Does loss of consciousness predict neuropsychological decrements after concussion?

Mark R. Lovell, Grant L. Iverson, Michael W. Collins, Douglas McKeag, Joseph C. Maroon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

178 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the importance of loss of consciousness (LOC) in predicting neuropsychological test performance in a large sample of patients with head injury. Design: Retrospective comparison of neuropsychological test results for patients who suffered traumatic LOC, no LOC, or uncertain LOC. Setting: Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Patients: The total number of patients included in this study was 383. Main Outcome Measures: Neuropsychological test measures, including the visual reproduction, digit span, and logical memory subtests of the Wechsler memory scale (revised), the Trail Making test, Wisconsin Card Sorting test, Hopkins Verbal Learning test, Controlled Oral Word Association, and the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia test (GOAT). Results: No significant differences were found between the LOC, no LOC, or uncertain LOC groups for any of the neuropsychological measures used. Patients who had experienced traumatic LOC did not perform more poorly on neuropsychological testing than those with no LOC or uncertain LOC. All three groups demonstrated mildly decreased performance on formal tests of speed of information processing, attentional process, and memory. Conclusion: The results of this study cast doubt on the importance of LOC as a predictor of neuropsychological test performance during the acute phase of recovery from mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological testing procedures have been shown to be sensitive in measuring cognitive sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury (concussion) in athletes. The failure of this study to find any relationship between LOC and neuropsychological functioning in a large sample of patients with mild head trauma calls into question the assignment of primary importance to LOC in grading severity of concussion. This study also does not provide support for the use of guidelines that rely heavily on LOC in making return-to-play decisions. Continued research is necessary to determine the relative importance of markers of concussion in athletes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-198
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Unconsciousness
Neuropsychological Tests
Brain Concussion
Craniocerebral Trauma
Athletes
Trail Making Test
Wechsler Scales
Verbal Learning
Amnesia
Automatic Data Processing
General Hospitals
Reproduction

Keywords

  • Brain, wounds and injuries
  • Concussion
  • Trauma
  • Trauma, psychological effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Does loss of consciousness predict neuropsychological decrements after concussion? / Lovell, Mark R.; Iverson, Grant L.; Collins, Michael W.; McKeag, Douglas; Maroon, Joseph C.

In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.01.1999, p. 193-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lovell, Mark R. ; Iverson, Grant L. ; Collins, Michael W. ; McKeag, Douglas ; Maroon, Joseph C. / Does loss of consciousness predict neuropsychological decrements after concussion?. In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 193-198.
@article{b2ede1a59b964c9ab9b9fab8320a9139,
title = "Does loss of consciousness predict neuropsychological decrements after concussion?",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the importance of loss of consciousness (LOC) in predicting neuropsychological test performance in a large sample of patients with head injury. Design: Retrospective comparison of neuropsychological test results for patients who suffered traumatic LOC, no LOC, or uncertain LOC. Setting: Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Patients: The total number of patients included in this study was 383. Main Outcome Measures: Neuropsychological test measures, including the visual reproduction, digit span, and logical memory subtests of the Wechsler memory scale (revised), the Trail Making test, Wisconsin Card Sorting test, Hopkins Verbal Learning test, Controlled Oral Word Association, and the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia test (GOAT). Results: No significant differences were found between the LOC, no LOC, or uncertain LOC groups for any of the neuropsychological measures used. Patients who had experienced traumatic LOC did not perform more poorly on neuropsychological testing than those with no LOC or uncertain LOC. All three groups demonstrated mildly decreased performance on formal tests of speed of information processing, attentional process, and memory. Conclusion: The results of this study cast doubt on the importance of LOC as a predictor of neuropsychological test performance during the acute phase of recovery from mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological testing procedures have been shown to be sensitive in measuring cognitive sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury (concussion) in athletes. The failure of this study to find any relationship between LOC and neuropsychological functioning in a large sample of patients with mild head trauma calls into question the assignment of primary importance to LOC in grading severity of concussion. This study also does not provide support for the use of guidelines that rely heavily on LOC in making return-to-play decisions. Continued research is necessary to determine the relative importance of markers of concussion in athletes.",
keywords = "Brain, wounds and injuries, Concussion, Trauma, Trauma, psychological effects",
author = "Lovell, {Mark R.} and Iverson, {Grant L.} and Collins, {Michael W.} and Douglas McKeag and Maroon, {Joseph C.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00042752-199910000-00002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "193--198",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine",
issn = "1050-642X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does loss of consciousness predict neuropsychological decrements after concussion?

AU - Lovell, Mark R.

AU - Iverson, Grant L.

AU - Collins, Michael W.

AU - McKeag, Douglas

AU - Maroon, Joseph C.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Objective: To investigate the importance of loss of consciousness (LOC) in predicting neuropsychological test performance in a large sample of patients with head injury. Design: Retrospective comparison of neuropsychological test results for patients who suffered traumatic LOC, no LOC, or uncertain LOC. Setting: Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Patients: The total number of patients included in this study was 383. Main Outcome Measures: Neuropsychological test measures, including the visual reproduction, digit span, and logical memory subtests of the Wechsler memory scale (revised), the Trail Making test, Wisconsin Card Sorting test, Hopkins Verbal Learning test, Controlled Oral Word Association, and the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia test (GOAT). Results: No significant differences were found between the LOC, no LOC, or uncertain LOC groups for any of the neuropsychological measures used. Patients who had experienced traumatic LOC did not perform more poorly on neuropsychological testing than those with no LOC or uncertain LOC. All three groups demonstrated mildly decreased performance on formal tests of speed of information processing, attentional process, and memory. Conclusion: The results of this study cast doubt on the importance of LOC as a predictor of neuropsychological test performance during the acute phase of recovery from mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological testing procedures have been shown to be sensitive in measuring cognitive sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury (concussion) in athletes. The failure of this study to find any relationship between LOC and neuropsychological functioning in a large sample of patients with mild head trauma calls into question the assignment of primary importance to LOC in grading severity of concussion. This study also does not provide support for the use of guidelines that rely heavily on LOC in making return-to-play decisions. Continued research is necessary to determine the relative importance of markers of concussion in athletes.

AB - Objective: To investigate the importance of loss of consciousness (LOC) in predicting neuropsychological test performance in a large sample of patients with head injury. Design: Retrospective comparison of neuropsychological test results for patients who suffered traumatic LOC, no LOC, or uncertain LOC. Setting: Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Patients: The total number of patients included in this study was 383. Main Outcome Measures: Neuropsychological test measures, including the visual reproduction, digit span, and logical memory subtests of the Wechsler memory scale (revised), the Trail Making test, Wisconsin Card Sorting test, Hopkins Verbal Learning test, Controlled Oral Word Association, and the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia test (GOAT). Results: No significant differences were found between the LOC, no LOC, or uncertain LOC groups for any of the neuropsychological measures used. Patients who had experienced traumatic LOC did not perform more poorly on neuropsychological testing than those with no LOC or uncertain LOC. All three groups demonstrated mildly decreased performance on formal tests of speed of information processing, attentional process, and memory. Conclusion: The results of this study cast doubt on the importance of LOC as a predictor of neuropsychological test performance during the acute phase of recovery from mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological testing procedures have been shown to be sensitive in measuring cognitive sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury (concussion) in athletes. The failure of this study to find any relationship between LOC and neuropsychological functioning in a large sample of patients with mild head trauma calls into question the assignment of primary importance to LOC in grading severity of concussion. This study also does not provide support for the use of guidelines that rely heavily on LOC in making return-to-play decisions. Continued research is necessary to determine the relative importance of markers of concussion in athletes.

KW - Brain, wounds and injuries

KW - Concussion

KW - Trauma

KW - Trauma, psychological effects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033211244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033211244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00042752-199910000-00002

DO - 10.1097/00042752-199910000-00002

M3 - Article

C2 - 10593212

AN - SCOPUS:0033211244

VL - 9

SP - 193

EP - 198

JO - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

JF - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

SN - 1050-642X

IS - 4

ER -