Disparities in access to physicians and medications for the treatment of substance use disorders between publicly and privately funded treatment programs in the united states

Amanda J. Abraham, Hannah K. Knudsen, Traci Rieckmann, Paul M. Roman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Prior research suggests that publicly funded substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs lag behind privately funded programs in adoption of evidence-based practices, resulting in disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment. These disparities highlight a critical public health concern because the majority of SUD patients in the United States are treated in the publicly funded treatment sector. This study uses recent data to examine disparities in access to physicians and availability of medications for the treatment of SUDs between publicly and privately funded SUD treatment programs. Method: Data were collected from 595 specialty SUD treatment programs from 2007 to 2010 via face-to-face interviews, mailed surveys, and telephone interviews with treatment program administrators. Results: Publicly funded programs were less likely than privately funded programs to have a physician on staff, even after controlling for several organizational characteristics that were associated with access to physicians. The results of negative binomial regression indicated that, even after taking into account physician access and other organizational variables, publicly funded programs prescribed fewer SUD medications than privately funded SUD treatment programs. Conclusions: Patients seeking treatment in publicly funded treatment programs continue to face disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment that supports patients' choices among a range of medication options. However, implementation of the Affordable Care Act may facilitate greater access to physicians and use of medications in publicly funded SUD treatment programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)258-265
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Volume74
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Patient treatment
Public health
Telephone
Substance-Related Disorders
medication
physician
Availability
Physicians
Therapeutics
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Interviews
telephone interview
Evidence-Based Practice
Administrative Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Disparities in access to physicians and medications for the treatment of substance use disorders between publicly and privately funded treatment programs in the united states. / Abraham, Amanda J.; Knudsen, Hannah K.; Rieckmann, Traci; Roman, Paul M.

In: Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Vol. 74, No. 2, 2013, p. 258-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{970f7c374a6c43edb1448217f82e1ba1,
title = "Disparities in access to physicians and medications for the treatment of substance use disorders between publicly and privately funded treatment programs in the united states",
abstract = "Objective: Prior research suggests that publicly funded substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs lag behind privately funded programs in adoption of evidence-based practices, resulting in disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment. These disparities highlight a critical public health concern because the majority of SUD patients in the United States are treated in the publicly funded treatment sector. This study uses recent data to examine disparities in access to physicians and availability of medications for the treatment of SUDs between publicly and privately funded SUD treatment programs. Method: Data were collected from 595 specialty SUD treatment programs from 2007 to 2010 via face-to-face interviews, mailed surveys, and telephone interviews with treatment program administrators. Results: Publicly funded programs were less likely than privately funded programs to have a physician on staff, even after controlling for several organizational characteristics that were associated with access to physicians. The results of negative binomial regression indicated that, even after taking into account physician access and other organizational variables, publicly funded programs prescribed fewer SUD medications than privately funded SUD treatment programs. Conclusions: Patients seeking treatment in publicly funded treatment programs continue to face disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment that supports patients' choices among a range of medication options. However, implementation of the Affordable Care Act may facilitate greater access to physicians and use of medications in publicly funded SUD treatment programs.",
author = "Abraham, {Amanda J.} and Knudsen, {Hannah K.} and Traci Rieckmann and Roman, {Paul M.}",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "258--265",
journal = "Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs",
issn = "1937-1888",
publisher = "Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disparities in access to physicians and medications for the treatment of substance use disorders between publicly and privately funded treatment programs in the united states

AU - Abraham, Amanda J.

AU - Knudsen, Hannah K.

AU - Rieckmann, Traci

AU - Roman, Paul M.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Objective: Prior research suggests that publicly funded substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs lag behind privately funded programs in adoption of evidence-based practices, resulting in disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment. These disparities highlight a critical public health concern because the majority of SUD patients in the United States are treated in the publicly funded treatment sector. This study uses recent data to examine disparities in access to physicians and availability of medications for the treatment of SUDs between publicly and privately funded SUD treatment programs. Method: Data were collected from 595 specialty SUD treatment programs from 2007 to 2010 via face-to-face interviews, mailed surveys, and telephone interviews with treatment program administrators. Results: Publicly funded programs were less likely than privately funded programs to have a physician on staff, even after controlling for several organizational characteristics that were associated with access to physicians. The results of negative binomial regression indicated that, even after taking into account physician access and other organizational variables, publicly funded programs prescribed fewer SUD medications than privately funded SUD treatment programs. Conclusions: Patients seeking treatment in publicly funded treatment programs continue to face disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment that supports patients' choices among a range of medication options. However, implementation of the Affordable Care Act may facilitate greater access to physicians and use of medications in publicly funded SUD treatment programs.

AB - Objective: Prior research suggests that publicly funded substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs lag behind privately funded programs in adoption of evidence-based practices, resulting in disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment. These disparities highlight a critical public health concern because the majority of SUD patients in the United States are treated in the publicly funded treatment sector. This study uses recent data to examine disparities in access to physicians and availability of medications for the treatment of SUDs between publicly and privately funded SUD treatment programs. Method: Data were collected from 595 specialty SUD treatment programs from 2007 to 2010 via face-to-face interviews, mailed surveys, and telephone interviews with treatment program administrators. Results: Publicly funded programs were less likely than privately funded programs to have a physician on staff, even after controlling for several organizational characteristics that were associated with access to physicians. The results of negative binomial regression indicated that, even after taking into account physician access and other organizational variables, publicly funded programs prescribed fewer SUD medications than privately funded SUD treatment programs. Conclusions: Patients seeking treatment in publicly funded treatment programs continue to face disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment that supports patients' choices among a range of medication options. However, implementation of the Affordable Care Act may facilitate greater access to physicians and use of medications in publicly funded SUD treatment programs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873925477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873925477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 258

EP - 265

JO - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

JF - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

SN - 1937-1888

IS - 2

ER -