimulated cochlear locations between the CIs. Results: After 2 and 3 years of experience, pitch-matched electrode pairs between CIs were aligned closer to the processor-provided frequencies than to cochlear position. Conclusions: Pitch perception may have adapted to reduce perceived spectral discrepancies between bilateral CI inputs, despite 2-3 octave differences in tonotopic mapping.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959859103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959859103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820c81b0

DO - 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820c81b0

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 536

EP - 540

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 4

ER -