Disability Rating Scales in Parkinson's Disease

Critique and Recommendations

Lisa M. Shulman, Melissa Armstrong, Terry Ellis, Ann Gruber-Baldini, Fay Horak, Alice Nieuwboer, Sotirios Parashos, Bart Post, Mark Rogers, Andrew Siderowf, Christopher G. Goetz, Anette Schrag, Glenn T. Stebbins, Pablo Martinez-Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: PD is associated with impairments that progress over time to disability. A large number of disability scales exist with little information on the best choice in PD. Methods: Following methodology adopted by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Task Force, a review of disability scales used in PD was completed. Based on prespecified criteria, the review categorized scales into: “Recommended”; “Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required” when well-validated scales have not been specifically tested for clinimetric properties in PD; “Suggested”; and “Listed.”. Results: Twenty-nine disability instruments were identified with nine scales fulfilling criteria for “Recommended” and 7 “Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required.” Eight scales are “Suggested” and five scales are “Listed” for use in PD. The nine Recommended scales (Functional Status Questionnaire, Lawton-Brody Activities of Daily Living, Nottingham Activities of Daily Living, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living, Self-Assessment PD Disability, Short Parkinson's Evaluation Scale/Scales for Outcomes in PD, Unified PD Rating Scale–II: Activities of Daily Living, Movement Disorders Society UPDRS Motor Experiences of Daily Living, PROMIS® and Neuro-QoL Physical Function), and the seven Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required are reviewed. Conclusion: Many disability measures are available and recommended for application in PD. The Task Force does not recommend the development of a new scale. Selection of the most appropriate instrument for a particular objective requires consideration of the characteristics of each scale and the goals of the assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1455-1465
Number of pages11
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume31
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Activities of Daily Living
Parkinson Disease
Advisory Committees
Movement Disorders
England

Keywords

  • disability
  • Parkinson's disease
  • rating scales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Shulman, L. M., Armstrong, M., Ellis, T., Gruber-Baldini, A., Horak, F., Nieuwboer, A., ... Martinez-Martin, P. (2016). Disability Rating Scales in Parkinson's Disease: Critique and Recommendations. Movement Disorders, 31(10), 1455-1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26649

Disability Rating Scales in Parkinson's Disease : Critique and Recommendations. / Shulman, Lisa M.; Armstrong, Melissa; Ellis, Terry; Gruber-Baldini, Ann; Horak, Fay; Nieuwboer, Alice; Parashos, Sotirios; Post, Bart; Rogers, Mark; Siderowf, Andrew; Goetz, Christopher G.; Schrag, Anette; Stebbins, Glenn T.; Martinez-Martin, Pablo.

In: Movement Disorders, Vol. 31, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 1455-1465.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Shulman, LM, Armstrong, M, Ellis, T, Gruber-Baldini, A, Horak, F, Nieuwboer, A, Parashos, S, Post, B, Rogers, M, Siderowf, A, Goetz, CG, Schrag, A, Stebbins, GT & Martinez-Martin, P 2016, 'Disability Rating Scales in Parkinson's Disease: Critique and Recommendations', Movement Disorders, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1455-1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26649
Shulman LM, Armstrong M, Ellis T, Gruber-Baldini A, Horak F, Nieuwboer A et al. Disability Rating Scales in Parkinson's Disease: Critique and Recommendations. Movement Disorders. 2016 Oct 1;31(10):1455-1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26649
Shulman, Lisa M. ; Armstrong, Melissa ; Ellis, Terry ; Gruber-Baldini, Ann ; Horak, Fay ; Nieuwboer, Alice ; Parashos, Sotirios ; Post, Bart ; Rogers, Mark ; Siderowf, Andrew ; Goetz, Christopher G. ; Schrag, Anette ; Stebbins, Glenn T. ; Martinez-Martin, Pablo. / Disability Rating Scales in Parkinson's Disease : Critique and Recommendations. In: Movement Disorders. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 10. pp. 1455-1465.
@article{bb81e75e78ff47e89d4f8008a05fa934,
title = "Disability Rating Scales in Parkinson's Disease: Critique and Recommendations",
abstract = "Introduction: PD is associated with impairments that progress over time to disability. A large number of disability scales exist with little information on the best choice in PD. Methods: Following methodology adopted by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Task Force, a review of disability scales used in PD was completed. Based on prespecified criteria, the review categorized scales into: “Recommended”; “Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required” when well-validated scales have not been specifically tested for clinimetric properties in PD; “Suggested”; and “Listed.”. Results: Twenty-nine disability instruments were identified with nine scales fulfilling criteria for “Recommended” and 7 “Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required.” Eight scales are “Suggested” and five scales are “Listed” for use in PD. The nine Recommended scales (Functional Status Questionnaire, Lawton-Brody Activities of Daily Living, Nottingham Activities of Daily Living, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living, Self-Assessment PD Disability, Short Parkinson's Evaluation Scale/Scales for Outcomes in PD, Unified PD Rating Scale–II: Activities of Daily Living, Movement Disorders Society UPDRS Motor Experiences of Daily Living, PROMIS{\circledR} and Neuro-QoL Physical Function), and the seven Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required are reviewed. Conclusion: Many disability measures are available and recommended for application in PD. The Task Force does not recommend the development of a new scale. Selection of the most appropriate instrument for a particular objective requires consideration of the characteristics of each scale and the goals of the assessment.",
keywords = "disability, Parkinson's disease, rating scales",
author = "Shulman, {Lisa M.} and Melissa Armstrong and Terry Ellis and Ann Gruber-Baldini and Fay Horak and Alice Nieuwboer and Sotirios Parashos and Bart Post and Mark Rogers and Andrew Siderowf and Goetz, {Christopher G.} and Anette Schrag and Stebbins, {Glenn T.} and Pablo Martinez-Martin",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mds.26649",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1455--1465",
journal = "Movement Disorders",
issn = "0885-3185",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disability Rating Scales in Parkinson's Disease

T2 - Critique and Recommendations

AU - Shulman, Lisa M.

AU - Armstrong, Melissa

AU - Ellis, Terry

AU - Gruber-Baldini, Ann

AU - Horak, Fay

AU - Nieuwboer, Alice

AU - Parashos, Sotirios

AU - Post, Bart

AU - Rogers, Mark

AU - Siderowf, Andrew

AU - Goetz, Christopher G.

AU - Schrag, Anette

AU - Stebbins, Glenn T.

AU - Martinez-Martin, Pablo

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Introduction: PD is associated with impairments that progress over time to disability. A large number of disability scales exist with little information on the best choice in PD. Methods: Following methodology adopted by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Task Force, a review of disability scales used in PD was completed. Based on prespecified criteria, the review categorized scales into: “Recommended”; “Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required” when well-validated scales have not been specifically tested for clinimetric properties in PD; “Suggested”; and “Listed.”. Results: Twenty-nine disability instruments were identified with nine scales fulfilling criteria for “Recommended” and 7 “Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required.” Eight scales are “Suggested” and five scales are “Listed” for use in PD. The nine Recommended scales (Functional Status Questionnaire, Lawton-Brody Activities of Daily Living, Nottingham Activities of Daily Living, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living, Self-Assessment PD Disability, Short Parkinson's Evaluation Scale/Scales for Outcomes in PD, Unified PD Rating Scale–II: Activities of Daily Living, Movement Disorders Society UPDRS Motor Experiences of Daily Living, PROMIS® and Neuro-QoL Physical Function), and the seven Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required are reviewed. Conclusion: Many disability measures are available and recommended for application in PD. The Task Force does not recommend the development of a new scale. Selection of the most appropriate instrument for a particular objective requires consideration of the characteristics of each scale and the goals of the assessment.

AB - Introduction: PD is associated with impairments that progress over time to disability. A large number of disability scales exist with little information on the best choice in PD. Methods: Following methodology adopted by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Task Force, a review of disability scales used in PD was completed. Based on prespecified criteria, the review categorized scales into: “Recommended”; “Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required” when well-validated scales have not been specifically tested for clinimetric properties in PD; “Suggested”; and “Listed.”. Results: Twenty-nine disability instruments were identified with nine scales fulfilling criteria for “Recommended” and 7 “Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required.” Eight scales are “Suggested” and five scales are “Listed” for use in PD. The nine Recommended scales (Functional Status Questionnaire, Lawton-Brody Activities of Daily Living, Nottingham Activities of Daily Living, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living, Self-Assessment PD Disability, Short Parkinson's Evaluation Scale/Scales for Outcomes in PD, Unified PD Rating Scale–II: Activities of Daily Living, Movement Disorders Society UPDRS Motor Experiences of Daily Living, PROMIS® and Neuro-QoL Physical Function), and the seven Recommended with Further Validation in PD Required are reviewed. Conclusion: Many disability measures are available and recommended for application in PD. The Task Force does not recommend the development of a new scale. Selection of the most appropriate instrument for a particular objective requires consideration of the characteristics of each scale and the goals of the assessment.

KW - disability

KW - Parkinson's disease

KW - rating scales

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991276580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991276580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mds.26649

DO - 10.1002/mds.26649

M3 - Review article

VL - 31

SP - 1455

EP - 1465

JO - Movement Disorders

JF - Movement Disorders

SN - 0885-3185

IS - 10

ER -