Effects of conversational topic choice on outcomes of augmentative communication intervention for adults with aphasia

L. E. Fox, M. M. Sohlberg, Melanie Fried-Oken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few variables have been found to predict successful use of augmentative and alternative communication devices (AAC) by persons with aphasia. The present study used a single case alternating treatment design to test whether choice of conversational topic improved the ability of three adults with aphasia to use symbol-based communication aids in clinical dialogues with familiar and unfamiliar partners, and in natural environment conversations with family members and friends. Results showed that the youngest participant with most recent onset of aphasia benefited clinically from choice in communication aid training. However, the benefit of topic choice did not extend to natural environments. At home and in other natural environments, use of communication aids was dependent on multiple social and contextual factors. Findings of this study were interpreted using a model of human motivation that considers both personal and environmental influences on achievement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-200
Number of pages30
JournalAphasiology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Aphasia
speech disorder
Communication
communication
Aptitude
family member
Motivation
symbol
conversation
dialogue
Equipment and Supplies
human being
Augmentative Communication
ability
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology

Cite this

Effects of conversational topic choice on outcomes of augmentative communication intervention for adults with aphasia. / Fox, L. E.; Sohlberg, M. M.; Fried-Oken, Melanie.

In: Aphasiology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2001, p. 171-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{12aac0905c904bfc89e8a37b58a5c6cc,
title = "Effects of conversational topic choice on outcomes of augmentative communication intervention for adults with aphasia",
abstract = "Few variables have been found to predict successful use of augmentative and alternative communication devices (AAC) by persons with aphasia. The present study used a single case alternating treatment design to test whether choice of conversational topic improved the ability of three adults with aphasia to use symbol-based communication aids in clinical dialogues with familiar and unfamiliar partners, and in natural environment conversations with family members and friends. Results showed that the youngest participant with most recent onset of aphasia benefited clinically from choice in communication aid training. However, the benefit of topic choice did not extend to natural environments. At home and in other natural environments, use of communication aids was dependent on multiple social and contextual factors. Findings of this study were interpreted using a model of human motivation that considers both personal and environmental influences on achievement.",
author = "Fox, {L. E.} and Sohlberg, {M. M.} and Melanie Fried-Oken",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1080/02687040042000133",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "171--200",
journal = "Aphasiology",
issn = "0268-7038",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of conversational topic choice on outcomes of augmentative communication intervention for adults with aphasia

AU - Fox, L. E.

AU - Sohlberg, M. M.

AU - Fried-Oken, Melanie

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Few variables have been found to predict successful use of augmentative and alternative communication devices (AAC) by persons with aphasia. The present study used a single case alternating treatment design to test whether choice of conversational topic improved the ability of three adults with aphasia to use symbol-based communication aids in clinical dialogues with familiar and unfamiliar partners, and in natural environment conversations with family members and friends. Results showed that the youngest participant with most recent onset of aphasia benefited clinically from choice in communication aid training. However, the benefit of topic choice did not extend to natural environments. At home and in other natural environments, use of communication aids was dependent on multiple social and contextual factors. Findings of this study were interpreted using a model of human motivation that considers both personal and environmental influences on achievement.

AB - Few variables have been found to predict successful use of augmentative and alternative communication devices (AAC) by persons with aphasia. The present study used a single case alternating treatment design to test whether choice of conversational topic improved the ability of three adults with aphasia to use symbol-based communication aids in clinical dialogues with familiar and unfamiliar partners, and in natural environment conversations with family members and friends. Results showed that the youngest participant with most recent onset of aphasia benefited clinically from choice in communication aid training. However, the benefit of topic choice did not extend to natural environments. At home and in other natural environments, use of communication aids was dependent on multiple social and contextual factors. Findings of this study were interpreted using a model of human motivation that considers both personal and environmental influences on achievement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035103611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035103611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02687040042000133

DO - 10.1080/02687040042000133

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035103611

VL - 15

SP - 171

EP - 200

JO - Aphasiology

JF - Aphasiology

SN - 0268-7038

IS - 2

ER -