Duplex ultrasound assessment of femoral venous flow during laparoscopic and open gastric bypass

N. T. Nguyen, M. Cronan, S. Braley, R. Rivers, Bruce Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Pneumoperitoneum (PP) and the reverse Trendelenburg (RT) position have been shown to decrease femoral blood flow, resulting in venous stasis. However the effects of PP and RT on femoral venous flow have not been evaluated in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass (GBP). We analyzed the effects of PP and RT on peak systolic velocity and the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein during laparoscopic and open GBP. We further examined the efficacy of intermittent sequential compression devices in reversing the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity. Methods: Thirty patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40-60 were randomly allocated to under go either laparoscopic (n = 14) or open (n = 16) GBP. A duplex ultrasound examination of the femoral vein was performed at baseline, during PP and combined PP and RT in the laparoscopic group, and at baseline and during RT in the open group. The ultrasound exam was performed first without the use of sequential compression devices and then with the sequential compression devices inflated to 45 mmHg. Results: The two groups were similar in age, sex, BMI, and calf and thigh circumferences. During laparoscopic GBP, PP resulted in a 43% decrease in peak systolic velocity and a 52% increase in the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein; the combination of PP and RT decreased peak systolic velocity to 57% of baseline and increased the femoral cross-sectional area to 121% of baseline. During laparoscopic GBP, the use of sequential compression devices during PP and RT partially reversed the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity, but femoral peak systolic velocity was still lower than baseline by 38%. During open GBP, RT resulted in a 38% reduction in peak systolic velocity and a 69% increase in the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein; the use of sequential compression devices during RT partially reversed these changes by increasing femoral peak systolic velocity by 26%; however, it was still lower than baseline by 22%. Conclusions: Pneumoperitoneum and reverse Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic and open GBP are independent factors for the development of venous stasis. Combining the reverse Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic GBP further reduces femoral peak systolic velocity and hence increases venous stasis. The use of sequential compression devices was partially effective in reversing the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity, but it did not return femoral peak systolic velocity to baseline levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-290
Number of pages6
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastric Bypass
Pneumoperitoneum
Thigh
Femoral Vein
Head-Down Tilt
Equipment and Supplies
Body Mass Index

Keywords

  • Femoral blood flow
  • Intermittent pneumatic compression devices
  • Laparoscopic gastric bypass
  • Morbidly obese patients
  • Pneumoperitoneum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Duplex ultrasound assessment of femoral venous flow during laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. / Nguyen, N. T.; Cronan, M.; Braley, S.; Rivers, R.; Wolfe, Bruce.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.02.2003, p. 285-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{88ed89e15a6b4d43957135818da851d3,
title = "Duplex ultrasound assessment of femoral venous flow during laparoscopic and open gastric bypass",
abstract = "Background: Pneumoperitoneum (PP) and the reverse Trendelenburg (RT) position have been shown to decrease femoral blood flow, resulting in venous stasis. However the effects of PP and RT on femoral venous flow have not been evaluated in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass (GBP). We analyzed the effects of PP and RT on peak systolic velocity and the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein during laparoscopic and open GBP. We further examined the efficacy of intermittent sequential compression devices in reversing the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity. Methods: Thirty patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40-60 were randomly allocated to under go either laparoscopic (n = 14) or open (n = 16) GBP. A duplex ultrasound examination of the femoral vein was performed at baseline, during PP and combined PP and RT in the laparoscopic group, and at baseline and during RT in the open group. The ultrasound exam was performed first without the use of sequential compression devices and then with the sequential compression devices inflated to 45 mmHg. Results: The two groups were similar in age, sex, BMI, and calf and thigh circumferences. During laparoscopic GBP, PP resulted in a 43{\%} decrease in peak systolic velocity and a 52{\%} increase in the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein; the combination of PP and RT decreased peak systolic velocity to 57{\%} of baseline and increased the femoral cross-sectional area to 121{\%} of baseline. During laparoscopic GBP, the use of sequential compression devices during PP and RT partially reversed the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity, but femoral peak systolic velocity was still lower than baseline by 38{\%}. During open GBP, RT resulted in a 38{\%} reduction in peak systolic velocity and a 69{\%} increase in the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein; the use of sequential compression devices during RT partially reversed these changes by increasing femoral peak systolic velocity by 26{\%}; however, it was still lower than baseline by 22{\%}. Conclusions: Pneumoperitoneum and reverse Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic and open GBP are independent factors for the development of venous stasis. Combining the reverse Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic GBP further reduces femoral peak systolic velocity and hence increases venous stasis. The use of sequential compression devices was partially effective in reversing the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity, but it did not return femoral peak systolic velocity to baseline levels.",
keywords = "Femoral blood flow, Intermittent pneumatic compression devices, Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Morbidly obese patients, Pneumoperitoneum",
author = "Nguyen, {N. T.} and M. Cronan and S. Braley and R. Rivers and Bruce Wolfe",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-002-8812-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "285--290",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Duplex ultrasound assessment of femoral venous flow during laparoscopic and open gastric bypass

AU - Nguyen, N. T.

AU - Cronan, M.

AU - Braley, S.

AU - Rivers, R.

AU - Wolfe, Bruce

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - Background: Pneumoperitoneum (PP) and the reverse Trendelenburg (RT) position have been shown to decrease femoral blood flow, resulting in venous stasis. However the effects of PP and RT on femoral venous flow have not been evaluated in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass (GBP). We analyzed the effects of PP and RT on peak systolic velocity and the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein during laparoscopic and open GBP. We further examined the efficacy of intermittent sequential compression devices in reversing the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity. Methods: Thirty patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40-60 were randomly allocated to under go either laparoscopic (n = 14) or open (n = 16) GBP. A duplex ultrasound examination of the femoral vein was performed at baseline, during PP and combined PP and RT in the laparoscopic group, and at baseline and during RT in the open group. The ultrasound exam was performed first without the use of sequential compression devices and then with the sequential compression devices inflated to 45 mmHg. Results: The two groups were similar in age, sex, BMI, and calf and thigh circumferences. During laparoscopic GBP, PP resulted in a 43% decrease in peak systolic velocity and a 52% increase in the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein; the combination of PP and RT decreased peak systolic velocity to 57% of baseline and increased the femoral cross-sectional area to 121% of baseline. During laparoscopic GBP, the use of sequential compression devices during PP and RT partially reversed the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity, but femoral peak systolic velocity was still lower than baseline by 38%. During open GBP, RT resulted in a 38% reduction in peak systolic velocity and a 69% increase in the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein; the use of sequential compression devices during RT partially reversed these changes by increasing femoral peak systolic velocity by 26%; however, it was still lower than baseline by 22%. Conclusions: Pneumoperitoneum and reverse Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic and open GBP are independent factors for the development of venous stasis. Combining the reverse Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic GBP further reduces femoral peak systolic velocity and hence increases venous stasis. The use of sequential compression devices was partially effective in reversing the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity, but it did not return femoral peak systolic velocity to baseline levels.

AB - Background: Pneumoperitoneum (PP) and the reverse Trendelenburg (RT) position have been shown to decrease femoral blood flow, resulting in venous stasis. However the effects of PP and RT on femoral venous flow have not been evaluated in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass (GBP). We analyzed the effects of PP and RT on peak systolic velocity and the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein during laparoscopic and open GBP. We further examined the efficacy of intermittent sequential compression devices in reversing the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity. Methods: Thirty patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40-60 were randomly allocated to under go either laparoscopic (n = 14) or open (n = 16) GBP. A duplex ultrasound examination of the femoral vein was performed at baseline, during PP and combined PP and RT in the laparoscopic group, and at baseline and during RT in the open group. The ultrasound exam was performed first without the use of sequential compression devices and then with the sequential compression devices inflated to 45 mmHg. Results: The two groups were similar in age, sex, BMI, and calf and thigh circumferences. During laparoscopic GBP, PP resulted in a 43% decrease in peak systolic velocity and a 52% increase in the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein; the combination of PP and RT decreased peak systolic velocity to 57% of baseline and increased the femoral cross-sectional area to 121% of baseline. During laparoscopic GBP, the use of sequential compression devices during PP and RT partially reversed the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity, but femoral peak systolic velocity was still lower than baseline by 38%. During open GBP, RT resulted in a 38% reduction in peak systolic velocity and a 69% increase in the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein; the use of sequential compression devices during RT partially reversed these changes by increasing femoral peak systolic velocity by 26%; however, it was still lower than baseline by 22%. Conclusions: Pneumoperitoneum and reverse Trendelenburg position during laparoscopic and open GBP are independent factors for the development of venous stasis. Combining the reverse Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic GBP further reduces femoral peak systolic velocity and hence increases venous stasis. The use of sequential compression devices was partially effective in reversing the reduction of femoral peak systolic velocity, but it did not return femoral peak systolic velocity to baseline levels.

KW - Femoral blood flow

KW - Intermittent pneumatic compression devices

KW - Laparoscopic gastric bypass

KW - Morbidly obese patients

KW - Pneumoperitoneum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037317410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037317410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-002-8812-z

DO - 10.1007/s00464-002-8812-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 12364988

AN - SCOPUS:0037317410

VL - 17

SP - 285

EP - 290

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 2

ER -