Effect of intensive care unit organizational model and structure on outcomes in patients with acute lung injury

Miriam Treggiari, Diane P. Martin, Norbert Yanez, Ellen Caldwell, Leonard D. Hudson, Gordon D. Rubenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Prior studies supported an association between intensive care unit (ICU) organizational model or staffing patterns and outcome in critically ill patients. Objectives: To examine the association of closed versus open models with patient mortality across adult ICUs in King County (WA). Methods: Cohort study of patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Measurements and Main Results: ICU structure, organization, and patient care practices were assessed using self-administered mail questionnaires completed by the medical director and nurse manager. We defined closed ICUs as units that required patient transfer to or mandatory patient comanagement by an intensivist and open ICUs as those relying on other organizational models. Outcomes were obtained from the King County Lung Injury Project, a population-based cohort of patients with ALI. The main endpoint was hospital mortality. Of 24 eligible ICUs, 13 ICUs were designated closed and 11 open. Complete survey data were available for 23 (96%) ICUs. Higher physician and nurse availability was reported in closed versus open ICUs. A total of 684 of 1,075 (63%) of patients with ALI were cared for in closed ICUs. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with ALI cared for in closed ICUs had reduced hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.53, 0.89; P = 0.004). Consultation by a pulmonologist in open ICUs was not associated with improved mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.74, 1.20; P = 0.62). These findings were robust for varying assumptions about the study population definition. Conclusions: Patients with ALI cared for in a closed-model ICU have reduced mortality. These data support recommendations to implement structured intensive care in the United States.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-690
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume176
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Organizational Models
Acute Lung Injury
Intensive Care Units
Hospital Mortality
Mortality
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Physician Executives
Patient Transfer
Nurse Administrators
Postal Service
Lung Injury
Critical Care
Critical Illness
Population
Patient Care
Cohort Studies
Referral and Consultation
Nurses
Organizations

Keywords

  • Intensive care unit
  • Intensivist
  • Leapfrog Group
  • Outcome
  • Practice patterns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Effect of intensive care unit organizational model and structure on outcomes in patients with acute lung injury. / Treggiari, Miriam; Martin, Diane P.; Yanez, Norbert; Caldwell, Ellen; Hudson, Leonard D.; Rubenfeld, Gordon D.

In: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 176, No. 7, 01.10.2007, p. 685-690.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{86e98f221b864af6a7421037b8f35cb0,
title = "Effect of intensive care unit organizational model and structure on outcomes in patients with acute lung injury",
abstract = "Rationale: Prior studies supported an association between intensive care unit (ICU) organizational model or staffing patterns and outcome in critically ill patients. Objectives: To examine the association of closed versus open models with patient mortality across adult ICUs in King County (WA). Methods: Cohort study of patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Measurements and Main Results: ICU structure, organization, and patient care practices were assessed using self-administered mail questionnaires completed by the medical director and nurse manager. We defined closed ICUs as units that required patient transfer to or mandatory patient comanagement by an intensivist and open ICUs as those relying on other organizational models. Outcomes were obtained from the King County Lung Injury Project, a population-based cohort of patients with ALI. The main endpoint was hospital mortality. Of 24 eligible ICUs, 13 ICUs were designated closed and 11 open. Complete survey data were available for 23 (96{\%}) ICUs. Higher physician and nurse availability was reported in closed versus open ICUs. A total of 684 of 1,075 (63{\%}) of patients with ALI were cared for in closed ICUs. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with ALI cared for in closed ICUs had reduced hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.53, 0.89; P = 0.004). Consultation by a pulmonologist in open ICUs was not associated with improved mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.74, 1.20; P = 0.62). These findings were robust for varying assumptions about the study population definition. Conclusions: Patients with ALI cared for in a closed-model ICU have reduced mortality. These data support recommendations to implement structured intensive care in the United States.",
keywords = "Intensive care unit, Intensivist, Leapfrog Group, Outcome, Practice patterns",
author = "Miriam Treggiari and Martin, {Diane P.} and Norbert Yanez and Ellen Caldwell and Hudson, {Leonard D.} and Rubenfeld, {Gordon D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1164/rccm.200701-165OC",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "176",
pages = "685--690",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of intensive care unit organizational model and structure on outcomes in patients with acute lung injury

AU - Treggiari, Miriam

AU - Martin, Diane P.

AU - Yanez, Norbert

AU - Caldwell, Ellen

AU - Hudson, Leonard D.

AU - Rubenfeld, Gordon D.

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - Rationale: Prior studies supported an association between intensive care unit (ICU) organizational model or staffing patterns and outcome in critically ill patients. Objectives: To examine the association of closed versus open models with patient mortality across adult ICUs in King County (WA). Methods: Cohort study of patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Measurements and Main Results: ICU structure, organization, and patient care practices were assessed using self-administered mail questionnaires completed by the medical director and nurse manager. We defined closed ICUs as units that required patient transfer to or mandatory patient comanagement by an intensivist and open ICUs as those relying on other organizational models. Outcomes were obtained from the King County Lung Injury Project, a population-based cohort of patients with ALI. The main endpoint was hospital mortality. Of 24 eligible ICUs, 13 ICUs were designated closed and 11 open. Complete survey data were available for 23 (96%) ICUs. Higher physician and nurse availability was reported in closed versus open ICUs. A total of 684 of 1,075 (63%) of patients with ALI were cared for in closed ICUs. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with ALI cared for in closed ICUs had reduced hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.53, 0.89; P = 0.004). Consultation by a pulmonologist in open ICUs was not associated with improved mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.74, 1.20; P = 0.62). These findings were robust for varying assumptions about the study population definition. Conclusions: Patients with ALI cared for in a closed-model ICU have reduced mortality. These data support recommendations to implement structured intensive care in the United States.

AB - Rationale: Prior studies supported an association between intensive care unit (ICU) organizational model or staffing patterns and outcome in critically ill patients. Objectives: To examine the association of closed versus open models with patient mortality across adult ICUs in King County (WA). Methods: Cohort study of patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Measurements and Main Results: ICU structure, organization, and patient care practices were assessed using self-administered mail questionnaires completed by the medical director and nurse manager. We defined closed ICUs as units that required patient transfer to or mandatory patient comanagement by an intensivist and open ICUs as those relying on other organizational models. Outcomes were obtained from the King County Lung Injury Project, a population-based cohort of patients with ALI. The main endpoint was hospital mortality. Of 24 eligible ICUs, 13 ICUs were designated closed and 11 open. Complete survey data were available for 23 (96%) ICUs. Higher physician and nurse availability was reported in closed versus open ICUs. A total of 684 of 1,075 (63%) of patients with ALI were cared for in closed ICUs. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with ALI cared for in closed ICUs had reduced hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.53, 0.89; P = 0.004). Consultation by a pulmonologist in open ICUs was not associated with improved mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.74, 1.20; P = 0.62). These findings were robust for varying assumptions about the study population definition. Conclusions: Patients with ALI cared for in a closed-model ICU have reduced mortality. These data support recommendations to implement structured intensive care in the United States.

KW - Intensive care unit

KW - Intensivist

KW - Leapfrog Group

KW - Outcome

KW - Practice patterns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848813188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848813188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1164/rccm.200701-165OC

DO - 10.1164/rccm.200701-165OC

M3 - Article

VL - 176

SP - 685

EP - 690

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 7

ER -