Diversity by race, hispanic ethnicity, and sex of the united states medical oncology physician workforce over the past quarter century

Curtiland Deville, Christina H. Chapman, Ramon Burgos, Wei Ting Hwang, Stefan Both, Charles Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the medical oncology (MO) physician workforce diversity by race, Hispanic ethnicity, and sex, with attention to trainees. Methods: Public registries were used to assess 2010 differences among MO practicing physicians, academic faculty, and fellows; internal medicine (IM) residents; and the US population, using binomial tests with P <.001 significance adjusting for multiple comparisons. Significant changes in fellow representation from 1986 to 2011 were assessed. Results: Female representation as MO fellows (45.0%) was significantly increased compared with faculty (22.4%) and practicing physicians (27.4%); was no different than IM residents (44.7%, P = .853); and increased significantly, by 1.0% per year. Women were significantly underrepresented as practicing physicians, faculty, and fellows compared with the US population (50.8%). Traditionally underrepresented minorities in medicine (URM) were significantly underrepresented as practicing physicians (7.8%), faculty (5.7%), and fellows (10.9%), versus US population (30.0%). Hispanic MO fellows (7.5%) were increased compared with faculty (3.9%) and practicing physicians (4.1%); Black fellows (3.1%) were no different than faculty (1.8%, P = .0283) or practicing physicians (3.5%, P = .443). When comparing MO fellows versus IM residents, there were no differences for American Indians/Alaska Natives/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (0.3%, 0.6%, respectively, P = .137) and Hispanics (7.5%, 8.7%, P = .139), unlike Blacks (3.1%, 5.6%, P <.001). There has been no significant change in URM representation, with negligible changes every 5 years for American Indians/Alaska Natives/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (-0.1%), Blacks (-0.3%), and Hispanics (0.3%). Conclusions: Female fellow representation increased 1% per year over the quarter century indicating historical gains, whereas URM diversity remains unchanged. For Blacks alone, representation as MO fellows is decreased compared with IM residents, suggesting greater disparity in MO training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e328-e334
JournalJournal of Oncology Practice
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

Medical Oncology
Hispanic Americans
Physicians
Internal Medicine
Oceanic Ancestry Group
North American Indians
Medicine
Population
Registries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Diversity by race, hispanic ethnicity, and sex of the united states medical oncology physician workforce over the past quarter century. / Deville, Curtiland; Chapman, Christina H.; Burgos, Ramon; Hwang, Wei Ting; Both, Stefan; Thomas, Charles.

In: Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 10, No. 5, 01.09.2014, p. e328-e334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deville, Curtiland ; Chapman, Christina H. ; Burgos, Ramon ; Hwang, Wei Ting ; Both, Stefan ; Thomas, Charles. / Diversity by race, hispanic ethnicity, and sex of the united states medical oncology physician workforce over the past quarter century. In: Journal of Oncology Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 5. pp. e328-e334.
@article{8960dfbc186145a6818dd61b2a5efd9d,
title = "Diversity by race, hispanic ethnicity, and sex of the united states medical oncology physician workforce over the past quarter century",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the medical oncology (MO) physician workforce diversity by race, Hispanic ethnicity, and sex, with attention to trainees. Methods: Public registries were used to assess 2010 differences among MO practicing physicians, academic faculty, and fellows; internal medicine (IM) residents; and the US population, using binomial tests with P <.001 significance adjusting for multiple comparisons. Significant changes in fellow representation from 1986 to 2011 were assessed. Results: Female representation as MO fellows (45.0{\%}) was significantly increased compared with faculty (22.4{\%}) and practicing physicians (27.4{\%}); was no different than IM residents (44.7{\%}, P = .853); and increased significantly, by 1.0{\%} per year. Women were significantly underrepresented as practicing physicians, faculty, and fellows compared with the US population (50.8{\%}). Traditionally underrepresented minorities in medicine (URM) were significantly underrepresented as practicing physicians (7.8{\%}), faculty (5.7{\%}), and fellows (10.9{\%}), versus US population (30.0{\%}). Hispanic MO fellows (7.5{\%}) were increased compared with faculty (3.9{\%}) and practicing physicians (4.1{\%}); Black fellows (3.1{\%}) were no different than faculty (1.8{\%}, P = .0283) or practicing physicians (3.5{\%}, P = .443). When comparing MO fellows versus IM residents, there were no differences for American Indians/Alaska Natives/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (0.3{\%}, 0.6{\%}, respectively, P = .137) and Hispanics (7.5{\%}, 8.7{\%}, P = .139), unlike Blacks (3.1{\%}, 5.6{\%}, P <.001). There has been no significant change in URM representation, with negligible changes every 5 years for American Indians/Alaska Natives/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (-0.1{\%}), Blacks (-0.3{\%}), and Hispanics (0.3{\%}). Conclusions: Female fellow representation increased 1{\%} per year over the quarter century indicating historical gains, whereas URM diversity remains unchanged. For Blacks alone, representation as MO fellows is decreased compared with IM residents, suggesting greater disparity in MO training.",
author = "Curtiland Deville and Chapman, {Christina H.} and Ramon Burgos and Hwang, {Wei Ting} and Stefan Both and Charles Thomas",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1200/JOP.2014.001464",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "e328--e334",
journal = "Journal of Oncology Practice",
issn = "1554-7477",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversity by race, hispanic ethnicity, and sex of the united states medical oncology physician workforce over the past quarter century

AU - Deville, Curtiland

AU - Chapman, Christina H.

AU - Burgos, Ramon

AU - Hwang, Wei Ting

AU - Both, Stefan

AU - Thomas, Charles

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the medical oncology (MO) physician workforce diversity by race, Hispanic ethnicity, and sex, with attention to trainees. Methods: Public registries were used to assess 2010 differences among MO practicing physicians, academic faculty, and fellows; internal medicine (IM) residents; and the US population, using binomial tests with P <.001 significance adjusting for multiple comparisons. Significant changes in fellow representation from 1986 to 2011 were assessed. Results: Female representation as MO fellows (45.0%) was significantly increased compared with faculty (22.4%) and practicing physicians (27.4%); was no different than IM residents (44.7%, P = .853); and increased significantly, by 1.0% per year. Women were significantly underrepresented as practicing physicians, faculty, and fellows compared with the US population (50.8%). Traditionally underrepresented minorities in medicine (URM) were significantly underrepresented as practicing physicians (7.8%), faculty (5.7%), and fellows (10.9%), versus US population (30.0%). Hispanic MO fellows (7.5%) were increased compared with faculty (3.9%) and practicing physicians (4.1%); Black fellows (3.1%) were no different than faculty (1.8%, P = .0283) or practicing physicians (3.5%, P = .443). When comparing MO fellows versus IM residents, there were no differences for American Indians/Alaska Natives/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (0.3%, 0.6%, respectively, P = .137) and Hispanics (7.5%, 8.7%, P = .139), unlike Blacks (3.1%, 5.6%, P <.001). There has been no significant change in URM representation, with negligible changes every 5 years for American Indians/Alaska Natives/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (-0.1%), Blacks (-0.3%), and Hispanics (0.3%). Conclusions: Female fellow representation increased 1% per year over the quarter century indicating historical gains, whereas URM diversity remains unchanged. For Blacks alone, representation as MO fellows is decreased compared with IM residents, suggesting greater disparity in MO training.

AB - Purpose: To assess the medical oncology (MO) physician workforce diversity by race, Hispanic ethnicity, and sex, with attention to trainees. Methods: Public registries were used to assess 2010 differences among MO practicing physicians, academic faculty, and fellows; internal medicine (IM) residents; and the US population, using binomial tests with P <.001 significance adjusting for multiple comparisons. Significant changes in fellow representation from 1986 to 2011 were assessed. Results: Female representation as MO fellows (45.0%) was significantly increased compared with faculty (22.4%) and practicing physicians (27.4%); was no different than IM residents (44.7%, P = .853); and increased significantly, by 1.0% per year. Women were significantly underrepresented as practicing physicians, faculty, and fellows compared with the US population (50.8%). Traditionally underrepresented minorities in medicine (URM) were significantly underrepresented as practicing physicians (7.8%), faculty (5.7%), and fellows (10.9%), versus US population (30.0%). Hispanic MO fellows (7.5%) were increased compared with faculty (3.9%) and practicing physicians (4.1%); Black fellows (3.1%) were no different than faculty (1.8%, P = .0283) or practicing physicians (3.5%, P = .443). When comparing MO fellows versus IM residents, there were no differences for American Indians/Alaska Natives/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (0.3%, 0.6%, respectively, P = .137) and Hispanics (7.5%, 8.7%, P = .139), unlike Blacks (3.1%, 5.6%, P <.001). There has been no significant change in URM representation, with negligible changes every 5 years for American Indians/Alaska Natives/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (-0.1%), Blacks (-0.3%), and Hispanics (0.3%). Conclusions: Female fellow representation increased 1% per year over the quarter century indicating historical gains, whereas URM diversity remains unchanged. For Blacks alone, representation as MO fellows is decreased compared with IM residents, suggesting greater disparity in MO training.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911949088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911949088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JOP.2014.001464

DO - 10.1200/JOP.2014.001464

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - e328-e334

JO - Journal of Oncology Practice

JF - Journal of Oncology Practice

SN - 1554-7477

IS - 5

ER -