Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography

Stephen H. Taplin, L. Abraham, B. M. Geller, B. C. Yankaskas, D. S M Buist, R. Smith-Bindman, C. Lehman, D. Weaver, Patricia (Patty) Carney, W. E. Barlow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Most breast biopsies will be negative for cancer. Benign breast biopsy can cause changes in the breast tissue, but whether such changes affect the interpretive performance of future screening mammography is not known.Methods We prospectively evaluated whether self-reported benign breast biopsy was associated with reduced subsequent screening mammography performance using examination data from the mammography registries of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium from January 2, 1996, through December 31, 2005. A positive interpretation was defined as a recommendation for any additional evaluation. Cancer was defined as any invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed within 1 year of mammography screening. Measures of mammography performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value 1 [PPV1]) were compared both at woman level and breast level in the presence and absence of self-reported benign biopsy history. Referral to biopsy was considered a positive interpretation to calculate positive predictive value 2 (PPV2). Multivariable analysis of a correct interpretation on each performance measure was conducted after adjusting for registry, year of examination, patient characteristics, months since last mammogram, and availability of comparison film. Accuracy of the mammogram interpretation was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results A total of 2007381 screening mammograms were identified among 799613 women, of which 14.6% mammograms were associated with self-reported previous breast biopsy. Multivariable adjusted models for mammography performance showed reduced specificity (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73 to 0.75, P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1040-1051
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume102
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Mammography
Breast
Biopsy
Registries
Breast Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Neoplasms
Referral and Consultation
History
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Taplin, S. H., Abraham, L., Geller, B. M., Yankaskas, B. C., Buist, D. S. M., Smith-Bindman, R., ... Barlow, W. E. (2010). Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 102(14), 1040-1051. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq233

Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography. / Taplin, Stephen H.; Abraham, L.; Geller, B. M.; Yankaskas, B. C.; Buist, D. S M; Smith-Bindman, R.; Lehman, C.; Weaver, D.; Carney, Patricia (Patty); Barlow, W. E.

In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 102, No. 14, 07.2010, p. 1040-1051.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taplin, SH, Abraham, L, Geller, BM, Yankaskas, BC, Buist, DSM, Smith-Bindman, R, Lehman, C, Weaver, D, Carney, PP & Barlow, WE 2010, 'Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography', Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 102, no. 14, pp. 1040-1051. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq233
Taplin, Stephen H. ; Abraham, L. ; Geller, B. M. ; Yankaskas, B. C. ; Buist, D. S M ; Smith-Bindman, R. ; Lehman, C. ; Weaver, D. ; Carney, Patricia (Patty) ; Barlow, W. E. / Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography. In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2010 ; Vol. 102, No. 14. pp. 1040-1051.
@article{dc47a25fd6924e50828eb9e0c884c685,
title = "Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography",
abstract = "Background Most breast biopsies will be negative for cancer. Benign breast biopsy can cause changes in the breast tissue, but whether such changes affect the interpretive performance of future screening mammography is not known.Methods We prospectively evaluated whether self-reported benign breast biopsy was associated with reduced subsequent screening mammography performance using examination data from the mammography registries of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium from January 2, 1996, through December 31, 2005. A positive interpretation was defined as a recommendation for any additional evaluation. Cancer was defined as any invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed within 1 year of mammography screening. Measures of mammography performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value 1 [PPV1]) were compared both at woman level and breast level in the presence and absence of self-reported benign biopsy history. Referral to biopsy was considered a positive interpretation to calculate positive predictive value 2 (PPV2). Multivariable analysis of a correct interpretation on each performance measure was conducted after adjusting for registry, year of examination, patient characteristics, months since last mammogram, and availability of comparison film. Accuracy of the mammogram interpretation was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results A total of 2007381 screening mammograms were identified among 799613 women, of which 14.6{\%} mammograms were associated with self-reported previous breast biopsy. Multivariable adjusted models for mammography performance showed reduced specificity (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 0.73 to 0.75, P",
author = "Taplin, {Stephen H.} and L. Abraham and Geller, {B. M.} and Yankaskas, {B. C.} and Buist, {D. S M} and R. Smith-Bindman and C. Lehman and D. Weaver and Carney, {Patricia (Patty)} and Barlow, {W. E.}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1093/jnci/djq233",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1040--1051",
journal = "Journal of the National Cancer Institute",
issn = "0027-8874",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography

AU - Taplin, Stephen H.

AU - Abraham, L.

AU - Geller, B. M.

AU - Yankaskas, B. C.

AU - Buist, D. S M

AU - Smith-Bindman, R.

AU - Lehman, C.

AU - Weaver, D.

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

AU - Barlow, W. E.

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Background Most breast biopsies will be negative for cancer. Benign breast biopsy can cause changes in the breast tissue, but whether such changes affect the interpretive performance of future screening mammography is not known.Methods We prospectively evaluated whether self-reported benign breast biopsy was associated with reduced subsequent screening mammography performance using examination data from the mammography registries of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium from January 2, 1996, through December 31, 2005. A positive interpretation was defined as a recommendation for any additional evaluation. Cancer was defined as any invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed within 1 year of mammography screening. Measures of mammography performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value 1 [PPV1]) were compared both at woman level and breast level in the presence and absence of self-reported benign biopsy history. Referral to biopsy was considered a positive interpretation to calculate positive predictive value 2 (PPV2). Multivariable analysis of a correct interpretation on each performance measure was conducted after adjusting for registry, year of examination, patient characteristics, months since last mammogram, and availability of comparison film. Accuracy of the mammogram interpretation was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results A total of 2007381 screening mammograms were identified among 799613 women, of which 14.6% mammograms were associated with self-reported previous breast biopsy. Multivariable adjusted models for mammography performance showed reduced specificity (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73 to 0.75, P

AB - Background Most breast biopsies will be negative for cancer. Benign breast biopsy can cause changes in the breast tissue, but whether such changes affect the interpretive performance of future screening mammography is not known.Methods We prospectively evaluated whether self-reported benign breast biopsy was associated with reduced subsequent screening mammography performance using examination data from the mammography registries of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium from January 2, 1996, through December 31, 2005. A positive interpretation was defined as a recommendation for any additional evaluation. Cancer was defined as any invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed within 1 year of mammography screening. Measures of mammography performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value 1 [PPV1]) were compared both at woman level and breast level in the presence and absence of self-reported benign biopsy history. Referral to biopsy was considered a positive interpretation to calculate positive predictive value 2 (PPV2). Multivariable analysis of a correct interpretation on each performance measure was conducted after adjusting for registry, year of examination, patient characteristics, months since last mammogram, and availability of comparison film. Accuracy of the mammogram interpretation was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results A total of 2007381 screening mammograms were identified among 799613 women, of which 14.6% mammograms were associated with self-reported previous breast biopsy. Multivariable adjusted models for mammography performance showed reduced specificity (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73 to 0.75, P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954999776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954999776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djq233

DO - 10.1093/jnci/djq233

M3 - Article

C2 - 20601590

AN - SCOPUS:77954999776

VL - 102

SP - 1040

EP - 1051

JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute

JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute

SN - 0027-8874

IS - 14

ER -