Does skin in the game matter if you aren't playing? Examining participation in Oregon's public employee health engagement model

Bill J. Wright, Kristen Dulacki, Jill Rissi, Leslie McBride, Sarah Tran, Natalie Royal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose. Employers are increasingly exploring health benefits that incentivize lifestyle change for employees. We used early data from an ongoing study of one such model - the Health Engagement Model (HEM), which Oregon implemented for all public employees in 2012 - to analyze variation in employee participation and engagement. Design. A survey was designed to assess program engagement, opinions of the program, and self-reported lifestyle changes. Setting. Data were collected in 2012, about 9 months after HEM launched. Subjects. A representative random sample of 4500 state employees served as the study subjects. Measures. Primary measures included whether employees signed up for the program, completed its required activities, and reported making lifestyle changes. Analysis. Logistic regression was used to analyze survey results. Results. Most employees (86%) chose to participate, but there were important socioeconomic differences: some key target populations, including smokers and obese employees, were the least likely to sign up; less educated employees were also less likely to complete program activities. Despite mostly negative opinions of the program, almost half of participants reported making lifestyle changes. Conclusion. Oregon's HEM launch was largely unpopular with employees, but many reported making the desired lifestyle changes. However, some of those the program is most interested in enrolling were the least likely to engage. People involved with implementing similar programs will need to think carefully about how to cultivate broad interest among employees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-34
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Health Promotion
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Occupational Health
Life Style
Public Health
employee
participation
health
Health
Health Services Needs and Demand
Insurance Benefits
Logistic Models
random sample
employer
logistics
regression
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • and weight control
  • geographic location
  • Health Behavior
  • Health focus: fitness/physical activity
  • Health Promotion
  • incentives
  • Lifestyle
  • nutrition
  • Occupational Health
  • Outcome measure: behavioral
  • Prevention Research. Manuscript format: research
  • Program Evaluation
  • race/ethnicity
  • Research purpose: intervention testing/program evaluation
  • Setting: workplace
  • skill building/behavior change
  • smoking control
  • Strategy: education
  • Study design: quasiexperimental
  • Target population age: adults
  • Target population circumstances: education/income level

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Does skin in the game matter if you aren't playing? Examining participation in Oregon's public employee health engagement model. / Wright, Bill J.; Dulacki, Kristen; Rissi, Jill; McBride, Leslie; Tran, Sarah; Royal, Natalie.

In: American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 28-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wright, Bill J. ; Dulacki, Kristen ; Rissi, Jill ; McBride, Leslie ; Tran, Sarah ; Royal, Natalie. / Does skin in the game matter if you aren't playing? Examining participation in Oregon's public employee health engagement model. In: American Journal of Health Promotion. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 28-34.
@article{5b562f3b562742a3b44b0461cc87f68c,
title = "Does skin in the game matter if you aren't playing? Examining participation in Oregon's public employee health engagement model",
abstract = "Purpose. Employers are increasingly exploring health benefits that incentivize lifestyle change for employees. We used early data from an ongoing study of one such model - the Health Engagement Model (HEM), which Oregon implemented for all public employees in 2012 - to analyze variation in employee participation and engagement. Design. A survey was designed to assess program engagement, opinions of the program, and self-reported lifestyle changes. Setting. Data were collected in 2012, about 9 months after HEM launched. Subjects. A representative random sample of 4500 state employees served as the study subjects. Measures. Primary measures included whether employees signed up for the program, completed its required activities, and reported making lifestyle changes. Analysis. Logistic regression was used to analyze survey results. Results. Most employees (86{\%}) chose to participate, but there were important socioeconomic differences: some key target populations, including smokers and obese employees, were the least likely to sign up; less educated employees were also less likely to complete program activities. Despite mostly negative opinions of the program, almost half of participants reported making lifestyle changes. Conclusion. Oregon's HEM launch was largely unpopular with employees, but many reported making the desired lifestyle changes. However, some of those the program is most interested in enrolling were the least likely to engage. People involved with implementing similar programs will need to think carefully about how to cultivate broad interest among employees.",
keywords = "and weight control, geographic location, Health Behavior, Health focus: fitness/physical activity, Health Promotion, incentives, Lifestyle, nutrition, Occupational Health, Outcome measure: behavioral, Prevention Research. Manuscript format: research, Program Evaluation, race/ethnicity, Research purpose: intervention testing/program evaluation, Setting: workplace, skill building/behavior change, smoking control, Strategy: education, Study design: quasiexperimental, Target population age: adults, Target population circumstances: education/income level",
author = "Wright, {Bill J.} and Kristen Dulacki and Jill Rissi and Leslie McBride and Sarah Tran and Natalie Royal",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4278/ajhp.150120-QUAN-678",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "28--34",
journal = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
issn = "0890-1171",
publisher = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does skin in the game matter if you aren't playing? Examining participation in Oregon's public employee health engagement model

AU - Wright, Bill J.

AU - Dulacki, Kristen

AU - Rissi, Jill

AU - McBride, Leslie

AU - Tran, Sarah

AU - Royal, Natalie

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose. Employers are increasingly exploring health benefits that incentivize lifestyle change for employees. We used early data from an ongoing study of one such model - the Health Engagement Model (HEM), which Oregon implemented for all public employees in 2012 - to analyze variation in employee participation and engagement. Design. A survey was designed to assess program engagement, opinions of the program, and self-reported lifestyle changes. Setting. Data were collected in 2012, about 9 months after HEM launched. Subjects. A representative random sample of 4500 state employees served as the study subjects. Measures. Primary measures included whether employees signed up for the program, completed its required activities, and reported making lifestyle changes. Analysis. Logistic regression was used to analyze survey results. Results. Most employees (86%) chose to participate, but there were important socioeconomic differences: some key target populations, including smokers and obese employees, were the least likely to sign up; less educated employees were also less likely to complete program activities. Despite mostly negative opinions of the program, almost half of participants reported making lifestyle changes. Conclusion. Oregon's HEM launch was largely unpopular with employees, but many reported making the desired lifestyle changes. However, some of those the program is most interested in enrolling were the least likely to engage. People involved with implementing similar programs will need to think carefully about how to cultivate broad interest among employees.

AB - Purpose. Employers are increasingly exploring health benefits that incentivize lifestyle change for employees. We used early data from an ongoing study of one such model - the Health Engagement Model (HEM), which Oregon implemented for all public employees in 2012 - to analyze variation in employee participation and engagement. Design. A survey was designed to assess program engagement, opinions of the program, and self-reported lifestyle changes. Setting. Data were collected in 2012, about 9 months after HEM launched. Subjects. A representative random sample of 4500 state employees served as the study subjects. Measures. Primary measures included whether employees signed up for the program, completed its required activities, and reported making lifestyle changes. Analysis. Logistic regression was used to analyze survey results. Results. Most employees (86%) chose to participate, but there were important socioeconomic differences: some key target populations, including smokers and obese employees, were the least likely to sign up; less educated employees were also less likely to complete program activities. Despite mostly negative opinions of the program, almost half of participants reported making lifestyle changes. Conclusion. Oregon's HEM launch was largely unpopular with employees, but many reported making the desired lifestyle changes. However, some of those the program is most interested in enrolling were the least likely to engage. People involved with implementing similar programs will need to think carefully about how to cultivate broad interest among employees.

KW - and weight control

KW - geographic location

KW - Health Behavior

KW - Health focus: fitness/physical activity

KW - Health Promotion

KW - incentives

KW - Lifestyle

KW - nutrition

KW - Occupational Health

KW - Outcome measure: behavioral

KW - Prevention Research. Manuscript format: research

KW - Program Evaluation

KW - race/ethnicity

KW - Research purpose: intervention testing/program evaluation

KW - Setting: workplace

KW - skill building/behavior change

KW - smoking control

KW - Strategy: education

KW - Study design: quasiexperimental

KW - Target population age: adults

KW - Target population circumstances: education/income level

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006981316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006981316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4278/ajhp.150120-QUAN-678

DO - 10.4278/ajhp.150120-QUAN-678

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 28

EP - 34

JO - American Journal of Health Promotion

JF - American Journal of Health Promotion

SN - 0890-1171

IS - 1

ER -