Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography

Joann G. Elmore, Stephen H. Taplin, William E. Barlow, Gary R. Cutter, Carl J. D'Orsi, R. Edward Hendrick, Linn A. Abraham, Jessica S. Fosse, Patricia (Patty) Carney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between radiologists' perception of and experience with medical malpractice and their patient-recall rates in actual community-based clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All study activities were approved by the institutional review boards of the involved institutions, and patient and radiologist informed consent was obtained where necessary. This study was performed in three regions of the United States (Washington, Colorado, and New Hampshire). Radiologists who routinely interpret mammograms completed a mailed survey that included questions on demographic data, practice environment, and medical malpractice. Survey responses were linked to interpretive performance for all screening mammography examinations performed between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2001. The odds of recall were modeled by using logistic regression analysis based on generalized estimating equations that adjust for study region. RESULTS: Of 181 eligible radiologists, 139 (76.8%) returned the survey with full consent. The analysis included 124 radiologists who had interpreted a total of 557 143 screening mammograms. Approximately half (64 of 122 [52.4%]) of the radiologists reported a prior malpractice claim, with 18 (14.8%) reporting mammography-related claims. The majority (n = 51 [81.0%]) of the 63 radiologists who responded to a question regarding the degree of stress caused by a medical malpractice claim described the experience as very or extremely stressful. More than three of every four radiologists (ie, 94 [76.4%] of 123) expressed concern about the impact medical malpractice has on mammography practice, with over half (72 [58.5%] of 123) indicating that their concern moderately to greatly increased the number of their recommendations for breast biopsies. Radiologists' estimates of their future malpractice risk were substantially higher than the actual historical risk. Almost one of every three radiologists (43 of 122 [35.3%]) had considered withdrawing from mammogram interpretation because of malpractice concerns. No significant association was found between recall rates and radiologists' experiences or perceptions of medical malpractice. CONCLUSION: U.S. radiologists are extremely concerned about medical malpractice and report that this concern affects their recall rates and biopsy recommendations. However, medical malpractice experience and concerns were not associated with recall or false-positive rates. Heightened concern of almost all radiologists may be a key reason that recall rates are higher in the United States than in other countries, but this hypothesis requires further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-46
Number of pages10
JournalRadiology
Volume236
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Jurisprudence
Mammography
Radiologists
Biopsy
Research Ethics Committees
Informed Consent
Breast
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography. / Elmore, Joann G.; Taplin, Stephen H.; Barlow, William E.; Cutter, Gary R.; D'Orsi, Carl J.; Hendrick, R. Edward; Abraham, Linn A.; Fosse, Jessica S.; Carney, Patricia (Patty).

In: Radiology, Vol. 236, No. 1, 07.2005, p. 37-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Elmore, Joann G. ; Taplin, Stephen H. ; Barlow, William E. ; Cutter, Gary R. ; D'Orsi, Carl J. ; Hendrick, R. Edward ; Abraham, Linn A. ; Fosse, Jessica S. ; Carney, Patricia (Patty). / Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography. In: Radiology. 2005 ; Vol. 236, No. 1. pp. 37-46.
@article{577802dcf1b74a6594130a0b1588d0d9,
title = "Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between radiologists' perception of and experience with medical malpractice and their patient-recall rates in actual community-based clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All study activities were approved by the institutional review boards of the involved institutions, and patient and radiologist informed consent was obtained where necessary. This study was performed in three regions of the United States (Washington, Colorado, and New Hampshire). Radiologists who routinely interpret mammograms completed a mailed survey that included questions on demographic data, practice environment, and medical malpractice. Survey responses were linked to interpretive performance for all screening mammography examinations performed between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2001. The odds of recall were modeled by using logistic regression analysis based on generalized estimating equations that adjust for study region. RESULTS: Of 181 eligible radiologists, 139 (76.8{\%}) returned the survey with full consent. The analysis included 124 radiologists who had interpreted a total of 557 143 screening mammograms. Approximately half (64 of 122 [52.4{\%}]) of the radiologists reported a prior malpractice claim, with 18 (14.8{\%}) reporting mammography-related claims. The majority (n = 51 [81.0{\%}]) of the 63 radiologists who responded to a question regarding the degree of stress caused by a medical malpractice claim described the experience as very or extremely stressful. More than three of every four radiologists (ie, 94 [76.4{\%}] of 123) expressed concern about the impact medical malpractice has on mammography practice, with over half (72 [58.5{\%}] of 123) indicating that their concern moderately to greatly increased the number of their recommendations for breast biopsies. Radiologists' estimates of their future malpractice risk were substantially higher than the actual historical risk. Almost one of every three radiologists (43 of 122 [35.3{\%}]) had considered withdrawing from mammogram interpretation because of malpractice concerns. No significant association was found between recall rates and radiologists' experiences or perceptions of medical malpractice. CONCLUSION: U.S. radiologists are extremely concerned about medical malpractice and report that this concern affects their recall rates and biopsy recommendations. However, medical malpractice experience and concerns were not associated with recall or false-positive rates. Heightened concern of almost all radiologists may be a key reason that recall rates are higher in the United States than in other countries, but this hypothesis requires further study.",
author = "Elmore, {Joann G.} and Taplin, {Stephen H.} and Barlow, {William E.} and Cutter, {Gary R.} and D'Orsi, {Carl J.} and Hendrick, {R. Edward} and Abraham, {Linn A.} and Fosse, {Jessica S.} and Carney, {Patricia (Patty)}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.2361040512",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "236",
pages = "37--46",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography

AU - Elmore, Joann G.

AU - Taplin, Stephen H.

AU - Barlow, William E.

AU - Cutter, Gary R.

AU - D'Orsi, Carl J.

AU - Hendrick, R. Edward

AU - Abraham, Linn A.

AU - Fosse, Jessica S.

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between radiologists' perception of and experience with medical malpractice and their patient-recall rates in actual community-based clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All study activities were approved by the institutional review boards of the involved institutions, and patient and radiologist informed consent was obtained where necessary. This study was performed in three regions of the United States (Washington, Colorado, and New Hampshire). Radiologists who routinely interpret mammograms completed a mailed survey that included questions on demographic data, practice environment, and medical malpractice. Survey responses were linked to interpretive performance for all screening mammography examinations performed between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2001. The odds of recall were modeled by using logistic regression analysis based on generalized estimating equations that adjust for study region. RESULTS: Of 181 eligible radiologists, 139 (76.8%) returned the survey with full consent. The analysis included 124 radiologists who had interpreted a total of 557 143 screening mammograms. Approximately half (64 of 122 [52.4%]) of the radiologists reported a prior malpractice claim, with 18 (14.8%) reporting mammography-related claims. The majority (n = 51 [81.0%]) of the 63 radiologists who responded to a question regarding the degree of stress caused by a medical malpractice claim described the experience as very or extremely stressful. More than three of every four radiologists (ie, 94 [76.4%] of 123) expressed concern about the impact medical malpractice has on mammography practice, with over half (72 [58.5%] of 123) indicating that their concern moderately to greatly increased the number of their recommendations for breast biopsies. Radiologists' estimates of their future malpractice risk were substantially higher than the actual historical risk. Almost one of every three radiologists (43 of 122 [35.3%]) had considered withdrawing from mammogram interpretation because of malpractice concerns. No significant association was found between recall rates and radiologists' experiences or perceptions of medical malpractice. CONCLUSION: U.S. radiologists are extremely concerned about medical malpractice and report that this concern affects their recall rates and biopsy recommendations. However, medical malpractice experience and concerns were not associated with recall or false-positive rates. Heightened concern of almost all radiologists may be a key reason that recall rates are higher in the United States than in other countries, but this hypothesis requires further study.

AB - PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between radiologists' perception of and experience with medical malpractice and their patient-recall rates in actual community-based clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All study activities were approved by the institutional review boards of the involved institutions, and patient and radiologist informed consent was obtained where necessary. This study was performed in three regions of the United States (Washington, Colorado, and New Hampshire). Radiologists who routinely interpret mammograms completed a mailed survey that included questions on demographic data, practice environment, and medical malpractice. Survey responses were linked to interpretive performance for all screening mammography examinations performed between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2001. The odds of recall were modeled by using logistic regression analysis based on generalized estimating equations that adjust for study region. RESULTS: Of 181 eligible radiologists, 139 (76.8%) returned the survey with full consent. The analysis included 124 radiologists who had interpreted a total of 557 143 screening mammograms. Approximately half (64 of 122 [52.4%]) of the radiologists reported a prior malpractice claim, with 18 (14.8%) reporting mammography-related claims. The majority (n = 51 [81.0%]) of the 63 radiologists who responded to a question regarding the degree of stress caused by a medical malpractice claim described the experience as very or extremely stressful. More than three of every four radiologists (ie, 94 [76.4%] of 123) expressed concern about the impact medical malpractice has on mammography practice, with over half (72 [58.5%] of 123) indicating that their concern moderately to greatly increased the number of their recommendations for breast biopsies. Radiologists' estimates of their future malpractice risk were substantially higher than the actual historical risk. Almost one of every three radiologists (43 of 122 [35.3%]) had considered withdrawing from mammogram interpretation because of malpractice concerns. No significant association was found between recall rates and radiologists' experiences or perceptions of medical malpractice. CONCLUSION: U.S. radiologists are extremely concerned about medical malpractice and report that this concern affects their recall rates and biopsy recommendations. However, medical malpractice experience and concerns were not associated with recall or false-positive rates. Heightened concern of almost all radiologists may be a key reason that recall rates are higher in the United States than in other countries, but this hypothesis requires further study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20744454137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20744454137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2361040512

DO - 10.1148/radiol.2361040512

M3 - Article

C2 - 15987961

AN - SCOPUS:20744454137

VL - 236

SP - 37

EP - 46

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -