Effect of Time Delay on the Diagnostic Use of Contrast Echocardiography in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain and no S-T Segment Elevation

Saul Kalvaitis, Sanjiv Kaul, Khim Leng Tong, Diana Rinkevich, Todd Belcik, Kevin Wei

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of time delay on the diagnostic and prognostic use of contrast echocardiography (CE) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP) and no S-T segment elevation. Methods: Patients (n = 957, 498 men) presenting to the ED within 12 hours of suggested cardiac CP underwent CE. Regional function (RF) and myocardial perfusion were interpreted separately by expert readers blinded to all other clinical data. Primary (acute myocardial infarction and total mortality) and secondary (unstable angina and revascularization) events within 24 hours of enrollment were determined. Results: Patients were divided into 4 quartiles based on the time interval between their last episode of CP and CE. Patients in quartile I had CE during CP (time delay of 0 minutes). The time delay in quartiles II, III, and IV were 54 ± 45, 213 ± 54, and 556 ± 184 minutes, respectively (P <.001). The incidence of events was similar among the 4 quartiles. In each quartile, patients with normal RF had the lowest incidence of events, whereas those with both abnormal RF and myocardial perfusion had the highest incidence of events. Patients with abnormal RF but normal myocardial perfusion had an intermediate event rate. Conclusions: In patients presenting to the ED within 12 hours of CP, the timing of CE does not influence its ability to predict events that occur 24 hours later. These findings have important implications in the performance of CE in the ED.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1488-1493
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
    Volume19
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 2006

    Fingerprint

    Chest Pain
    Echocardiography
    Hospital Emergency Service
    Perfusion
    Incidence
    Unstable Angina
    Myocardial Infarction
    Mortality

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
    • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

    Cite this

    @article{abcb6113ce234e818bbeaaf1d49224f9,
    title = "Effect of Time Delay on the Diagnostic Use of Contrast Echocardiography in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain and no S-T Segment Elevation",
    abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of time delay on the diagnostic and prognostic use of contrast echocardiography (CE) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP) and no S-T segment elevation. Methods: Patients (n = 957, 498 men) presenting to the ED within 12 hours of suggested cardiac CP underwent CE. Regional function (RF) and myocardial perfusion were interpreted separately by expert readers blinded to all other clinical data. Primary (acute myocardial infarction and total mortality) and secondary (unstable angina and revascularization) events within 24 hours of enrollment were determined. Results: Patients were divided into 4 quartiles based on the time interval between their last episode of CP and CE. Patients in quartile I had CE during CP (time delay of 0 minutes). The time delay in quartiles II, III, and IV were 54 ± 45, 213 ± 54, and 556 ± 184 minutes, respectively (P <.001). The incidence of events was similar among the 4 quartiles. In each quartile, patients with normal RF had the lowest incidence of events, whereas those with both abnormal RF and myocardial perfusion had the highest incidence of events. Patients with abnormal RF but normal myocardial perfusion had an intermediate event rate. Conclusions: In patients presenting to the ED within 12 hours of CP, the timing of CE does not influence its ability to predict events that occur 24 hours later. These findings have important implications in the performance of CE in the ED.",
    author = "Saul Kalvaitis and Sanjiv Kaul and Tong, {Khim Leng} and Diana Rinkevich and Todd Belcik and Kevin Wei",
    year = "2006",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1016/j.echo.2006.06.010",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "1488--1493",
    journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
    issn = "0894-7317",
    publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
    number = "12",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Effect of Time Delay on the Diagnostic Use of Contrast Echocardiography in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain and no S-T Segment Elevation

    AU - Kalvaitis, Saul

    AU - Kaul, Sanjiv

    AU - Tong, Khim Leng

    AU - Rinkevich, Diana

    AU - Belcik, Todd

    AU - Wei, Kevin

    PY - 2006/12

    Y1 - 2006/12

    N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of time delay on the diagnostic and prognostic use of contrast echocardiography (CE) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP) and no S-T segment elevation. Methods: Patients (n = 957, 498 men) presenting to the ED within 12 hours of suggested cardiac CP underwent CE. Regional function (RF) and myocardial perfusion were interpreted separately by expert readers blinded to all other clinical data. Primary (acute myocardial infarction and total mortality) and secondary (unstable angina and revascularization) events within 24 hours of enrollment were determined. Results: Patients were divided into 4 quartiles based on the time interval between their last episode of CP and CE. Patients in quartile I had CE during CP (time delay of 0 minutes). The time delay in quartiles II, III, and IV were 54 ± 45, 213 ± 54, and 556 ± 184 minutes, respectively (P <.001). The incidence of events was similar among the 4 quartiles. In each quartile, patients with normal RF had the lowest incidence of events, whereas those with both abnormal RF and myocardial perfusion had the highest incidence of events. Patients with abnormal RF but normal myocardial perfusion had an intermediate event rate. Conclusions: In patients presenting to the ED within 12 hours of CP, the timing of CE does not influence its ability to predict events that occur 24 hours later. These findings have important implications in the performance of CE in the ED.

    AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of time delay on the diagnostic and prognostic use of contrast echocardiography (CE) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP) and no S-T segment elevation. Methods: Patients (n = 957, 498 men) presenting to the ED within 12 hours of suggested cardiac CP underwent CE. Regional function (RF) and myocardial perfusion were interpreted separately by expert readers blinded to all other clinical data. Primary (acute myocardial infarction and total mortality) and secondary (unstable angina and revascularization) events within 24 hours of enrollment were determined. Results: Patients were divided into 4 quartiles based on the time interval between their last episode of CP and CE. Patients in quartile I had CE during CP (time delay of 0 minutes). The time delay in quartiles II, III, and IV were 54 ± 45, 213 ± 54, and 556 ± 184 minutes, respectively (P <.001). The incidence of events was similar among the 4 quartiles. In each quartile, patients with normal RF had the lowest incidence of events, whereas those with both abnormal RF and myocardial perfusion had the highest incidence of events. Patients with abnormal RF but normal myocardial perfusion had an intermediate event rate. Conclusions: In patients presenting to the ED within 12 hours of CP, the timing of CE does not influence its ability to predict events that occur 24 hours later. These findings have important implications in the performance of CE in the ED.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751330018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751330018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2006.06.010

    DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2006.06.010

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 17138034

    AN - SCOPUS:33751330018

    VL - 19

    SP - 1488

    EP - 1493

    JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

    JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

    SN - 0894-7317

    IS - 12

    ER -