Effects of a Flexibility/Support Intervention on Work Performance: Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network

Jeremy W. Bray, Jesse M. Hinde, David J. Kaiser, Michael J. Mills, Georgia T. Karuntzos, Katie R. Genadek, Erin L. Kelly, Ellen E. Kossek, David Hurtado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the effects of a workplace initiative to reduce work–family conflict on employee performance. Design: A group-randomized multisite controlled experimental study with longitudinal follow-up. Setting: An information technology firm. Participants: Employees randomized to the intervention (n = 348) and control condition (n = 345). Intervention: An intervention, “Start. Transform. Achieve. Results.” to enhance employees’ control over their work time, to increase supervisors’ support for this change, and to increase employees’ and supervisors’ focus on results. Methods: We estimated the effect of the intervention on 9 self-reported employee performance measures using a difference-in-differences approach with generalized linear mixed models. Performance measures included actual and expected hours worked, absenteeism, and presenteeism. Results: This study found little evidence that an intervention targeting work–family conflict affected employee performance. The only significant effect of the intervention was an approximately 1-hour reduction in expected work hours. After Bonferroni correction, the intervention effect is marginally insignificant at 6 months and marginally significant at 12 and 18 months. Conclusion: The intervention reduced expected working time by 1 hour per week; effects on most other employee self-reported performance measures were statistically insignificant. When coupled with the other positive wellness and firm outcomes, this intervention may be useful for improving employee perceptions of increased access to personal time or personal wellness without sacrificing performance. The null effects on performance provide countervailing evidence to recent negative press on work–family and flex work initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Health Promotion
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Family Health
family work
flexibility
employee
health
performance
evidence
Absenteeism
Workplace
Longitudinal Studies
Linear Models
Technology
firm
Work Performance
absenteeism
Conflict (Psychology)
workplace
information technology

Keywords

  • field experiment
  • performance
  • productivity
  • supervisor support
  • well-being
  • workplace flexibility
  • workplace intervention
  • work–family conflict

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Effects of a Flexibility/Support Intervention on Work Performance : Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network. / Bray, Jeremy W.; Hinde, Jesse M.; Kaiser, David J.; Mills, Michael J.; Karuntzos, Georgia T.; Genadek, Katie R.; Kelly, Erin L.; Kossek, Ellen E.; Hurtado, David.

In: American Journal of Health Promotion, 01.01.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bray, Jeremy W. ; Hinde, Jesse M. ; Kaiser, David J. ; Mills, Michael J. ; Karuntzos, Georgia T. ; Genadek, Katie R. ; Kelly, Erin L. ; Kossek, Ellen E. ; Hurtado, David. / Effects of a Flexibility/Support Intervention on Work Performance : Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network. In: American Journal of Health Promotion. 2017.
@article{df0134b55fd1435f83390e59493c3d04,
title = "Effects of a Flexibility/Support Intervention on Work Performance: Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network",
abstract = "Purpose: To estimate the effects of a workplace initiative to reduce work–family conflict on employee performance. Design: A group-randomized multisite controlled experimental study with longitudinal follow-up. Setting: An information technology firm. Participants: Employees randomized to the intervention (n = 348) and control condition (n = 345). Intervention: An intervention, “Start. Transform. Achieve. Results.” to enhance employees’ control over their work time, to increase supervisors’ support for this change, and to increase employees’ and supervisors’ focus on results. Methods: We estimated the effect of the intervention on 9 self-reported employee performance measures using a difference-in-differences approach with generalized linear mixed models. Performance measures included actual and expected hours worked, absenteeism, and presenteeism. Results: This study found little evidence that an intervention targeting work–family conflict affected employee performance. The only significant effect of the intervention was an approximately 1-hour reduction in expected work hours. After Bonferroni correction, the intervention effect is marginally insignificant at 6 months and marginally significant at 12 and 18 months. Conclusion: The intervention reduced expected working time by 1 hour per week; effects on most other employee self-reported performance measures were statistically insignificant. When coupled with the other positive wellness and firm outcomes, this intervention may be useful for improving employee perceptions of increased access to personal time or personal wellness without sacrificing performance. The null effects on performance provide countervailing evidence to recent negative press on work–family and flex work initiatives.",
keywords = "field experiment, performance, productivity, supervisor support, well-being, workplace flexibility, workplace intervention, work–family conflict",
author = "Bray, {Jeremy W.} and Hinde, {Jesse M.} and Kaiser, {David J.} and Mills, {Michael J.} and Karuntzos, {Georgia T.} and Genadek, {Katie R.} and Kelly, {Erin L.} and Kossek, {Ellen E.} and David Hurtado",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0890117117696244",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
issn = "0890-1171",
publisher = "American Journal of Health Promotion",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of a Flexibility/Support Intervention on Work Performance

T2 - Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network

AU - Bray, Jeremy W.

AU - Hinde, Jesse M.

AU - Kaiser, David J.

AU - Mills, Michael J.

AU - Karuntzos, Georgia T.

AU - Genadek, Katie R.

AU - Kelly, Erin L.

AU - Kossek, Ellen E.

AU - Hurtado, David

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To estimate the effects of a workplace initiative to reduce work–family conflict on employee performance. Design: A group-randomized multisite controlled experimental study with longitudinal follow-up. Setting: An information technology firm. Participants: Employees randomized to the intervention (n = 348) and control condition (n = 345). Intervention: An intervention, “Start. Transform. Achieve. Results.” to enhance employees’ control over their work time, to increase supervisors’ support for this change, and to increase employees’ and supervisors’ focus on results. Methods: We estimated the effect of the intervention on 9 self-reported employee performance measures using a difference-in-differences approach with generalized linear mixed models. Performance measures included actual and expected hours worked, absenteeism, and presenteeism. Results: This study found little evidence that an intervention targeting work–family conflict affected employee performance. The only significant effect of the intervention was an approximately 1-hour reduction in expected work hours. After Bonferroni correction, the intervention effect is marginally insignificant at 6 months and marginally significant at 12 and 18 months. Conclusion: The intervention reduced expected working time by 1 hour per week; effects on most other employee self-reported performance measures were statistically insignificant. When coupled with the other positive wellness and firm outcomes, this intervention may be useful for improving employee perceptions of increased access to personal time or personal wellness without sacrificing performance. The null effects on performance provide countervailing evidence to recent negative press on work–family and flex work initiatives.

AB - Purpose: To estimate the effects of a workplace initiative to reduce work–family conflict on employee performance. Design: A group-randomized multisite controlled experimental study with longitudinal follow-up. Setting: An information technology firm. Participants: Employees randomized to the intervention (n = 348) and control condition (n = 345). Intervention: An intervention, “Start. Transform. Achieve. Results.” to enhance employees’ control over their work time, to increase supervisors’ support for this change, and to increase employees’ and supervisors’ focus on results. Methods: We estimated the effect of the intervention on 9 self-reported employee performance measures using a difference-in-differences approach with generalized linear mixed models. Performance measures included actual and expected hours worked, absenteeism, and presenteeism. Results: This study found little evidence that an intervention targeting work–family conflict affected employee performance. The only significant effect of the intervention was an approximately 1-hour reduction in expected work hours. After Bonferroni correction, the intervention effect is marginally insignificant at 6 months and marginally significant at 12 and 18 months. Conclusion: The intervention reduced expected working time by 1 hour per week; effects on most other employee self-reported performance measures were statistically insignificant. When coupled with the other positive wellness and firm outcomes, this intervention may be useful for improving employee perceptions of increased access to personal time or personal wellness without sacrificing performance. The null effects on performance provide countervailing evidence to recent negative press on work–family and flex work initiatives.

KW - field experiment

KW - performance

KW - productivity

KW - supervisor support

KW - well-being

KW - workplace flexibility

KW - workplace intervention

KW - work–family conflict

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041355957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041355957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0890117117696244

DO - 10.1177/0890117117696244

M3 - Article

C2 - 28299947

AN - SCOPUS:85041355957

JO - American Journal of Health Promotion

JF - American Journal of Health Promotion

SN - 0890-1171

ER -