Differential Performance of SF-36 Items in Healthy Adults With and Without Functional Limitations

Willi Horner-Johnson, Gloria L. Krahn, Rie Suzuki, Jana J. Peterson, Gale Roid, Trevor Hall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, Peterson JJ, Roid G, Hall T, the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement. Differential performance of SF-36 items in healthy adults with and without functional limitations. Objective: To determine whether Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) items show differential item functioning among healthy adults with various types of functional limitations as compared with a healthy sample with no identified limitations. Design: Survey responses were analyzed by using partial correlations. Setting: General community. Participants: Participants (N=206) included (1) adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) adults who were deaf or hard of hearing, (3) adults who were legally blind, (4) adults with psychiatric or emotional conditions, and (5) adults with no reported functional limitations. Participants were screened to ensure the absence of substantial health problems. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: SF-36. Results: Partial correlations showed a significant negative correlation, indicating differential item functioning (ie, apparent bias) for people with SCI on all 10 SF-36 Physical Functioning items. For people who were blind, 5 items showed a significant negative correlation. Two items had significant negative correlations for the deaf/hard-of-hearing group. One item showed significant negative performance for people with mental health conditions. Conclusions: Our data indicated a possibility for measurement bias caused by the blending of health and function concepts in the SF-36.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)570-575
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume91
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Hearing
Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health Surveys
Psychiatry
Mental Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Disabled persons
  • Health surveys
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Differential Performance of SF-36 Items in Healthy Adults With and Without Functional Limitations. / Horner-Johnson, Willi; Krahn, Gloria L.; Suzuki, Rie; Peterson, Jana J.; Roid, Gale; Hall, Trevor.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 91, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 570-575.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d39aaf288301441d8a0ecc414eac9fb5,
title = "Differential Performance of SF-36 Items in Healthy Adults With and Without Functional Limitations",
abstract = "Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, Peterson JJ, Roid G, Hall T, the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement. Differential performance of SF-36 items in healthy adults with and without functional limitations. Objective: To determine whether Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) items show differential item functioning among healthy adults with various types of functional limitations as compared with a healthy sample with no identified limitations. Design: Survey responses were analyzed by using partial correlations. Setting: General community. Participants: Participants (N=206) included (1) adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) adults who were deaf or hard of hearing, (3) adults who were legally blind, (4) adults with psychiatric or emotional conditions, and (5) adults with no reported functional limitations. Participants were screened to ensure the absence of substantial health problems. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: SF-36. Results: Partial correlations showed a significant negative correlation, indicating differential item functioning (ie, apparent bias) for people with SCI on all 10 SF-36 Physical Functioning items. For people who were blind, 5 items showed a significant negative correlation. Two items had significant negative correlations for the deaf/hard-of-hearing group. One item showed significant negative performance for people with mental health conditions. Conclusions: Our data indicated a possibility for measurement bias caused by the blending of health and function concepts in the SF-36.",
keywords = "Bias, Disabled persons, Health surveys, Rehabilitation",
author = "Willi Horner-Johnson and Krahn, {Gloria L.} and Rie Suzuki and Peterson, {Jana J.} and Gale Roid and Trevor Hall",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "570--575",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential Performance of SF-36 Items in Healthy Adults With and Without Functional Limitations

AU - Horner-Johnson, Willi

AU - Krahn, Gloria L.

AU - Suzuki, Rie

AU - Peterson, Jana J.

AU - Roid, Gale

AU - Hall, Trevor

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, Peterson JJ, Roid G, Hall T, the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement. Differential performance of SF-36 items in healthy adults with and without functional limitations. Objective: To determine whether Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) items show differential item functioning among healthy adults with various types of functional limitations as compared with a healthy sample with no identified limitations. Design: Survey responses were analyzed by using partial correlations. Setting: General community. Participants: Participants (N=206) included (1) adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) adults who were deaf or hard of hearing, (3) adults who were legally blind, (4) adults with psychiatric or emotional conditions, and (5) adults with no reported functional limitations. Participants were screened to ensure the absence of substantial health problems. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: SF-36. Results: Partial correlations showed a significant negative correlation, indicating differential item functioning (ie, apparent bias) for people with SCI on all 10 SF-36 Physical Functioning items. For people who were blind, 5 items showed a significant negative correlation. Two items had significant negative correlations for the deaf/hard-of-hearing group. One item showed significant negative performance for people with mental health conditions. Conclusions: Our data indicated a possibility for measurement bias caused by the blending of health and function concepts in the SF-36.

AB - Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, Peterson JJ, Roid G, Hall T, the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement. Differential performance of SF-36 items in healthy adults with and without functional limitations. Objective: To determine whether Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) items show differential item functioning among healthy adults with various types of functional limitations as compared with a healthy sample with no identified limitations. Design: Survey responses were analyzed by using partial correlations. Setting: General community. Participants: Participants (N=206) included (1) adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) adults who were deaf or hard of hearing, (3) adults who were legally blind, (4) adults with psychiatric or emotional conditions, and (5) adults with no reported functional limitations. Participants were screened to ensure the absence of substantial health problems. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: SF-36. Results: Partial correlations showed a significant negative correlation, indicating differential item functioning (ie, apparent bias) for people with SCI on all 10 SF-36 Physical Functioning items. For people who were blind, 5 items showed a significant negative correlation. Two items had significant negative correlations for the deaf/hard-of-hearing group. One item showed significant negative performance for people with mental health conditions. Conclusions: Our data indicated a possibility for measurement bias caused by the blending of health and function concepts in the SF-36.

KW - Bias

KW - Disabled persons

KW - Health surveys

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950491739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950491739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.015

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.015

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 570

EP - 575

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 4

ER -