Effect of blast trauma and corneal foreign bodies on visual performance

Charles D. Coe, Kraig S. Bower, Dain B. Brooks, Richard Stutzman, Jenna Burka Hammer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate the effect of non-penetrating corneal foreign bodies secondary to explosive blasts on the visual performance of soldiers. Methods. In a prospective, non-interventional study subjective visual performance and objective optical quality of 11 injured eyes with retained corneal foreign bodies were compared with that of 11 normal controls. Visual performance measures consisted of best spectacle-corrected high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA), low-contrast (5%) visual acuity (LCVA), and contrast sensitivity (CS). LCVA was evaluated in two luminance levels (photopic and mesopic) and two glare conditions (with and without glare). Acuity measurements were scored using logMAR notation. Objective optical quality was assessed comparing total root mean square wavefront error (WFE) and percent higher order aberrations. Modulation transfer functions calculated from the wavefront maps were used to predict the results of the psychophysical contrast testing. Results. HCVA of injured eyes (M = -0.03) did not differ significantly (t(20) = 1.56, p = 0.13) when compared with controls (M = -0.09). However, visual performance of injured eyes (M = 0.33) was significantly worse than control eyes (M = 0.11) on photopic LCVA (t(20) = 4.16, p < 0.001), mesopic LCVA(M = 0.44 vs. M = 0.21, t(20) = 3.85, p = 0.001), mesopic LCVA with glare (M = 0.49 vs. M = 0.21, t(20) = 3.66, p = 0.002), and small letter CS (M = 0.25 vs. M = 0.90, t(20) = -6.6, p < 0.001). For a 6-mm pupil, mean absolute WFE attributed to higher order aberrations for the injured eyes was 0.86 μm and 0.59 μm for the control eyes. This difference was significant (t(20) = -2.15, p = 0.044). Conclusions. Although HCVA was no different than the normal controls, visual performance of the injured eyes was significantly worse in terms of LCVA and CS. On average, visual performance can be broadly predicted by the modulation transfer function derived from the subjects' wavefront aberration map.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)604-611
Number of pages8
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume87
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Foreign Bodies
Visual Acuity
Glare
Contrast Sensitivity
Corneal Injuries
Military Personnel
Pupil

Keywords

  • contrast sensitivity
  • military
  • night vision
  • ocular trauma
  • visual acuity
  • wavefront

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of blast trauma and corneal foreign bodies on visual performance. / Coe, Charles D.; Bower, Kraig S.; Brooks, Dain B.; Stutzman, Richard; Hammer, Jenna Burka.

In: Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 87, No. 8, 01.08.2010, p. 604-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coe, Charles D. ; Bower, Kraig S. ; Brooks, Dain B. ; Stutzman, Richard ; Hammer, Jenna Burka. / Effect of blast trauma and corneal foreign bodies on visual performance. In: Optometry and Vision Science. 2010 ; Vol. 87, No. 8. pp. 604-611.
@article{8f0107e61c464efc9202e55d15079f78,
title = "Effect of blast trauma and corneal foreign bodies on visual performance",
abstract = "Purpose. To evaluate the effect of non-penetrating corneal foreign bodies secondary to explosive blasts on the visual performance of soldiers. Methods. In a prospective, non-interventional study subjective visual performance and objective optical quality of 11 injured eyes with retained corneal foreign bodies were compared with that of 11 normal controls. Visual performance measures consisted of best spectacle-corrected high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA), low-contrast (5{\%}) visual acuity (LCVA), and contrast sensitivity (CS). LCVA was evaluated in two luminance levels (photopic and mesopic) and two glare conditions (with and without glare). Acuity measurements were scored using logMAR notation. Objective optical quality was assessed comparing total root mean square wavefront error (WFE) and percent higher order aberrations. Modulation transfer functions calculated from the wavefront maps were used to predict the results of the psychophysical contrast testing. Results. HCVA of injured eyes (M = -0.03) did not differ significantly (t(20) = 1.56, p = 0.13) when compared with controls (M = -0.09). However, visual performance of injured eyes (M = 0.33) was significantly worse than control eyes (M = 0.11) on photopic LCVA (t(20) = 4.16, p < 0.001), mesopic LCVA(M = 0.44 vs. M = 0.21, t(20) = 3.85, p = 0.001), mesopic LCVA with glare (M = 0.49 vs. M = 0.21, t(20) = 3.66, p = 0.002), and small letter CS (M = 0.25 vs. M = 0.90, t(20) = -6.6, p < 0.001). For a 6-mm pupil, mean absolute WFE attributed to higher order aberrations for the injured eyes was 0.86 μm and 0.59 μm for the control eyes. This difference was significant (t(20) = -2.15, p = 0.044). Conclusions. Although HCVA was no different than the normal controls, visual performance of the injured eyes was significantly worse in terms of LCVA and CS. On average, visual performance can be broadly predicted by the modulation transfer function derived from the subjects' wavefront aberration map.",
keywords = "contrast sensitivity, military, night vision, ocular trauma, visual acuity, wavefront",
author = "Coe, {Charles D.} and Bower, {Kraig S.} and Brooks, {Dain B.} and Richard Stutzman and Hammer, {Jenna Burka}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181e61bc0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "604--611",
journal = "Optometry and Vision Science",
issn = "1040-5488",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of blast trauma and corneal foreign bodies on visual performance

AU - Coe, Charles D.

AU - Bower, Kraig S.

AU - Brooks, Dain B.

AU - Stutzman, Richard

AU - Hammer, Jenna Burka

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - Purpose. To evaluate the effect of non-penetrating corneal foreign bodies secondary to explosive blasts on the visual performance of soldiers. Methods. In a prospective, non-interventional study subjective visual performance and objective optical quality of 11 injured eyes with retained corneal foreign bodies were compared with that of 11 normal controls. Visual performance measures consisted of best spectacle-corrected high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA), low-contrast (5%) visual acuity (LCVA), and contrast sensitivity (CS). LCVA was evaluated in two luminance levels (photopic and mesopic) and two glare conditions (with and without glare). Acuity measurements were scored using logMAR notation. Objective optical quality was assessed comparing total root mean square wavefront error (WFE) and percent higher order aberrations. Modulation transfer functions calculated from the wavefront maps were used to predict the results of the psychophysical contrast testing. Results. HCVA of injured eyes (M = -0.03) did not differ significantly (t(20) = 1.56, p = 0.13) when compared with controls (M = -0.09). However, visual performance of injured eyes (M = 0.33) was significantly worse than control eyes (M = 0.11) on photopic LCVA (t(20) = 4.16, p < 0.001), mesopic LCVA(M = 0.44 vs. M = 0.21, t(20) = 3.85, p = 0.001), mesopic LCVA with glare (M = 0.49 vs. M = 0.21, t(20) = 3.66, p = 0.002), and small letter CS (M = 0.25 vs. M = 0.90, t(20) = -6.6, p < 0.001). For a 6-mm pupil, mean absolute WFE attributed to higher order aberrations for the injured eyes was 0.86 μm and 0.59 μm for the control eyes. This difference was significant (t(20) = -2.15, p = 0.044). Conclusions. Although HCVA was no different than the normal controls, visual performance of the injured eyes was significantly worse in terms of LCVA and CS. On average, visual performance can be broadly predicted by the modulation transfer function derived from the subjects' wavefront aberration map.

AB - Purpose. To evaluate the effect of non-penetrating corneal foreign bodies secondary to explosive blasts on the visual performance of soldiers. Methods. In a prospective, non-interventional study subjective visual performance and objective optical quality of 11 injured eyes with retained corneal foreign bodies were compared with that of 11 normal controls. Visual performance measures consisted of best spectacle-corrected high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA), low-contrast (5%) visual acuity (LCVA), and contrast sensitivity (CS). LCVA was evaluated in two luminance levels (photopic and mesopic) and two glare conditions (with and without glare). Acuity measurements were scored using logMAR notation. Objective optical quality was assessed comparing total root mean square wavefront error (WFE) and percent higher order aberrations. Modulation transfer functions calculated from the wavefront maps were used to predict the results of the psychophysical contrast testing. Results. HCVA of injured eyes (M = -0.03) did not differ significantly (t(20) = 1.56, p = 0.13) when compared with controls (M = -0.09). However, visual performance of injured eyes (M = 0.33) was significantly worse than control eyes (M = 0.11) on photopic LCVA (t(20) = 4.16, p < 0.001), mesopic LCVA(M = 0.44 vs. M = 0.21, t(20) = 3.85, p = 0.001), mesopic LCVA with glare (M = 0.49 vs. M = 0.21, t(20) = 3.66, p = 0.002), and small letter CS (M = 0.25 vs. M = 0.90, t(20) = -6.6, p < 0.001). For a 6-mm pupil, mean absolute WFE attributed to higher order aberrations for the injured eyes was 0.86 μm and 0.59 μm for the control eyes. This difference was significant (t(20) = -2.15, p = 0.044). Conclusions. Although HCVA was no different than the normal controls, visual performance of the injured eyes was significantly worse in terms of LCVA and CS. On average, visual performance can be broadly predicted by the modulation transfer function derived from the subjects' wavefront aberration map.

KW - contrast sensitivity

KW - military

KW - night vision

KW - ocular trauma

KW - visual acuity

KW - wavefront

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955473537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955473537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181e61bc0

DO - 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181e61bc0

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 604

EP - 611

JO - Optometry and Vision Science

JF - Optometry and Vision Science

SN - 1040-5488

IS - 8

ER -