Does talking the talk matter? Effects of supervisor safety communication and safety climate on long-haul truckers’ safety performance

Yueng-hsiang Huang, Robert R. Sinclair, Jin Lee, Anna C. McFadden, Janelle H. Cheung, Lauren A. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the distinct contribution of supervisory safety communication and its interaction with safety climate in the prediction of safety performance and objective safety outcomes. Supervisory safety communication is defined as subordinates’ perceptions of the extent to which their supervisor provides them with relevant safety information about their job (i.e., top-down communication) and the extent to which they feel comfortable discussing safety issues with their supervisor (i.e., bottom-up communication). Survey data were collected from 5162 truck drivers from a U.S. trucking company with a 62.1% response rate. Individual employees’ survey responses were matched to their safety outcomes (i.e., lost-time injuries) six months after the survey data collection. Results showed that the quality of supervisor communication about safety uniquely contributes to safety outcomes, above and beyond measures of both group-level and organization-level safety climate. The construct validity of a newly-adapted safety communication scale was demonstrated, particularly focusing on its distinctiveness from safety climate and testing a model showing that communication had both main and moderating effects on safety behavior that ultimately predicted truck drivers’ injury rates. Our findings support the need for continued attention to supervisory safety communication as an important factor by itself, as well as a contingency factor influencing how safety climate relates to safety outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-367
Number of pages11
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume117
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Supervisory personnel
Climate
climate
Safety
communication
Communication
performance
driver
Truck drivers
construct validity
Wounds and Injuries
Motor Vehicles
contingency
employee
organization
interaction

Keywords

  • Long-haul truck drivers
  • Safety climate
  • Safety performance
  • Supervisor safety communication
  • Workplace injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Law

Cite this

Does talking the talk matter? Effects of supervisor safety communication and safety climate on long-haul truckers’ safety performance. / Huang, Yueng-hsiang; Sinclair, Robert R.; Lee, Jin; McFadden, Anna C.; Cheung, Janelle H.; Murphy, Lauren A.

In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 117, 01.08.2018, p. 357-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huang, Yueng-hsiang ; Sinclair, Robert R. ; Lee, Jin ; McFadden, Anna C. ; Cheung, Janelle H. ; Murphy, Lauren A. / Does talking the talk matter? Effects of supervisor safety communication and safety climate on long-haul truckers’ safety performance. In: Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2018 ; Vol. 117. pp. 357-367.
@article{0f34d34e20e44653a0623a8a717961af,
title = "Does talking the talk matter? Effects of supervisor safety communication and safety climate on long-haul truckers’ safety performance",
abstract = "This study examines the distinct contribution of supervisory safety communication and its interaction with safety climate in the prediction of safety performance and objective safety outcomes. Supervisory safety communication is defined as subordinates’ perceptions of the extent to which their supervisor provides them with relevant safety information about their job (i.e., top-down communication) and the extent to which they feel comfortable discussing safety issues with their supervisor (i.e., bottom-up communication). Survey data were collected from 5162 truck drivers from a U.S. trucking company with a 62.1{\%} response rate. Individual employees’ survey responses were matched to their safety outcomes (i.e., lost-time injuries) six months after the survey data collection. Results showed that the quality of supervisor communication about safety uniquely contributes to safety outcomes, above and beyond measures of both group-level and organization-level safety climate. The construct validity of a newly-adapted safety communication scale was demonstrated, particularly focusing on its distinctiveness from safety climate and testing a model showing that communication had both main and moderating effects on safety behavior that ultimately predicted truck drivers’ injury rates. Our findings support the need for continued attention to supervisory safety communication as an important factor by itself, as well as a contingency factor influencing how safety climate relates to safety outcomes.",
keywords = "Long-haul truck drivers, Safety climate, Safety performance, Supervisor safety communication, Workplace injury",
author = "Yueng-hsiang Huang and Sinclair, {Robert R.} and Jin Lee and McFadden, {Anna C.} and Cheung, {Janelle H.} and Murphy, {Lauren A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "357--367",
journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
issn = "0001-4575",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does talking the talk matter? Effects of supervisor safety communication and safety climate on long-haul truckers’ safety performance

AU - Huang, Yueng-hsiang

AU - Sinclair, Robert R.

AU - Lee, Jin

AU - McFadden, Anna C.

AU - Cheung, Janelle H.

AU - Murphy, Lauren A.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - This study examines the distinct contribution of supervisory safety communication and its interaction with safety climate in the prediction of safety performance and objective safety outcomes. Supervisory safety communication is defined as subordinates’ perceptions of the extent to which their supervisor provides them with relevant safety information about their job (i.e., top-down communication) and the extent to which they feel comfortable discussing safety issues with their supervisor (i.e., bottom-up communication). Survey data were collected from 5162 truck drivers from a U.S. trucking company with a 62.1% response rate. Individual employees’ survey responses were matched to their safety outcomes (i.e., lost-time injuries) six months after the survey data collection. Results showed that the quality of supervisor communication about safety uniquely contributes to safety outcomes, above and beyond measures of both group-level and organization-level safety climate. The construct validity of a newly-adapted safety communication scale was demonstrated, particularly focusing on its distinctiveness from safety climate and testing a model showing that communication had both main and moderating effects on safety behavior that ultimately predicted truck drivers’ injury rates. Our findings support the need for continued attention to supervisory safety communication as an important factor by itself, as well as a contingency factor influencing how safety climate relates to safety outcomes.

AB - This study examines the distinct contribution of supervisory safety communication and its interaction with safety climate in the prediction of safety performance and objective safety outcomes. Supervisory safety communication is defined as subordinates’ perceptions of the extent to which their supervisor provides them with relevant safety information about their job (i.e., top-down communication) and the extent to which they feel comfortable discussing safety issues with their supervisor (i.e., bottom-up communication). Survey data were collected from 5162 truck drivers from a U.S. trucking company with a 62.1% response rate. Individual employees’ survey responses were matched to their safety outcomes (i.e., lost-time injuries) six months after the survey data collection. Results showed that the quality of supervisor communication about safety uniquely contributes to safety outcomes, above and beyond measures of both group-level and organization-level safety climate. The construct validity of a newly-adapted safety communication scale was demonstrated, particularly focusing on its distinctiveness from safety climate and testing a model showing that communication had both main and moderating effects on safety behavior that ultimately predicted truck drivers’ injury rates. Our findings support the need for continued attention to supervisory safety communication as an important factor by itself, as well as a contingency factor influencing how safety climate relates to safety outcomes.

KW - Long-haul truck drivers

KW - Safety climate

KW - Safety performance

KW - Supervisor safety communication

KW - Workplace injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042667505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042667505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 29500055

AN - SCOPUS:85042667505

VL - 117

SP - 357

EP - 367

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

SN - 0001-4575

ER -