Educational content and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination reminders

Katrina Armstrong, Michelle Berlin, J. Sanford Schwartz, Kathleen Propert, Peter A. Ubel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a mailed patient education brochure (addressing demonstrated reasons for vaccination refusal) would result in a higher rate of influenza vaccination than a mailed postcard reminder without educational content. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Urban, predominantly African-American, low-income community. PARTICIPANTS: There were 740 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years and older in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Receipt of influenza vaccination and beliefs about influenza and influenza vaccination were measured by telephone survey self-report. MAIN RESULTS: We successfully contacted 202 individuals (69.9%) who received the postcard reminder and 229 individuals (71.1%) who received the educational brochure. People receiving the educational brochure were more likely to report influenza vaccination during the previous vaccination season than those who received the postcard reminder (66.4% vs 56.9%, p = .04). They also reported more interest in influenza vaccination in the coming year. (66.5% vs 57.1%, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: A mailed educational brochure is more effective than a simple reminder in increasing influenza vaccination rates among inner- city, elderly patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)695-698
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Human Influenza
Vaccination
Pamphlets
Independent Living
Patient Education
Telephone
African Americans
Self Report
Randomized Controlled Trials
Postcards

Keywords

  • Educational reminder
  • Elderly
  • Influenza
  • Inner-city population
  • Vaccination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Educational content and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination reminders. / Armstrong, Katrina; Berlin, Michelle; Schwartz, J. Sanford; Propert, Kathleen; Ubel, Peter A.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 11, 1999, p. 695-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Armstrong, Katrina ; Berlin, Michelle ; Schwartz, J. Sanford ; Propert, Kathleen ; Ubel, Peter A. / Educational content and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination reminders. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 14, No. 11. pp. 695-698.
@article{1c8baa59c664434cab80ac4256fc9a3f,
title = "Educational content and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination reminders",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine if a mailed patient education brochure (addressing demonstrated reasons for vaccination refusal) would result in a higher rate of influenza vaccination than a mailed postcard reminder without educational content. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Urban, predominantly African-American, low-income community. PARTICIPANTS: There were 740 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years and older in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Receipt of influenza vaccination and beliefs about influenza and influenza vaccination were measured by telephone survey self-report. MAIN RESULTS: We successfully contacted 202 individuals (69.9{\%}) who received the postcard reminder and 229 individuals (71.1{\%}) who received the educational brochure. People receiving the educational brochure were more likely to report influenza vaccination during the previous vaccination season than those who received the postcard reminder (66.4{\%} vs 56.9{\%}, p = .04). They also reported more interest in influenza vaccination in the coming year. (66.5{\%} vs 57.1{\%}, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: A mailed educational brochure is more effective than a simple reminder in increasing influenza vaccination rates among inner- city, elderly patients.",
keywords = "Educational reminder, Elderly, Influenza, Inner-city population, Vaccination",
author = "Katrina Armstrong and Michelle Berlin and Schwartz, {J. Sanford} and Kathleen Propert and Ubel, {Peter A.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.11098.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "695--698",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Educational content and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination reminders

AU - Armstrong, Katrina

AU - Berlin, Michelle

AU - Schwartz, J. Sanford

AU - Propert, Kathleen

AU - Ubel, Peter A.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine if a mailed patient education brochure (addressing demonstrated reasons for vaccination refusal) would result in a higher rate of influenza vaccination than a mailed postcard reminder without educational content. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Urban, predominantly African-American, low-income community. PARTICIPANTS: There were 740 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years and older in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Receipt of influenza vaccination and beliefs about influenza and influenza vaccination were measured by telephone survey self-report. MAIN RESULTS: We successfully contacted 202 individuals (69.9%) who received the postcard reminder and 229 individuals (71.1%) who received the educational brochure. People receiving the educational brochure were more likely to report influenza vaccination during the previous vaccination season than those who received the postcard reminder (66.4% vs 56.9%, p = .04). They also reported more interest in influenza vaccination in the coming year. (66.5% vs 57.1%, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: A mailed educational brochure is more effective than a simple reminder in increasing influenza vaccination rates among inner- city, elderly patients.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine if a mailed patient education brochure (addressing demonstrated reasons for vaccination refusal) would result in a higher rate of influenza vaccination than a mailed postcard reminder without educational content. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Urban, predominantly African-American, low-income community. PARTICIPANTS: There were 740 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years and older in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Receipt of influenza vaccination and beliefs about influenza and influenza vaccination were measured by telephone survey self-report. MAIN RESULTS: We successfully contacted 202 individuals (69.9%) who received the postcard reminder and 229 individuals (71.1%) who received the educational brochure. People receiving the educational brochure were more likely to report influenza vaccination during the previous vaccination season than those who received the postcard reminder (66.4% vs 56.9%, p = .04). They also reported more interest in influenza vaccination in the coming year. (66.5% vs 57.1%, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: A mailed educational brochure is more effective than a simple reminder in increasing influenza vaccination rates among inner- city, elderly patients.

KW - Educational reminder

KW - Elderly

KW - Influenza

KW - Inner-city population

KW - Vaccination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032710331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032710331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.11098.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.11098.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 10571718

AN - SCOPUS:0032710331

VL - 14

SP - 695

EP - 698

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 11

ER -