TY - JOUR
T1 - Domain Experts on Dementia-Care Technologies
T2 - Mitigating Risk in Design and Implementation
AU - Berridge, Clara
AU - Demiris, George
AU - Kaye, Jeffrey
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [K01AG062681 to C.B., P30-AG008017, P30-AG024978, and U2C-AG0543701 to J.K.]
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - There is an urgent need to learn how to appropriately integrate technologies into dementia care. The aims of this Delphi study were to project which technologies will be most prevalent in dementia care in five years, articulate potential benefits and risks, and identify specific options to mitigate risks. Participants were also asked to identify technologies that are most likely to cause value tensions and thus most warrant a conversation with an older person with mild dementia when families are deciding about their use. Twenty-one interdisciplinary domain experts from academia and industry in aging and technology in the U.S. and Canada participated in a two-round online survey using the Delphi approach with an 84% response rate and no attrition between rounds. Rankings were analyzed using frequency counts and written-in responses were thematically analyzed. Twelve technology categories were identified along with a detailed list of risks and benefits for each. Suggestions to mitigate the most commonly raised risks are categorized as follows: intervene during design, make specific technical choices, build in choice and control, require data transparency, place restrictions on data use and ensure security, enable informed consent, and proactively educate users. This study provides information that is needed to navigate person-centered technology use in dementia care. The specific recommendations participants offered are relevant to designers, clinicians, researchers, ethicists, and policy makers and require proactive engagement from design through implementation.
AB - There is an urgent need to learn how to appropriately integrate technologies into dementia care. The aims of this Delphi study were to project which technologies will be most prevalent in dementia care in five years, articulate potential benefits and risks, and identify specific options to mitigate risks. Participants were also asked to identify technologies that are most likely to cause value tensions and thus most warrant a conversation with an older person with mild dementia when families are deciding about their use. Twenty-one interdisciplinary domain experts from academia and industry in aging and technology in the U.S. and Canada participated in a two-round online survey using the Delphi approach with an 84% response rate and no attrition between rounds. Rankings were analyzed using frequency counts and written-in responses were thematically analyzed. Twelve technology categories were identified along with a detailed list of risks and benefits for each. Suggestions to mitigate the most commonly raised risks are categorized as follows: intervene during design, make specific technical choices, build in choice and control, require data transparency, place restrictions on data use and ensure security, enable informed consent, and proactively educate users. This study provides information that is needed to navigate person-centered technology use in dementia care. The specific recommendations participants offered are relevant to designers, clinicians, researchers, ethicists, and policy makers and require proactive engagement from design through implementation.
KW - Alzheimer’s disease
KW - Decision making
KW - Dementia
KW - Ethics
KW - Long-term care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101206063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101206063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11948-021-00286-w
DO - 10.1007/s11948-021-00286-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 33599847
AN - SCOPUS:85101206063
SN - 1353-3452
VL - 27
JO - Science and Engineering Ethics
JF - Science and Engineering Ethics
IS - 1
M1 - 14
ER -