Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome

Amira Y. El-Bastawissi, Thomas Becker, Janet R. Daling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) and its management on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Methods: We used a population-based retrospective cohort design that included record linkage between cancer data and birth records. The Cancer Surveillance System records of women with CIS (n = 1851, 312 diagnosed during pregnancy) diagnosed between 1984 and 1992, were linked to birth certificates of their first subsequent deliveries after CIS diagnosis. The comparison group (n = 9201) was a random sample of women without CIS who gave birth during the same years. The outcome measures were preterm and low birth weight infants subsequent to CIS diagnosis and treatment. Treatments included no therapy, dilation and curettage or endocervical curettage, cryosurgery or laser vaporization, and conization. Results: Women with CIS who were not treated with conization had a small increased risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0, 2.0) and no increased risk of low birth weight infant (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7, 1.6), compared with women without CIS, after adjusting for maternal smoking, race, parity, marital status, and history of induced pregnancy termination. Women with CIS who had conization were more likely to deliver premature infants (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.0) than women without CIS, after adjusting for the same confounding factors. The apparently increased risk of low birth weight (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4, 2.4) seemed to be a reflection of premature delivery. Conclusion: The risk of prematurity increased after conization for CIS and did not increase when women with CIS had other procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-212
Number of pages6
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume93
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1999

Fingerprint

Carcinoma in Situ
Pregnancy Outcome
Conization
Low Birth Weight Infant
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Birth Certificates
Curettage
Reproductive History
Cryosurgery
Premature Birth
Marital Status
Laser Therapy
Parity
Premature Infants
Dilatation
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Smoking
Mothers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome. / El-Bastawissi, Amira Y.; Becker, Thomas; Daling, Janet R.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 93, No. 2, 02.1999, p. 207-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

El-Bastawissi, Amira Y. ; Becker, Thomas ; Daling, Janet R. / Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999 ; Vol. 93, No. 2. pp. 207-212.
@article{74e5e270653544b38111bd1c1c28e730,
title = "Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the effect of cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) and its management on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Methods: We used a population-based retrospective cohort design that included record linkage between cancer data and birth records. The Cancer Surveillance System records of women with CIS (n = 1851, 312 diagnosed during pregnancy) diagnosed between 1984 and 1992, were linked to birth certificates of their first subsequent deliveries after CIS diagnosis. The comparison group (n = 9201) was a random sample of women without CIS who gave birth during the same years. The outcome measures were preterm and low birth weight infants subsequent to CIS diagnosis and treatment. Treatments included no therapy, dilation and curettage or endocervical curettage, cryosurgery or laser vaporization, and conization. Results: Women with CIS who were not treated with conization had a small increased risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.0, 2.0) and no increased risk of low birth weight infant (OR 1.0, 95{\%} CI 0.7, 1.6), compared with women without CIS, after adjusting for maternal smoking, race, parity, marital status, and history of induced pregnancy termination. Women with CIS who had conization were more likely to deliver premature infants (OR 1.6, 95{\%} CI 1.2, 2.0) than women without CIS, after adjusting for the same confounding factors. The apparently increased risk of low birth weight (OR 1.8, 95{\%} CI 1.4, 2.4) seemed to be a reflection of premature delivery. Conclusion: The risk of prematurity increased after conization for CIS and did not increase when women with CIS had other procedures.",
author = "El-Bastawissi, {Amira Y.} and Thomas Becker and Daling, {Janet R.}",
year = "1999",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00386-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "207--212",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome

AU - El-Bastawissi, Amira Y.

AU - Becker, Thomas

AU - Daling, Janet R.

PY - 1999/2

Y1 - 1999/2

N2 - Objective: To assess the effect of cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) and its management on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Methods: We used a population-based retrospective cohort design that included record linkage between cancer data and birth records. The Cancer Surveillance System records of women with CIS (n = 1851, 312 diagnosed during pregnancy) diagnosed between 1984 and 1992, were linked to birth certificates of their first subsequent deliveries after CIS diagnosis. The comparison group (n = 9201) was a random sample of women without CIS who gave birth during the same years. The outcome measures were preterm and low birth weight infants subsequent to CIS diagnosis and treatment. Treatments included no therapy, dilation and curettage or endocervical curettage, cryosurgery or laser vaporization, and conization. Results: Women with CIS who were not treated with conization had a small increased risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0, 2.0) and no increased risk of low birth weight infant (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7, 1.6), compared with women without CIS, after adjusting for maternal smoking, race, parity, marital status, and history of induced pregnancy termination. Women with CIS who had conization were more likely to deliver premature infants (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.0) than women without CIS, after adjusting for the same confounding factors. The apparently increased risk of low birth weight (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4, 2.4) seemed to be a reflection of premature delivery. Conclusion: The risk of prematurity increased after conization for CIS and did not increase when women with CIS had other procedures.

AB - Objective: To assess the effect of cervical carcinoma in situ (CIS) and its management on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Methods: We used a population-based retrospective cohort design that included record linkage between cancer data and birth records. The Cancer Surveillance System records of women with CIS (n = 1851, 312 diagnosed during pregnancy) diagnosed between 1984 and 1992, were linked to birth certificates of their first subsequent deliveries after CIS diagnosis. The comparison group (n = 9201) was a random sample of women without CIS who gave birth during the same years. The outcome measures were preterm and low birth weight infants subsequent to CIS diagnosis and treatment. Treatments included no therapy, dilation and curettage or endocervical curettage, cryosurgery or laser vaporization, and conization. Results: Women with CIS who were not treated with conization had a small increased risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0, 2.0) and no increased risk of low birth weight infant (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7, 1.6), compared with women without CIS, after adjusting for maternal smoking, race, parity, marital status, and history of induced pregnancy termination. Women with CIS who had conization were more likely to deliver premature infants (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.0) than women without CIS, after adjusting for the same confounding factors. The apparently increased risk of low birth weight (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4, 2.4) seemed to be a reflection of premature delivery. Conclusion: The risk of prematurity increased after conization for CIS and did not increase when women with CIS had other procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033081458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033081458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00386-X

DO - 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00386-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 9932557

AN - SCOPUS:0033081458

VL - 93

SP - 207

EP - 212

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 2

ER -