Does small for gestational age worsen outcomes in gestational diabetics?*

Tania F. Esakoff; Alyson Guillet; Aaron Caughey

doi:10.1080/14767058.2016.1193142

Does small for gestational age worsen outcomes in gestational diabetics?^*

Tania F. Esakoff, Alyson Guillet, Aaron Caughey

Obstetrics & Gynecology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Our goal was to determine whether pregnancy outcomes are worse in gestational diabetics with small for gestational age (SGA) than those without. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 114 199 pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in California, 6446 of which were complicated by SGA. SGA was defined as birth weight

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-4
Number of pages	4
Journal	Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1193142
State	Accepted/In press - Jun 7 2016

Keywords

Gestational diabetes
perinatal outcomes
small for gestational age

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Obstetrics and Gynecology

Access to Document

10.1080/14767058.2016.1193142

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does small for gestational age worsen outcomes in gestational diabetics?<sup>*</sup>'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Esakoff, T. F., Guillet, A., & Caughey, A. (Accepted/In press). Does small for gestational age worsen outcomes in gestational diabetics?^* Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1193142

@article{94e2e56eebe1455b9b23dad60ed82b7d,

title = "Does small for gestational age worsen outcomes in gestational diabetics?* ",

abstract = "Objective: Our goal was to determine whether pregnancy outcomes are worse in gestational diabetics with small for gestational age (SGA) than those without. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 114 199 pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in California, 6446 of which were complicated by SGA. SGA was defined as birth weight ",

keywords = "Gestational diabetes, perinatal outcomes, small for gestational age",

author = "Esakoff, {Tania F.} and Alyson Guillet and Aaron Caughey",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "7",

doi = "10.1080/14767058.2016.1193142",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "1--4",

journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",

issn = "1476-7058",

publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does small for gestational age worsen outcomes in gestational diabetics?*

AU - Esakoff, Tania F.

AU - Guillet, Alyson

AU - Caughey, Aaron

PY - 2016/6/7

Y1 - 2016/6/7

N2 - Objective: Our goal was to determine whether pregnancy outcomes are worse in gestational diabetics with small for gestational age (SGA) than those without. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 114 199 pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in California, 6446 of which were complicated by SGA. SGA was defined as birth weight

AB - Objective: Our goal was to determine whether pregnancy outcomes are worse in gestational diabetics with small for gestational age (SGA) than those without. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 114 199 pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in California, 6446 of which were complicated by SGA. SGA was defined as birth weight

KW - Gestational diabetes

KW - perinatal outcomes

KW - small for gestational age

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973621932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973621932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2016.1193142

DO - 10.1080/14767058.2016.1193142

M3 - Article

C2 - 27269646

AN - SCOPUS:84973621932

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

ER -