Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine

W. Thomas Edwards, Jung Yoo, Dewei Zou, James Bayley, Hansen A. Yuan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A nerve root impingement within a stenotic neuroforamen is a common sequela of cervical degenerative arthritis and herniated nucleus pulposus. Understanding of the effects of cervical position on foraminal size is important in the assessment of pathology and injury, for selection of a provocative maneuver to elicit symptoms and in selecting a position of immobilization for the management of nerve root impingement syndrome. This biomechanical study of human cadaver cervical spines reports the measured variations in the sizes of neuroforamina as a function of cervical positioning. Five fresh frozen adult human cadaver cervical spines (C2-T1) were tested with combinations of flexion-extension and rotational position. Ten pounds of axial load was applied to simulate a normal loading of a cervical spine. The foramina of C5, C6, and C7 were directly measured using a set of finely graded circular probes. Compared to the foraminal diameter at the neutral position, there were statistically significant reductions in the foramen diameter of 10% and 13%, at 20° and 30° of extension respectively (P<0.01). Conversely, in flexion, there were statistically significant increase of 8% and 10% at 20° and 30° of flexion respectively (P <0.01). Though there was a reduction in the foraminal size with ipsilateral 20° rotation, and an increase with contralateral 20° rotation, these changes were not significantly different from the mean of the control. Combinations of flexion or extension position with axial rotation did not significantly change the foraminal size compared to the respective sagittal position with no axial rotation. From 30° extension to 30° flexion, the mean change of foraminal diameter was 1.4mm. This anatomical study shows that extension and ipsilateral rotation reduces the forminal area which contributes to pain, nerve root compression, and neural injury. Flexion, extension, and rotational maneuvers may therefore afford a provocative test for establishing the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. Furthermore, the study suggests that patients managed conservatively should be immobilized in their orthoses in a flexed rather than an extended position, to decrease nerve root impingement by maximizing the diameter of the neural foramina.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1131-1136
Number of pages6
JournalSpine
Volume17
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spine
Cadaver
Spinal Stenosis
Orthotic Devices
Radiculopathy
Wounds and Injuries
Immobilization
Osteoarthritis
Pathology
Pain

Keywords

  • Biomechanics of cervical spine
  • Cervical foramina
  • Cervical motion
  • Nerve root compression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Edwards, W. T., Yoo, J., Zou, D., Bayley, J., & Yuan, H. A. (1992). Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine. Spine, 17(10), 1131-1136.

Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine. / Edwards, W. Thomas; Yoo, Jung; Zou, Dewei; Bayley, James; Yuan, Hansen A.

In: Spine, Vol. 17, No. 10, 1992, p. 1131-1136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Edwards, WT, Yoo, J, Zou, D, Bayley, J & Yuan, HA 1992, 'Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine', Spine, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1131-1136.
Edwards, W. Thomas ; Yoo, Jung ; Zou, Dewei ; Bayley, James ; Yuan, Hansen A. / Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine. In: Spine. 1992 ; Vol. 17, No. 10. pp. 1131-1136.
@article{3261b63269ad400da54c5754c1f82507,
title = "Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine",
abstract = "A nerve root impingement within a stenotic neuroforamen is a common sequela of cervical degenerative arthritis and herniated nucleus pulposus. Understanding of the effects of cervical position on foraminal size is important in the assessment of pathology and injury, for selection of a provocative maneuver to elicit symptoms and in selecting a position of immobilization for the management of nerve root impingement syndrome. This biomechanical study of human cadaver cervical spines reports the measured variations in the sizes of neuroforamina as a function of cervical positioning. Five fresh frozen adult human cadaver cervical spines (C2-T1) were tested with combinations of flexion-extension and rotational position. Ten pounds of axial load was applied to simulate a normal loading of a cervical spine. The foramina of C5, C6, and C7 were directly measured using a set of finely graded circular probes. Compared to the foraminal diameter at the neutral position, there were statistically significant reductions in the foramen diameter of 10{\%} and 13{\%}, at 20° and 30° of extension respectively (P<0.01). Conversely, in flexion, there were statistically significant increase of 8{\%} and 10{\%} at 20° and 30° of flexion respectively (P <0.01). Though there was a reduction in the foraminal size with ipsilateral 20° rotation, and an increase with contralateral 20° rotation, these changes were not significantly different from the mean of the control. Combinations of flexion or extension position with axial rotation did not significantly change the foraminal size compared to the respective sagittal position with no axial rotation. From 30° extension to 30° flexion, the mean change of foraminal diameter was 1.4mm. This anatomical study shows that extension and ipsilateral rotation reduces the forminal area which contributes to pain, nerve root compression, and neural injury. Flexion, extension, and rotational maneuvers may therefore afford a provocative test for establishing the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. Furthermore, the study suggests that patients managed conservatively should be immobilized in their orthoses in a flexed rather than an extended position, to decrease nerve root impingement by maximizing the diameter of the neural foramina.",
keywords = "Biomechanics of cervical spine, Cervical foramina, Cervical motion, Nerve root compression",
author = "Edwards, {W. Thomas} and Jung Yoo and Dewei Zou and James Bayley and Yuan, {Hansen A.}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "1131--1136",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine

AU - Edwards, W. Thomas

AU - Yoo, Jung

AU - Zou, Dewei

AU - Bayley, James

AU - Yuan, Hansen A.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - A nerve root impingement within a stenotic neuroforamen is a common sequela of cervical degenerative arthritis and herniated nucleus pulposus. Understanding of the effects of cervical position on foraminal size is important in the assessment of pathology and injury, for selection of a provocative maneuver to elicit symptoms and in selecting a position of immobilization for the management of nerve root impingement syndrome. This biomechanical study of human cadaver cervical spines reports the measured variations in the sizes of neuroforamina as a function of cervical positioning. Five fresh frozen adult human cadaver cervical spines (C2-T1) were tested with combinations of flexion-extension and rotational position. Ten pounds of axial load was applied to simulate a normal loading of a cervical spine. The foramina of C5, C6, and C7 were directly measured using a set of finely graded circular probes. Compared to the foraminal diameter at the neutral position, there were statistically significant reductions in the foramen diameter of 10% and 13%, at 20° and 30° of extension respectively (P<0.01). Conversely, in flexion, there were statistically significant increase of 8% and 10% at 20° and 30° of flexion respectively (P <0.01). Though there was a reduction in the foraminal size with ipsilateral 20° rotation, and an increase with contralateral 20° rotation, these changes were not significantly different from the mean of the control. Combinations of flexion or extension position with axial rotation did not significantly change the foraminal size compared to the respective sagittal position with no axial rotation. From 30° extension to 30° flexion, the mean change of foraminal diameter was 1.4mm. This anatomical study shows that extension and ipsilateral rotation reduces the forminal area which contributes to pain, nerve root compression, and neural injury. Flexion, extension, and rotational maneuvers may therefore afford a provocative test for establishing the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. Furthermore, the study suggests that patients managed conservatively should be immobilized in their orthoses in a flexed rather than an extended position, to decrease nerve root impingement by maximizing the diameter of the neural foramina.

AB - A nerve root impingement within a stenotic neuroforamen is a common sequela of cervical degenerative arthritis and herniated nucleus pulposus. Understanding of the effects of cervical position on foraminal size is important in the assessment of pathology and injury, for selection of a provocative maneuver to elicit symptoms and in selecting a position of immobilization for the management of nerve root impingement syndrome. This biomechanical study of human cadaver cervical spines reports the measured variations in the sizes of neuroforamina as a function of cervical positioning. Five fresh frozen adult human cadaver cervical spines (C2-T1) were tested with combinations of flexion-extension and rotational position. Ten pounds of axial load was applied to simulate a normal loading of a cervical spine. The foramina of C5, C6, and C7 were directly measured using a set of finely graded circular probes. Compared to the foraminal diameter at the neutral position, there were statistically significant reductions in the foramen diameter of 10% and 13%, at 20° and 30° of extension respectively (P<0.01). Conversely, in flexion, there were statistically significant increase of 8% and 10% at 20° and 30° of flexion respectively (P <0.01). Though there was a reduction in the foraminal size with ipsilateral 20° rotation, and an increase with contralateral 20° rotation, these changes were not significantly different from the mean of the control. Combinations of flexion or extension position with axial rotation did not significantly change the foraminal size compared to the respective sagittal position with no axial rotation. From 30° extension to 30° flexion, the mean change of foraminal diameter was 1.4mm. This anatomical study shows that extension and ipsilateral rotation reduces the forminal area which contributes to pain, nerve root compression, and neural injury. Flexion, extension, and rotational maneuvers may therefore afford a provocative test for establishing the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. Furthermore, the study suggests that patients managed conservatively should be immobilized in their orthoses in a flexed rather than an extended position, to decrease nerve root impingement by maximizing the diameter of the neural foramina.

KW - Biomechanics of cervical spine

KW - Cervical foramina

KW - Cervical motion

KW - Nerve root compression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026714798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026714798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1440000

AN - SCOPUS:0026714798

VL - 17

SP - 1131

EP - 1136

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 10

ER -