Dyadic Interviews as a Tool for Qualitative Evaluation

David L. Morgan, Susan Eliot, Robert (Bob) Lowe, Paul Gorman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although evaluation researchers frequently make use of focus groups and individual interviews as sources of qualitative data, there has been far less attention to dyadic interviews that create a conversation between two research participants. This article describes dyadic interviews as a format that shares many of the advantages of focus groups, in terms of the interaction between the participants, at the same time that it minimizes problems related to bringing a number of participants together in the same place at the same. We illustrate the uses of dyadic interviews by describing the evaluation of a program where rural physicians were assisted in the adoption of electronic health records systems. We conclude by considering some of the possible future directions for developing dyadic interviews as a method in evaluation research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-117
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Interviews
interview
evaluation
Focus Groups
evaluation research
Electronic Health Records
Information Storage and Retrieval
Program Evaluation
conversation
Group
physician
Research Personnel
Evaluation
electronics
Physicians
interaction
health
Research
Focus groups

Keywords

  • dyadic interviews
  • electronic health records
  • focus groups
  • physicians
  • qualitative methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Psychology
  • Business and International Management
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Dyadic Interviews as a Tool for Qualitative Evaluation. / Morgan, David L.; Eliot, Susan; Lowe, Robert (Bob); Gorman, Paul.

In: American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2016, p. 109-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{188fe99420cd47e09727fbb5daca5d1d,
title = "Dyadic Interviews as a Tool for Qualitative Evaluation",
abstract = "Although evaluation researchers frequently make use of focus groups and individual interviews as sources of qualitative data, there has been far less attention to dyadic interviews that create a conversation between two research participants. This article describes dyadic interviews as a format that shares many of the advantages of focus groups, in terms of the interaction between the participants, at the same time that it minimizes problems related to bringing a number of participants together in the same place at the same. We illustrate the uses of dyadic interviews by describing the evaluation of a program where rural physicians were assisted in the adoption of electronic health records systems. We conclude by considering some of the possible future directions for developing dyadic interviews as a method in evaluation research.",
keywords = "dyadic interviews, electronic health records, focus groups, physicians, qualitative methods",
author = "Morgan, {David L.} and Susan Eliot and Lowe, {Robert (Bob)} and Paul Gorman",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/1098214015611244",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "109--117",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dyadic Interviews as a Tool for Qualitative Evaluation

AU - Morgan, David L.

AU - Eliot, Susan

AU - Lowe, Robert (Bob)

AU - Gorman, Paul

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Although evaluation researchers frequently make use of focus groups and individual interviews as sources of qualitative data, there has been far less attention to dyadic interviews that create a conversation between two research participants. This article describes dyadic interviews as a format that shares many of the advantages of focus groups, in terms of the interaction between the participants, at the same time that it minimizes problems related to bringing a number of participants together in the same place at the same. We illustrate the uses of dyadic interviews by describing the evaluation of a program where rural physicians were assisted in the adoption of electronic health records systems. We conclude by considering some of the possible future directions for developing dyadic interviews as a method in evaluation research.

AB - Although evaluation researchers frequently make use of focus groups and individual interviews as sources of qualitative data, there has been far less attention to dyadic interviews that create a conversation between two research participants. This article describes dyadic interviews as a format that shares many of the advantages of focus groups, in terms of the interaction between the participants, at the same time that it minimizes problems related to bringing a number of participants together in the same place at the same. We illustrate the uses of dyadic interviews by describing the evaluation of a program where rural physicians were assisted in the adoption of electronic health records systems. We conclude by considering some of the possible future directions for developing dyadic interviews as a method in evaluation research.

KW - dyadic interviews

KW - electronic health records

KW - focus groups

KW - physicians

KW - qualitative methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990348438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990348438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098214015611244

DO - 10.1177/1098214015611244

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84990348438

VL - 37

SP - 109

EP - 117

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 1

ER -