ED handoffs: Observed practices and communication errors

Brandon Maughan, Lei Lei, Rita K. Cydulka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The study objectives were to identify emergency department (ED) handoff practices and describe handoff communication errors among emergency physicians. Methods: Two investigators observed patient handoffs among emergency physicians in a major metropolitan teaching hospital for 8 weeks. A data collection form was designed to assess handoff characteristics including duration, location, interruptions, and topics including examination, laboratory examinations, diagnosis, and disposition. Handoff errors were defined as clinically significant examination or laboratory findings in physician documentation that were reported significantly differently during or omitted from verbal handoff. Multivariate negative binomial regression models assessed variables associated with these errors. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results: One hundred ten handoff sessions encompassing 992 patients were observed. Examination handoff errors and omissions were noted in 130 (13.1%) and 447 (45.1%) handoffs, respectively. More examination errors were associated with longer handoff time per patient, whereas fewer examination omissions were associated with use of written or electronic support materials. Laboratory handoff errors and omissions were noted in 37 (3.7%) and 290 (29.2%) handoffs, respectively. Fewer laboratory errors were associated with use of electronic support tools, whereas more laboratory handoff omissions were associated with longer ED lengths of stay. Conclusions: Clinically pertinent findings reported in ED physician handoff often differ from findings reported in physician documentation. These errors and omissions are associated with handoff time per patient, ED length of stay, and use of support materials. Future research should focus on ED handoff standardization protocols, handoff error reduction techniques, and the impact of handoff on patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-511
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Communication
Physicians
Documentation
Length of Stay
Patient Handoff
Emergencies
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Research Ethics Committees
Urban Hospitals
Statistical Models
Teaching Hospitals
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

ED handoffs : Observed practices and communication errors. / Maughan, Brandon; Lei, Lei; Cydulka, Rita K.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 5, 01.06.2011, p. 502-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maughan, Brandon ; Lei, Lei ; Cydulka, Rita K. / ED handoffs : Observed practices and communication errors. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 502-511.
@article{01d52cf5fd8646aebfe8939bf0cd4041,
title = "ED handoffs: Observed practices and communication errors",
abstract = "Objective: The study objectives were to identify emergency department (ED) handoff practices and describe handoff communication errors among emergency physicians. Methods: Two investigators observed patient handoffs among emergency physicians in a major metropolitan teaching hospital for 8 weeks. A data collection form was designed to assess handoff characteristics including duration, location, interruptions, and topics including examination, laboratory examinations, diagnosis, and disposition. Handoff errors were defined as clinically significant examination or laboratory findings in physician documentation that were reported significantly differently during or omitted from verbal handoff. Multivariate negative binomial regression models assessed variables associated with these errors. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results: One hundred ten handoff sessions encompassing 992 patients were observed. Examination handoff errors and omissions were noted in 130 (13.1{\%}) and 447 (45.1{\%}) handoffs, respectively. More examination errors were associated with longer handoff time per patient, whereas fewer examination omissions were associated with use of written or electronic support materials. Laboratory handoff errors and omissions were noted in 37 (3.7{\%}) and 290 (29.2{\%}) handoffs, respectively. Fewer laboratory errors were associated with use of electronic support tools, whereas more laboratory handoff omissions were associated with longer ED lengths of stay. Conclusions: Clinically pertinent findings reported in ED physician handoff often differ from findings reported in physician documentation. These errors and omissions are associated with handoff time per patient, ED length of stay, and use of support materials. Future research should focus on ED handoff standardization protocols, handoff error reduction techniques, and the impact of handoff on patient outcomes.",
author = "Brandon Maughan and Lei Lei and Cydulka, {Rita K.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "502--511",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ED handoffs

T2 - Observed practices and communication errors

AU - Maughan, Brandon

AU - Lei, Lei

AU - Cydulka, Rita K.

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Objective: The study objectives were to identify emergency department (ED) handoff practices and describe handoff communication errors among emergency physicians. Methods: Two investigators observed patient handoffs among emergency physicians in a major metropolitan teaching hospital for 8 weeks. A data collection form was designed to assess handoff characteristics including duration, location, interruptions, and topics including examination, laboratory examinations, diagnosis, and disposition. Handoff errors were defined as clinically significant examination or laboratory findings in physician documentation that were reported significantly differently during or omitted from verbal handoff. Multivariate negative binomial regression models assessed variables associated with these errors. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results: One hundred ten handoff sessions encompassing 992 patients were observed. Examination handoff errors and omissions were noted in 130 (13.1%) and 447 (45.1%) handoffs, respectively. More examination errors were associated with longer handoff time per patient, whereas fewer examination omissions were associated with use of written or electronic support materials. Laboratory handoff errors and omissions were noted in 37 (3.7%) and 290 (29.2%) handoffs, respectively. Fewer laboratory errors were associated with use of electronic support tools, whereas more laboratory handoff omissions were associated with longer ED lengths of stay. Conclusions: Clinically pertinent findings reported in ED physician handoff often differ from findings reported in physician documentation. These errors and omissions are associated with handoff time per patient, ED length of stay, and use of support materials. Future research should focus on ED handoff standardization protocols, handoff error reduction techniques, and the impact of handoff on patient outcomes.

AB - Objective: The study objectives were to identify emergency department (ED) handoff practices and describe handoff communication errors among emergency physicians. Methods: Two investigators observed patient handoffs among emergency physicians in a major metropolitan teaching hospital for 8 weeks. A data collection form was designed to assess handoff characteristics including duration, location, interruptions, and topics including examination, laboratory examinations, diagnosis, and disposition. Handoff errors were defined as clinically significant examination or laboratory findings in physician documentation that were reported significantly differently during or omitted from verbal handoff. Multivariate negative binomial regression models assessed variables associated with these errors. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Results: One hundred ten handoff sessions encompassing 992 patients were observed. Examination handoff errors and omissions were noted in 130 (13.1%) and 447 (45.1%) handoffs, respectively. More examination errors were associated with longer handoff time per patient, whereas fewer examination omissions were associated with use of written or electronic support materials. Laboratory handoff errors and omissions were noted in 37 (3.7%) and 290 (29.2%) handoffs, respectively. Fewer laboratory errors were associated with use of electronic support tools, whereas more laboratory handoff omissions were associated with longer ED lengths of stay. Conclusions: Clinically pertinent findings reported in ED physician handoff often differ from findings reported in physician documentation. These errors and omissions are associated with handoff time per patient, ED length of stay, and use of support materials. Future research should focus on ED handoff standardization protocols, handoff error reduction techniques, and the impact of handoff on patient outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958068519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958068519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 20825820

AN - SCOPUS:79958068519

VL - 29

SP - 502

EP - 511

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 5

ER -