Discriminating mild parkinsonism

Methods for epidemiological research

Richard Camicioli, Sandra J. Grossmann, Peter Spencer, Ken Hudnell, Wyndham Anger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Methods for the efficient and accurate detection of parkinsonism are essential for epidemiological studies. We sought to determine whether parkinsonism could be detected by a neurologist from a videotaped assessment and whether neurobehavioral methods (motor, cognitive, and sensory) discriminated between patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and controls. Fifteen patients with mild PD (Hoehn and Yahr I-III) were compared to 15 age-, sex-, and education- matched controls. Each participant underwent a videotaped neurological examination (based on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, UPDRS), administered by a trained technician, and reviewed by a neurologist, as well as a series of neurobehavioral tests. The neurologist identified PD patients with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Among the neurobehavioral tests, finger tapping, combined with one or more among olfaction, visual contrast sensitivity, or Paired Associates Learning, correctly classified 90%, or more, of subjects. Individual psychological tests did not discriminate reliably between groups. We conclude that videotaped assessments of parkinsonism or objective tests of motor and sensory function can accurately detect patients with PD. Both approaches have potential for identifying PD cases, but the latter may be more efficient for screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-40
Number of pages8
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2001

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Methods
Parkinsonian Disorders
Parkinson Disease
Research
Paired-Associate Learning
Psychological Tests
Contrast Sensitivity
Sex Education
Smell
Neurologic Examination
Fingers
Epidemiologic Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Neurologists

Keywords

  • Olfaction
  • Parkinson's disease
  • Screening
  • Taping
  • Visual contrast sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Discriminating mild parkinsonism : Methods for epidemiological research. / Camicioli, Richard; Grossmann, Sandra J.; Spencer, Peter; Hudnell, Ken; Anger, Wyndham.

In: Movement Disorders, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.2001, p. 33-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Camicioli, Richard ; Grossmann, Sandra J. ; Spencer, Peter ; Hudnell, Ken ; Anger, Wyndham. / Discriminating mild parkinsonism : Methods for epidemiological research. In: Movement Disorders. 2001 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 33-40.
@article{d27a2392728d4cf9b07c1e2029563654,
title = "Discriminating mild parkinsonism: Methods for epidemiological research",
abstract = "Methods for the efficient and accurate detection of parkinsonism are essential for epidemiological studies. We sought to determine whether parkinsonism could be detected by a neurologist from a videotaped assessment and whether neurobehavioral methods (motor, cognitive, and sensory) discriminated between patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and controls. Fifteen patients with mild PD (Hoehn and Yahr I-III) were compared to 15 age-, sex-, and education- matched controls. Each participant underwent a videotaped neurological examination (based on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, UPDRS), administered by a trained technician, and reviewed by a neurologist, as well as a series of neurobehavioral tests. The neurologist identified PD patients with 86{\%} sensitivity and 100{\%} specificity. Among the neurobehavioral tests, finger tapping, combined with one or more among olfaction, visual contrast sensitivity, or Paired Associates Learning, correctly classified 90{\%}, or more, of subjects. Individual psychological tests did not discriminate reliably between groups. We conclude that videotaped assessments of parkinsonism or objective tests of motor and sensory function can accurately detect patients with PD. Both approaches have potential for identifying PD cases, but the latter may be more efficient for screening.",
keywords = "Olfaction, Parkinson's disease, Screening, Taping, Visual contrast sensitivity",
author = "Richard Camicioli and Grossmann, {Sandra J.} and Peter Spencer and Ken Hudnell and Wyndham Anger",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<33::AID-MDS1014>3.0.CO;2-W",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "33--40",
journal = "Movement Disorders",
issn = "0885-3185",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discriminating mild parkinsonism

T2 - Methods for epidemiological research

AU - Camicioli, Richard

AU - Grossmann, Sandra J.

AU - Spencer, Peter

AU - Hudnell, Ken

AU - Anger, Wyndham

PY - 2001/1

Y1 - 2001/1

N2 - Methods for the efficient and accurate detection of parkinsonism are essential for epidemiological studies. We sought to determine whether parkinsonism could be detected by a neurologist from a videotaped assessment and whether neurobehavioral methods (motor, cognitive, and sensory) discriminated between patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and controls. Fifteen patients with mild PD (Hoehn and Yahr I-III) were compared to 15 age-, sex-, and education- matched controls. Each participant underwent a videotaped neurological examination (based on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, UPDRS), administered by a trained technician, and reviewed by a neurologist, as well as a series of neurobehavioral tests. The neurologist identified PD patients with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Among the neurobehavioral tests, finger tapping, combined with one or more among olfaction, visual contrast sensitivity, or Paired Associates Learning, correctly classified 90%, or more, of subjects. Individual psychological tests did not discriminate reliably between groups. We conclude that videotaped assessments of parkinsonism or objective tests of motor and sensory function can accurately detect patients with PD. Both approaches have potential for identifying PD cases, but the latter may be more efficient for screening.

AB - Methods for the efficient and accurate detection of parkinsonism are essential for epidemiological studies. We sought to determine whether parkinsonism could be detected by a neurologist from a videotaped assessment and whether neurobehavioral methods (motor, cognitive, and sensory) discriminated between patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and controls. Fifteen patients with mild PD (Hoehn and Yahr I-III) were compared to 15 age-, sex-, and education- matched controls. Each participant underwent a videotaped neurological examination (based on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, UPDRS), administered by a trained technician, and reviewed by a neurologist, as well as a series of neurobehavioral tests. The neurologist identified PD patients with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Among the neurobehavioral tests, finger tapping, combined with one or more among olfaction, visual contrast sensitivity, or Paired Associates Learning, correctly classified 90%, or more, of subjects. Individual psychological tests did not discriminate reliably between groups. We conclude that videotaped assessments of parkinsonism or objective tests of motor and sensory function can accurately detect patients with PD. Both approaches have potential for identifying PD cases, but the latter may be more efficient for screening.

KW - Olfaction

KW - Parkinson's disease

KW - Screening

KW - Taping

KW - Visual contrast sensitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035241247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035241247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<33::AID-MDS1014>3.0.CO;2-W

DO - 10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<33::AID-MDS1014>3.0.CO;2-W

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 33

EP - 40

JO - Movement Disorders

JF - Movement Disorders

SN - 0885-3185

IS - 1

ER -