Effect of clinical vignettes on senior medical students' opinions of climate change

Vinay Prasad, William Thistlethwaite, William Dale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The consequences of climate change directly threaten human health. Some have argued that, as such, doctors have a special duty to solve climate change. Despite such recommendations, to our knowledge, there has been no previous work documenting physician attitudes on climate change, or the stability of those opinions. METHODS: We invited 523 fourth-year medical students to a survey asking their opinion on climate change and their opinion regarding one of two fictional medical vignettes. In the vignettes, which are analogous to the climate change issue, students decide whether to discontinue a drug that may be adversely affecting laboratory values. In the climate change question, students are asked whether the United States should take efforts to discontinue the use of fossil fuels. Students are randomized to the order in which they receive the questions. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (95% CI 89.1%-100%) of students initially asked about climate change feel the United States should take steps to curb carbon dioxide emissions, while only 73% (95% CI 57.5%-89.2%) of students respond similarly if first given an analogous patient vignette. Conversely, in all cases where a fictional medical vignette follows the climate change question, students are more likely to cease using a potentially harmful agent (66% CI 53.5%-71.8% vs. 52% CI 43.3%-67.1%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that student physician attitudes to climate change are mutable. Priming students into "medical mode" may alter their opinions on the scientific merit of nonmedical issues, and may be a vestige of a hidden medical curriculum. Further studies should explore the interrelationship between other sociopolitical beliefs and medical decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-404
Number of pages4
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume104
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Climate Change
Medical Students
Students
Fossil Fuels
Physicians
Carbon Dioxide
Curriculum
Health

Keywords

  • climate change
  • paired decision making
  • physicians' opinions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of clinical vignettes on senior medical students' opinions of climate change. / Prasad, Vinay; Thistlethwaite, William; Dale, William.

In: Southern Medical Journal, Vol. 104, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 401-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prasad, Vinay ; Thistlethwaite, William ; Dale, William. / Effect of clinical vignettes on senior medical students' opinions of climate change. In: Southern Medical Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 104, No. 6. pp. 401-404.
@article{1d8c5deee6a74f9a84cc0e1adcec88a4,
title = "Effect of clinical vignettes on senior medical students' opinions of climate change",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The consequences of climate change directly threaten human health. Some have argued that, as such, doctors have a special duty to solve climate change. Despite such recommendations, to our knowledge, there has been no previous work documenting physician attitudes on climate change, or the stability of those opinions. METHODS: We invited 523 fourth-year medical students to a survey asking their opinion on climate change and their opinion regarding one of two fictional medical vignettes. In the vignettes, which are analogous to the climate change issue, students decide whether to discontinue a drug that may be adversely affecting laboratory values. In the climate change question, students are asked whether the United States should take efforts to discontinue the use of fossil fuels. Students are randomized to the order in which they receive the questions. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (95{\%} CI 89.1{\%}-100{\%}) of students initially asked about climate change feel the United States should take steps to curb carbon dioxide emissions, while only 73{\%} (95{\%} CI 57.5{\%}-89.2{\%}) of students respond similarly if first given an analogous patient vignette. Conversely, in all cases where a fictional medical vignette follows the climate change question, students are more likely to cease using a potentially harmful agent (66{\%} CI 53.5{\%}-71.8{\%} vs. 52{\%} CI 43.3{\%}-67.1{\%}). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that student physician attitudes to climate change are mutable. Priming students into {"}medical mode{"} may alter their opinions on the scientific merit of nonmedical issues, and may be a vestige of a hidden medical curriculum. Further studies should explore the interrelationship between other sociopolitical beliefs and medical decision making.",
keywords = "climate change, paired decision making, physicians' opinions",
author = "Vinay Prasad and William Thistlethwaite and William Dale",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31821a841d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "401--404",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of clinical vignettes on senior medical students' opinions of climate change

AU - Prasad, Vinay

AU - Thistlethwaite, William

AU - Dale, William

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The consequences of climate change directly threaten human health. Some have argued that, as such, doctors have a special duty to solve climate change. Despite such recommendations, to our knowledge, there has been no previous work documenting physician attitudes on climate change, or the stability of those opinions. METHODS: We invited 523 fourth-year medical students to a survey asking their opinion on climate change and their opinion regarding one of two fictional medical vignettes. In the vignettes, which are analogous to the climate change issue, students decide whether to discontinue a drug that may be adversely affecting laboratory values. In the climate change question, students are asked whether the United States should take efforts to discontinue the use of fossil fuels. Students are randomized to the order in which they receive the questions. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (95% CI 89.1%-100%) of students initially asked about climate change feel the United States should take steps to curb carbon dioxide emissions, while only 73% (95% CI 57.5%-89.2%) of students respond similarly if first given an analogous patient vignette. Conversely, in all cases where a fictional medical vignette follows the climate change question, students are more likely to cease using a potentially harmful agent (66% CI 53.5%-71.8% vs. 52% CI 43.3%-67.1%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that student physician attitudes to climate change are mutable. Priming students into "medical mode" may alter their opinions on the scientific merit of nonmedical issues, and may be a vestige of a hidden medical curriculum. Further studies should explore the interrelationship between other sociopolitical beliefs and medical decision making.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The consequences of climate change directly threaten human health. Some have argued that, as such, doctors have a special duty to solve climate change. Despite such recommendations, to our knowledge, there has been no previous work documenting physician attitudes on climate change, or the stability of those opinions. METHODS: We invited 523 fourth-year medical students to a survey asking their opinion on climate change and their opinion regarding one of two fictional medical vignettes. In the vignettes, which are analogous to the climate change issue, students decide whether to discontinue a drug that may be adversely affecting laboratory values. In the climate change question, students are asked whether the United States should take efforts to discontinue the use of fossil fuels. Students are randomized to the order in which they receive the questions. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (95% CI 89.1%-100%) of students initially asked about climate change feel the United States should take steps to curb carbon dioxide emissions, while only 73% (95% CI 57.5%-89.2%) of students respond similarly if first given an analogous patient vignette. Conversely, in all cases where a fictional medical vignette follows the climate change question, students are more likely to cease using a potentially harmful agent (66% CI 53.5%-71.8% vs. 52% CI 43.3%-67.1%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that student physician attitudes to climate change are mutable. Priming students into "medical mode" may alter their opinions on the scientific merit of nonmedical issues, and may be a vestige of a hidden medical curriculum. Further studies should explore the interrelationship between other sociopolitical beliefs and medical decision making.

KW - climate change

KW - paired decision making

KW - physicians' opinions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957526775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957526775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31821a841d

DO - 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31821a841d

M3 - Article

C2 - 21886028

AN - SCOPUS:79957526775

VL - 104

SP - 401

EP - 404

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 6

ER -