Effect of insufficient light exposure on polymerization kinetics of conventional and self-adhesive dual-cure resin cements

Y. Jang, Jack Ferracane, Carmem Pfeifer, J. W. Park, Y. Shin, B. D. Roh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of insufficient light exposure on the polymerization of conventional and self-adhesive dual-cure resin cements under ceramic restorations. Methods: Two conventional dual-cure resin cements (Rely-X ARC, Duolink) and two selfadhesive resin cements (Rely-X U200, Maxcem Elite) were polymerized under different curing modes (dual-cure or self-cure), curing times (20 and 120 seconds), and thickness of a ceramic overlay (2 and 4 mm). Polymerization kinetics was measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for the initial 10 minutes and after 24 hours. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way ANOVA/Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test, and paired t-test (α=0.05). Results: When light-curing time was set to 20 seconds, the presence of the ceramic block significantly affected the degree of conversion (DC) of all resin cements. Especially, the DC of the groups with 20 seconds of light-curing time under 4 mm of ceramic thickness was even lower than that of the self-cured groups at 24 hours after polymerization (p<0.05). However, when light-curing time was set to 120 seconds, a similar DC compared with the group with direct light exposure (p>0.05) was achieved in all dual-cure groups except Maxcem Elite, at 24 hours after polymerization. Conclusions: For both conventional and selfadhesive dual-cure resin cements, insufficient light exposure (20 seconds of light-curing time) through thick ceramic restoration (4 mm thick) resulted in a DC even lower than that of self-curing alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E1-E9
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Ceramics
Polymerization
Adhesives
Light
Resin Cements
Analysis of Variance
AIDS-Related Complex
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
DCR cement
Students
Maxcem
Rely-X

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Effect of insufficient light exposure on polymerization kinetics of conventional and self-adhesive dual-cure resin cements. / Jang, Y.; Ferracane, Jack; Pfeifer, Carmem; Park, J. W.; Shin, Y.; Roh, B. D.

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. E1-E9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba3f8b0302fc45408f023dd0a7c61d9d,
title = "Effect of insufficient light exposure on polymerization kinetics of conventional and self-adhesive dual-cure resin cements",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of insufficient light exposure on the polymerization of conventional and self-adhesive dual-cure resin cements under ceramic restorations. Methods: Two conventional dual-cure resin cements (Rely-X ARC, Duolink) and two selfadhesive resin cements (Rely-X U200, Maxcem Elite) were polymerized under different curing modes (dual-cure or self-cure), curing times (20 and 120 seconds), and thickness of a ceramic overlay (2 and 4 mm). Polymerization kinetics was measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for the initial 10 minutes and after 24 hours. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way ANOVA/Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test, and paired t-test (α=0.05). Results: When light-curing time was set to 20 seconds, the presence of the ceramic block significantly affected the degree of conversion (DC) of all resin cements. Especially, the DC of the groups with 20 seconds of light-curing time under 4 mm of ceramic thickness was even lower than that of the self-cured groups at 24 hours after polymerization (p<0.05). However, when light-curing time was set to 120 seconds, a similar DC compared with the group with direct light exposure (p>0.05) was achieved in all dual-cure groups except Maxcem Elite, at 24 hours after polymerization. Conclusions: For both conventional and selfadhesive dual-cure resin cements, insufficient light exposure (20 seconds of light-curing time) through thick ceramic restoration (4 mm thick) resulted in a DC even lower than that of self-curing alone.",
author = "Y. Jang and Jack Ferracane and Carmem Pfeifer and Park, {J. W.} and Y. Shin and Roh, {B. D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2341/15-278-L",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "E1--E9",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of insufficient light exposure on polymerization kinetics of conventional and self-adhesive dual-cure resin cements

AU - Jang, Y.

AU - Ferracane, Jack

AU - Pfeifer, Carmem

AU - Park, J. W.

AU - Shin, Y.

AU - Roh, B. D.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of insufficient light exposure on the polymerization of conventional and self-adhesive dual-cure resin cements under ceramic restorations. Methods: Two conventional dual-cure resin cements (Rely-X ARC, Duolink) and two selfadhesive resin cements (Rely-X U200, Maxcem Elite) were polymerized under different curing modes (dual-cure or self-cure), curing times (20 and 120 seconds), and thickness of a ceramic overlay (2 and 4 mm). Polymerization kinetics was measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for the initial 10 minutes and after 24 hours. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way ANOVA/Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test, and paired t-test (α=0.05). Results: When light-curing time was set to 20 seconds, the presence of the ceramic block significantly affected the degree of conversion (DC) of all resin cements. Especially, the DC of the groups with 20 seconds of light-curing time under 4 mm of ceramic thickness was even lower than that of the self-cured groups at 24 hours after polymerization (p<0.05). However, when light-curing time was set to 120 seconds, a similar DC compared with the group with direct light exposure (p>0.05) was achieved in all dual-cure groups except Maxcem Elite, at 24 hours after polymerization. Conclusions: For both conventional and selfadhesive dual-cure resin cements, insufficient light exposure (20 seconds of light-curing time) through thick ceramic restoration (4 mm thick) resulted in a DC even lower than that of self-curing alone.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of insufficient light exposure on the polymerization of conventional and self-adhesive dual-cure resin cements under ceramic restorations. Methods: Two conventional dual-cure resin cements (Rely-X ARC, Duolink) and two selfadhesive resin cements (Rely-X U200, Maxcem Elite) were polymerized under different curing modes (dual-cure or self-cure), curing times (20 and 120 seconds), and thickness of a ceramic overlay (2 and 4 mm). Polymerization kinetics was measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for the initial 10 minutes and after 24 hours. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way ANOVA/Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test, and paired t-test (α=0.05). Results: When light-curing time was set to 20 seconds, the presence of the ceramic block significantly affected the degree of conversion (DC) of all resin cements. Especially, the DC of the groups with 20 seconds of light-curing time under 4 mm of ceramic thickness was even lower than that of the self-cured groups at 24 hours after polymerization (p<0.05). However, when light-curing time was set to 120 seconds, a similar DC compared with the group with direct light exposure (p>0.05) was achieved in all dual-cure groups except Maxcem Elite, at 24 hours after polymerization. Conclusions: For both conventional and selfadhesive dual-cure resin cements, insufficient light exposure (20 seconds of light-curing time) through thick ceramic restoration (4 mm thick) resulted in a DC even lower than that of self-curing alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008392779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008392779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2341/15-278-L

DO - 10.2341/15-278-L

M3 - Article

C2 - 27689771

AN - SCOPUS:85008392779

VL - 42

SP - E1-E9

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 1

ER -