Digitized Whole Slides for Breast Pathology Interpretation: Current Practices and Perceptions

Tracy Onega, Donald Weaver, Berta Geller, Natalia Oster, Anna N A Tosteson, Patricia (Patty) Carney, Heidi Nelson, Kimberly H. Allison, Frances P. O’Malley, Stuart J. Schnitt, Joann G. Elmore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation; however, little is known about pathologists’ practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI. A national sample (N = 252) of pathologists from New Hampshire, Vermont, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Alaska, Maine, and Minnesota were surveyed in this cross-sectional study (2011–2013). The survey included questions on pathologists’ experience, WSI practice patterns, and perceptions using a six-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists’ use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were males (63 %) between 40 and 59 years of age (70 %) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (72 %). Experience with WSI was reported by 49 %. Types of use reported included CME/board exams/teaching (28 %), tumor board/clinical conference (22 %), archival purposes (6 %), consultative diagnosis (4 %), research (4 %), and other uses (12 %). Most respondents (79 %) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and that WSI is useful for obtaining a second opinion (88 %). However, 78 % of pathologists agreed that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. Fifty-nine percent agreed that the benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (51 %) or not (49 %). About half of pathologists reported experience with the WSI technology, largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)642-648
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Pathology
Breast
Imaging techniques
Technology
Teaching
Licensure
Pathologists
Referral and Consultation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Tumors
Research
Statistics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Digital whole slide imaging
  • Pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Digitized Whole Slides for Breast Pathology Interpretation : Current Practices and Perceptions. / Onega, Tracy; Weaver, Donald; Geller, Berta; Oster, Natalia; Tosteson, Anna N A; Carney, Patricia (Patty); Nelson, Heidi; Allison, Kimberly H.; O’Malley, Frances P.; Schnitt, Stuart J.; Elmore, Joann G.

In: Journal of Digital Imaging, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2014, p. 642-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Onega, T, Weaver, D, Geller, B, Oster, N, Tosteson, ANA, Carney, PP, Nelson, H, Allison, KH, O’Malley, FP, Schnitt, SJ & Elmore, JG 2014, 'Digitized Whole Slides for Breast Pathology Interpretation: Current Practices and Perceptions', Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 642-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9683-2
Onega, Tracy ; Weaver, Donald ; Geller, Berta ; Oster, Natalia ; Tosteson, Anna N A ; Carney, Patricia (Patty) ; Nelson, Heidi ; Allison, Kimberly H. ; O’Malley, Frances P. ; Schnitt, Stuart J. ; Elmore, Joann G. / Digitized Whole Slides for Breast Pathology Interpretation : Current Practices and Perceptions. In: Journal of Digital Imaging. 2014 ; Vol. 27, No. 5. pp. 642-648.
@article{938278280533491e9edca7df1017397d,
title = "Digitized Whole Slides for Breast Pathology Interpretation: Current Practices and Perceptions",
abstract = "Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation; however, little is known about pathologists’ practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI. A national sample (N = 252) of pathologists from New Hampshire, Vermont, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Alaska, Maine, and Minnesota were surveyed in this cross-sectional study (2011–2013). The survey included questions on pathologists’ experience, WSI practice patterns, and perceptions using a six-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists’ use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were males (63 {\%}) between 40 and 59 years of age (70 {\%}) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (72 {\%}). Experience with WSI was reported by 49 {\%}. Types of use reported included CME/board exams/teaching (28 {\%}), tumor board/clinical conference (22 {\%}), archival purposes (6 {\%}), consultative diagnosis (4 {\%}), research (4 {\%}), and other uses (12 {\%}). Most respondents (79 {\%}) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and that WSI is useful for obtaining a second opinion (88 {\%}). However, 78 {\%} of pathologists agreed that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. Fifty-nine percent agreed that the benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (51 {\%}) or not (49 {\%}). About half of pathologists reported experience with the WSI technology, largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.",
keywords = "Digital whole slide imaging, Pathology",
author = "Tracy Onega and Donald Weaver and Berta Geller and Natalia Oster and Tosteson, {Anna N A} and Carney, {Patricia (Patty)} and Heidi Nelson and Allison, {Kimberly H.} and O’Malley, {Frances P.} and Schnitt, {Stuart J.} and Elmore, {Joann G.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10278-014-9683-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "642--648",
journal = "Journal of Digital Imaging",
issn = "0897-1889",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digitized Whole Slides for Breast Pathology Interpretation

T2 - Current Practices and Perceptions

AU - Onega, Tracy

AU - Weaver, Donald

AU - Geller, Berta

AU - Oster, Natalia

AU - Tosteson, Anna N A

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

AU - Nelson, Heidi

AU - Allison, Kimberly H.

AU - O’Malley, Frances P.

AU - Schnitt, Stuart J.

AU - Elmore, Joann G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation; however, little is known about pathologists’ practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI. A national sample (N = 252) of pathologists from New Hampshire, Vermont, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Alaska, Maine, and Minnesota were surveyed in this cross-sectional study (2011–2013). The survey included questions on pathologists’ experience, WSI practice patterns, and perceptions using a six-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists’ use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were males (63 %) between 40 and 59 years of age (70 %) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (72 %). Experience with WSI was reported by 49 %. Types of use reported included CME/board exams/teaching (28 %), tumor board/clinical conference (22 %), archival purposes (6 %), consultative diagnosis (4 %), research (4 %), and other uses (12 %). Most respondents (79 %) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and that WSI is useful for obtaining a second opinion (88 %). However, 78 % of pathologists agreed that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. Fifty-nine percent agreed that the benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (51 %) or not (49 %). About half of pathologists reported experience with the WSI technology, largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.

AB - Digital whole slide imaging (WSI) is an emerging technology for pathology interpretation; however, little is known about pathologists’ practice patterns or perceptions regarding WSI. A national sample (N = 252) of pathologists from New Hampshire, Vermont, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Alaska, Maine, and Minnesota were surveyed in this cross-sectional study (2011–2013). The survey included questions on pathologists’ experience, WSI practice patterns, and perceptions using a six-point Likert scale. Agreement was summarized with descriptive statistics to characterize pathologists’ use and perceptions of WSI. The majority of participating pathologists were males (63 %) between 40 and 59 years of age (70 %) and not affiliated with an academic medical center (72 %). Experience with WSI was reported by 49 %. Types of use reported included CME/board exams/teaching (28 %), tumor board/clinical conference (22 %), archival purposes (6 %), consultative diagnosis (4 %), research (4 %), and other uses (12 %). Most respondents (79 %) agreed that accurate diagnoses can be made with this technology, and that WSI is useful for obtaining a second opinion (88 %). However, 78 % of pathologists agreed that digital slides are too slow for routine clinical interpretation. Fifty-nine percent agreed that the benefits of WSI outweigh concerns. The respondents were equally split as to whether they would like to adopt WSI (51 %) or not (49 %). About half of pathologists reported experience with the WSI technology, largely for CME, licensure/board exams, and teaching. Positive perceptions regarding WSI slightly outweigh negative perceptions. Understanding practice patterns with WSI as dissemination advances may facilitate concordance of perceptions with adoption of the technology.

KW - Digital whole slide imaging

KW - Pathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925839068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925839068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10278-014-9683-2

DO - 10.1007/s10278-014-9683-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 24682769

AN - SCOPUS:84925839068

VL - 27

SP - 642

EP - 648

JO - Journal of Digital Imaging

JF - Journal of Digital Imaging

SN - 0897-1889

IS - 5

ER -