Duplex scan characteristics of bypass grafts to mesenteric arteries

Timothy Liem, Jocelyn A. Segall, Wei Wei, Gregory Landry, Lloyd M. Taylor, Gregory (Greg) Moneta

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Mesenteric bypass grafts may be followed postoperatively with duplex scanning. It is unknown, however, if duplex-derived velocity measurements vary over time or if the type of procedure (antegrade vs retrograde) and the caliber of graft affect velocity measurements. The purpose of this study was to characterize duplex findings in mesenteric bypass grafts with respect to the type of revascularization, graft caliber, and changes over time. This study also sought to identify duplex characteristics that could predict subsequent graft failure. Methods: Duplex examinations of mesenteric bypass grafts were reviewed. Peak systolic velocities (PSV) from the inflow artery, proximal anastomosis, mid graft, distal anastomosis, and outflow arteries were analyzed with respect to timing of the examination (index study vs follow-up exam), inflow source, distal target, and graft diameter. The results were compared with analysis of variance (P <.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine any association with mid-graft PSV. Results: Fasting postoperative duplex scans were reviewed from 43 mesenteric bypass grafts in 38 patients (28 superior mesenteric artery [SMA] alone, 3 celiac alone, 5 celiac and SMA, 2 SMA and renal). A total of 167 duplex exams were analyzed (mean of 4.5 studies per patient; range, 1 to 14). Inflow artery velocities were significantly lower in antegrade vs retrograde configurations (93 ± 73 cm/s vs 154 ± 73 cm/s, P <.05); however, proximal and mid-graft PSVs were not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, no effect was noted on mid-graft PSV when distal targets were compared (SMA vs celiac, 149 ± 42 cm/s vs 160 ± 78 cm/s, P = NS). An association between smaller graft diameter and higher mid-graft PSV was seen with univariate analysis (P = .03), with a trend toward significance with multivariate analysis (P = .06). In 18 bypass grafts where a follow-up examination was available >1 year (mean 38 ± 25 months) after the index postoperative exam, velocity did not significantly change over time. No duplex scan characteristics were predictive of graft thrombosis. Conclusion: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to fully characterize duplex-derived flow velocities in mesenteric artery bypass grafts. Although surveillance duplex scans after mesenteric bypass procedures may be affected by graft diameter, they are not significantly affected by the choice of inflow artery. These data can serve as standards for postoperative surveillance of mesenteric bypass grafts.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)922-928
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
    Volume45
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 2007

    Fingerprint

    Mesenteric Arteries
    Transplants
    Arteries
    Analysis of Variance
    Thrombosis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
    • Surgery

    Cite this

    Duplex scan characteristics of bypass grafts to mesenteric arteries. / Liem, Timothy; Segall, Jocelyn A.; Wei, Wei; Landry, Gregory; Taylor, Lloyd M.; Moneta, Gregory (Greg).

    In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 45, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 922-928.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d34c3e157cd0414080ba10143e032da3,
    title = "Duplex scan characteristics of bypass grafts to mesenteric arteries",
    abstract = "Background: Mesenteric bypass grafts may be followed postoperatively with duplex scanning. It is unknown, however, if duplex-derived velocity measurements vary over time or if the type of procedure (antegrade vs retrograde) and the caliber of graft affect velocity measurements. The purpose of this study was to characterize duplex findings in mesenteric bypass grafts with respect to the type of revascularization, graft caliber, and changes over time. This study also sought to identify duplex characteristics that could predict subsequent graft failure. Methods: Duplex examinations of mesenteric bypass grafts were reviewed. Peak systolic velocities (PSV) from the inflow artery, proximal anastomosis, mid graft, distal anastomosis, and outflow arteries were analyzed with respect to timing of the examination (index study vs follow-up exam), inflow source, distal target, and graft diameter. The results were compared with analysis of variance (P <.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine any association with mid-graft PSV. Results: Fasting postoperative duplex scans were reviewed from 43 mesenteric bypass grafts in 38 patients (28 superior mesenteric artery [SMA] alone, 3 celiac alone, 5 celiac and SMA, 2 SMA and renal). A total of 167 duplex exams were analyzed (mean of 4.5 studies per patient; range, 1 to 14). Inflow artery velocities were significantly lower in antegrade vs retrograde configurations (93 ± 73 cm/s vs 154 ± 73 cm/s, P <.05); however, proximal and mid-graft PSVs were not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, no effect was noted on mid-graft PSV when distal targets were compared (SMA vs celiac, 149 ± 42 cm/s vs 160 ± 78 cm/s, P = NS). An association between smaller graft diameter and higher mid-graft PSV was seen with univariate analysis (P = .03), with a trend toward significance with multivariate analysis (P = .06). In 18 bypass grafts where a follow-up examination was available >1 year (mean 38 ± 25 months) after the index postoperative exam, velocity did not significantly change over time. No duplex scan characteristics were predictive of graft thrombosis. Conclusion: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to fully characterize duplex-derived flow velocities in mesenteric artery bypass grafts. Although surveillance duplex scans after mesenteric bypass procedures may be affected by graft diameter, they are not significantly affected by the choice of inflow artery. These data can serve as standards for postoperative surveillance of mesenteric bypass grafts.",
    author = "Timothy Liem and Segall, {Jocelyn A.} and Wei Wei and Gregory Landry and Taylor, {Lloyd M.} and Moneta, {Gregory (Greg)}",
    year = "2007",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.020",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "45",
    pages = "922--928",
    journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
    issn = "0741-5214",
    publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Duplex scan characteristics of bypass grafts to mesenteric arteries

    AU - Liem, Timothy

    AU - Segall, Jocelyn A.

    AU - Wei, Wei

    AU - Landry, Gregory

    AU - Taylor, Lloyd M.

    AU - Moneta, Gregory (Greg)

    PY - 2007/5

    Y1 - 2007/5

    N2 - Background: Mesenteric bypass grafts may be followed postoperatively with duplex scanning. It is unknown, however, if duplex-derived velocity measurements vary over time or if the type of procedure (antegrade vs retrograde) and the caliber of graft affect velocity measurements. The purpose of this study was to characterize duplex findings in mesenteric bypass grafts with respect to the type of revascularization, graft caliber, and changes over time. This study also sought to identify duplex characteristics that could predict subsequent graft failure. Methods: Duplex examinations of mesenteric bypass grafts were reviewed. Peak systolic velocities (PSV) from the inflow artery, proximal anastomosis, mid graft, distal anastomosis, and outflow arteries were analyzed with respect to timing of the examination (index study vs follow-up exam), inflow source, distal target, and graft diameter. The results were compared with analysis of variance (P <.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine any association with mid-graft PSV. Results: Fasting postoperative duplex scans were reviewed from 43 mesenteric bypass grafts in 38 patients (28 superior mesenteric artery [SMA] alone, 3 celiac alone, 5 celiac and SMA, 2 SMA and renal). A total of 167 duplex exams were analyzed (mean of 4.5 studies per patient; range, 1 to 14). Inflow artery velocities were significantly lower in antegrade vs retrograde configurations (93 ± 73 cm/s vs 154 ± 73 cm/s, P <.05); however, proximal and mid-graft PSVs were not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, no effect was noted on mid-graft PSV when distal targets were compared (SMA vs celiac, 149 ± 42 cm/s vs 160 ± 78 cm/s, P = NS). An association between smaller graft diameter and higher mid-graft PSV was seen with univariate analysis (P = .03), with a trend toward significance with multivariate analysis (P = .06). In 18 bypass grafts where a follow-up examination was available >1 year (mean 38 ± 25 months) after the index postoperative exam, velocity did not significantly change over time. No duplex scan characteristics were predictive of graft thrombosis. Conclusion: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to fully characterize duplex-derived flow velocities in mesenteric artery bypass grafts. Although surveillance duplex scans after mesenteric bypass procedures may be affected by graft diameter, they are not significantly affected by the choice of inflow artery. These data can serve as standards for postoperative surveillance of mesenteric bypass grafts.

    AB - Background: Mesenteric bypass grafts may be followed postoperatively with duplex scanning. It is unknown, however, if duplex-derived velocity measurements vary over time or if the type of procedure (antegrade vs retrograde) and the caliber of graft affect velocity measurements. The purpose of this study was to characterize duplex findings in mesenteric bypass grafts with respect to the type of revascularization, graft caliber, and changes over time. This study also sought to identify duplex characteristics that could predict subsequent graft failure. Methods: Duplex examinations of mesenteric bypass grafts were reviewed. Peak systolic velocities (PSV) from the inflow artery, proximal anastomosis, mid graft, distal anastomosis, and outflow arteries were analyzed with respect to timing of the examination (index study vs follow-up exam), inflow source, distal target, and graft diameter. The results were compared with analysis of variance (P <.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine any association with mid-graft PSV. Results: Fasting postoperative duplex scans were reviewed from 43 mesenteric bypass grafts in 38 patients (28 superior mesenteric artery [SMA] alone, 3 celiac alone, 5 celiac and SMA, 2 SMA and renal). A total of 167 duplex exams were analyzed (mean of 4.5 studies per patient; range, 1 to 14). Inflow artery velocities were significantly lower in antegrade vs retrograde configurations (93 ± 73 cm/s vs 154 ± 73 cm/s, P <.05); however, proximal and mid-graft PSVs were not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, no effect was noted on mid-graft PSV when distal targets were compared (SMA vs celiac, 149 ± 42 cm/s vs 160 ± 78 cm/s, P = NS). An association between smaller graft diameter and higher mid-graft PSV was seen with univariate analysis (P = .03), with a trend toward significance with multivariate analysis (P = .06). In 18 bypass grafts where a follow-up examination was available >1 year (mean 38 ± 25 months) after the index postoperative exam, velocity did not significantly change over time. No duplex scan characteristics were predictive of graft thrombosis. Conclusion: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to fully characterize duplex-derived flow velocities in mesenteric artery bypass grafts. Although surveillance duplex scans after mesenteric bypass procedures may be affected by graft diameter, they are not significantly affected by the choice of inflow artery. These data can serve as standards for postoperative surveillance of mesenteric bypass grafts.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247327427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247327427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.020

    DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.020

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 17391903

    AN - SCOPUS:34247327427

    VL - 45

    SP - 922

    EP - 928

    JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

    JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

    SN - 0741-5214

    IS - 5

    ER -