Durability of hearing preservation after microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma using the middle cranial fossa approach

Clinical article

Anthony C. Wang, Steven B. Chinn, Khoi Than, H. Alexander Arts, Steven A. Telian, Hussam K. El-Kashlan, B. Gregory Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. The middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach is a microsurgical technique described as a primary option in the treatment of small, intracanalicular schwannomas involving the eighth cranial nerve. Excellent rates of complete tumor resection, hearing preservation, preservation of facial nerve function, and low complication rates have been reproduced using this technique. However, the durability of hearing preservation attained using the various treatment options has not been adequately assessed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the durability of long-term hearing preservation in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated via the MCF approach. The authors hypothesize that hearing preservation in these patients will prove to be durable years after treatment in a high percentage of cases. Methods. Retrospective medical chart review was performed in 103 consecutive patients undergoing resection of VS via a modified MCF approach between 1999 and 2008. Patients in whom surgical goals were gross-total resection and hearing preservation were included. Preoperative and postoperative hearing assessment was performed using standard audiometric testing, and classified according to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) guidelines as a primary outcome measure. Outcomes and neurological complications initially, and at 1, 3, and 5 years following operation were analyzed. Results. Initial hearing preservation rates were in keeping with the best previously published results. At initial postoperative audiometric follow-up, of the patients presenting with Class A hearing, 67% remained Class A, 17% were Class B, 1% were Class C, and 15% were Class D. Of patients presenting with Class B hearing, 24% were Class A, 53% remained Class B, 6% were Class C, and 18% were Class D. Of patients presenting with Class C hearing, 100% remained Class C. To assess the durability of hearing preservation in our patients, the authors evaluated hearing function at regular intervals after the initial postoperative audiometric follow-up. Audiometric data were available for 56 patients at 5-year follow-up. Of the 20 patients with Class A hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, 13 (65%) remained Class A, 6 (30%) were Class B, and 1 (5%) was Class C. Of the 12 patients with Class B hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, 4 (33%) were Class A, 4 (33%) remained Class B, and 4 (33%) were Class C. Of the 3 patients with Class C hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, all 3 (100%) remained Class C. Conclusions. A majority of patients with preserved hearing following the MCF approach for treatment of VS experience durability of their preserved hearing at 5-year follow-up. The initial AAO-HNS classification was preserved in 13 (65%) of the 20 patients who had Class A hearing at 5 years, and in 8 (67%) of the 12 who had Class B hearing at 5 years. Overall, a decline in AAO-HNS classification was noted in 15% of patients with preserved Class A hearing, and in 33% of those with preserved Class B hearing. Facial nerve function was preserved in 91% of cases. Superior hearing preservation as well as good outcomes in facial nerve function and few serious complications can be accomplished using the MCF approach for resection of small VSs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-138
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery
Volume119
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Middle Cranial Fossa
Acoustic Neuroma
Hearing
Therapeutics
Facial Nerve
Otolaryngology
Neck
Head

Keywords

  • Hearing preservation
  • Middle cranial fossa
  • Vestibular schwannoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Durability of hearing preservation after microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma using the middle cranial fossa approach : Clinical article. / Wang, Anthony C.; Chinn, Steven B.; Than, Khoi; Arts, H. Alexander; Telian, Steven A.; El-Kashlan, Hussam K.; Thompson, B. Gregory.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 119, No. 1, 07.2013, p. 131-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, Anthony C. ; Chinn, Steven B. ; Than, Khoi ; Arts, H. Alexander ; Telian, Steven A. ; El-Kashlan, Hussam K. ; Thompson, B. Gregory. / Durability of hearing preservation after microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma using the middle cranial fossa approach : Clinical article. In: Journal of Neurosurgery. 2013 ; Vol. 119, No. 1. pp. 131-138.
@article{274a94b0c73c4e2d967b2553a3278c2b,
title = "Durability of hearing preservation after microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma using the middle cranial fossa approach: Clinical article",
abstract = "Object. The middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach is a microsurgical technique described as a primary option in the treatment of small, intracanalicular schwannomas involving the eighth cranial nerve. Excellent rates of complete tumor resection, hearing preservation, preservation of facial nerve function, and low complication rates have been reproduced using this technique. However, the durability of hearing preservation attained using the various treatment options has not been adequately assessed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the durability of long-term hearing preservation in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated via the MCF approach. The authors hypothesize that hearing preservation in these patients will prove to be durable years after treatment in a high percentage of cases. Methods. Retrospective medical chart review was performed in 103 consecutive patients undergoing resection of VS via a modified MCF approach between 1999 and 2008. Patients in whom surgical goals were gross-total resection and hearing preservation were included. Preoperative and postoperative hearing assessment was performed using standard audiometric testing, and classified according to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) guidelines as a primary outcome measure. Outcomes and neurological complications initially, and at 1, 3, and 5 years following operation were analyzed. Results. Initial hearing preservation rates were in keeping with the best previously published results. At initial postoperative audiometric follow-up, of the patients presenting with Class A hearing, 67{\%} remained Class A, 17{\%} were Class B, 1{\%} were Class C, and 15{\%} were Class D. Of patients presenting with Class B hearing, 24{\%} were Class A, 53{\%} remained Class B, 6{\%} were Class C, and 18{\%} were Class D. Of patients presenting with Class C hearing, 100{\%} remained Class C. To assess the durability of hearing preservation in our patients, the authors evaluated hearing function at regular intervals after the initial postoperative audiometric follow-up. Audiometric data were available for 56 patients at 5-year follow-up. Of the 20 patients with Class A hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, 13 (65{\%}) remained Class A, 6 (30{\%}) were Class B, and 1 (5{\%}) was Class C. Of the 12 patients with Class B hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, 4 (33{\%}) were Class A, 4 (33{\%}) remained Class B, and 4 (33{\%}) were Class C. Of the 3 patients with Class C hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, all 3 (100{\%}) remained Class C. Conclusions. A majority of patients with preserved hearing following the MCF approach for treatment of VS experience durability of their preserved hearing at 5-year follow-up. The initial AAO-HNS classification was preserved in 13 (65{\%}) of the 20 patients who had Class A hearing at 5 years, and in 8 (67{\%}) of the 12 who had Class B hearing at 5 years. Overall, a decline in AAO-HNS classification was noted in 15{\%} of patients with preserved Class A hearing, and in 33{\%} of those with preserved Class B hearing. Facial nerve function was preserved in 91{\%} of cases. Superior hearing preservation as well as good outcomes in facial nerve function and few serious complications can be accomplished using the MCF approach for resection of small VSs.",
keywords = "Hearing preservation, Middle cranial fossa, Vestibular schwannoma",
author = "Wang, {Anthony C.} and Chinn, {Steven B.} and Khoi Than and Arts, {H. Alexander} and Telian, {Steven A.} and El-Kashlan, {Hussam K.} and Thompson, {B. Gregory}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3171/2013.1.JNS1297",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "131--138",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Durability of hearing preservation after microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma using the middle cranial fossa approach

T2 - Clinical article

AU - Wang, Anthony C.

AU - Chinn, Steven B.

AU - Than, Khoi

AU - Arts, H. Alexander

AU - Telian, Steven A.

AU - El-Kashlan, Hussam K.

AU - Thompson, B. Gregory

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Object. The middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach is a microsurgical technique described as a primary option in the treatment of small, intracanalicular schwannomas involving the eighth cranial nerve. Excellent rates of complete tumor resection, hearing preservation, preservation of facial nerve function, and low complication rates have been reproduced using this technique. However, the durability of hearing preservation attained using the various treatment options has not been adequately assessed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the durability of long-term hearing preservation in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated via the MCF approach. The authors hypothesize that hearing preservation in these patients will prove to be durable years after treatment in a high percentage of cases. Methods. Retrospective medical chart review was performed in 103 consecutive patients undergoing resection of VS via a modified MCF approach between 1999 and 2008. Patients in whom surgical goals were gross-total resection and hearing preservation were included. Preoperative and postoperative hearing assessment was performed using standard audiometric testing, and classified according to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) guidelines as a primary outcome measure. Outcomes and neurological complications initially, and at 1, 3, and 5 years following operation were analyzed. Results. Initial hearing preservation rates were in keeping with the best previously published results. At initial postoperative audiometric follow-up, of the patients presenting with Class A hearing, 67% remained Class A, 17% were Class B, 1% were Class C, and 15% were Class D. Of patients presenting with Class B hearing, 24% were Class A, 53% remained Class B, 6% were Class C, and 18% were Class D. Of patients presenting with Class C hearing, 100% remained Class C. To assess the durability of hearing preservation in our patients, the authors evaluated hearing function at regular intervals after the initial postoperative audiometric follow-up. Audiometric data were available for 56 patients at 5-year follow-up. Of the 20 patients with Class A hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, 13 (65%) remained Class A, 6 (30%) were Class B, and 1 (5%) was Class C. Of the 12 patients with Class B hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, 4 (33%) were Class A, 4 (33%) remained Class B, and 4 (33%) were Class C. Of the 3 patients with Class C hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, all 3 (100%) remained Class C. Conclusions. A majority of patients with preserved hearing following the MCF approach for treatment of VS experience durability of their preserved hearing at 5-year follow-up. The initial AAO-HNS classification was preserved in 13 (65%) of the 20 patients who had Class A hearing at 5 years, and in 8 (67%) of the 12 who had Class B hearing at 5 years. Overall, a decline in AAO-HNS classification was noted in 15% of patients with preserved Class A hearing, and in 33% of those with preserved Class B hearing. Facial nerve function was preserved in 91% of cases. Superior hearing preservation as well as good outcomes in facial nerve function and few serious complications can be accomplished using the MCF approach for resection of small VSs.

AB - Object. The middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach is a microsurgical technique described as a primary option in the treatment of small, intracanalicular schwannomas involving the eighth cranial nerve. Excellent rates of complete tumor resection, hearing preservation, preservation of facial nerve function, and low complication rates have been reproduced using this technique. However, the durability of hearing preservation attained using the various treatment options has not been adequately assessed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the durability of long-term hearing preservation in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated via the MCF approach. The authors hypothesize that hearing preservation in these patients will prove to be durable years after treatment in a high percentage of cases. Methods. Retrospective medical chart review was performed in 103 consecutive patients undergoing resection of VS via a modified MCF approach between 1999 and 2008. Patients in whom surgical goals were gross-total resection and hearing preservation were included. Preoperative and postoperative hearing assessment was performed using standard audiometric testing, and classified according to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) guidelines as a primary outcome measure. Outcomes and neurological complications initially, and at 1, 3, and 5 years following operation were analyzed. Results. Initial hearing preservation rates were in keeping with the best previously published results. At initial postoperative audiometric follow-up, of the patients presenting with Class A hearing, 67% remained Class A, 17% were Class B, 1% were Class C, and 15% were Class D. Of patients presenting with Class B hearing, 24% were Class A, 53% remained Class B, 6% were Class C, and 18% were Class D. Of patients presenting with Class C hearing, 100% remained Class C. To assess the durability of hearing preservation in our patients, the authors evaluated hearing function at regular intervals after the initial postoperative audiometric follow-up. Audiometric data were available for 56 patients at 5-year follow-up. Of the 20 patients with Class A hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, 13 (65%) remained Class A, 6 (30%) were Class B, and 1 (5%) was Class C. Of the 12 patients with Class B hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, 4 (33%) were Class A, 4 (33%) remained Class B, and 4 (33%) were Class C. Of the 3 patients with Class C hearing at initial postoperative follow-up with 5-year follow-up, all 3 (100%) remained Class C. Conclusions. A majority of patients with preserved hearing following the MCF approach for treatment of VS experience durability of their preserved hearing at 5-year follow-up. The initial AAO-HNS classification was preserved in 13 (65%) of the 20 patients who had Class A hearing at 5 years, and in 8 (67%) of the 12 who had Class B hearing at 5 years. Overall, a decline in AAO-HNS classification was noted in 15% of patients with preserved Class A hearing, and in 33% of those with preserved Class B hearing. Facial nerve function was preserved in 91% of cases. Superior hearing preservation as well as good outcomes in facial nerve function and few serious complications can be accomplished using the MCF approach for resection of small VSs.

KW - Hearing preservation

KW - Middle cranial fossa

KW - Vestibular schwannoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879991119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879991119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2013.1.JNS1297

DO - 10.3171/2013.1.JNS1297

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 131

EP - 138

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 1

ER -