Differences in stress-related ratings between research center and home environments in dementia caregivers using ecological momentary assessment

Irina Fonareva, Alexandra M. Amen, Roger M. Ellingson, Barry Oken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Clinicians and researchers working with dementia caregivers typically assess caregiver stress in a clinic or research center, but caregivers stress is rooted at home where they provide care. This study aimed to compare ratings of stress-related measures obtained in research settings and in the home using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Methods: EMA of 18 caregivers (mean age 66.4 years ±7.8; 89% females) and 23 non-caregivers (mean age 66.4 years ±7.9; 87% females) was implemented using a personal digital assistant. Subjects rated their perceived stress, fatigue, coping with current situation, mindfulness, and situational demand once in the research center and again at 3-4 semi-random points during a day at home. The data from several assessments conducted at home were averaged for statistical analyses and compared with the data collected in the research center. Results: The testing environment had a differential effect on caregivers and non-caregivers for the ratings of perceived stress (p <0.01) and situational demand (p = 0.01). When tested in the research center, ratings for all measures were similar between groups, but when tested at home, caregivers rated their perceived stress as higher than non-caregivers (p = 0.02). Overall, caregivers reported higher perceived stress at home than in the research center (p = 0.02), and non-caregivers reported greater situational demand in the research center than at home (p <0.01). Conclusions: The assessment method and environment affect stress-related outcomes. Evaluating participants in their natural environment provides a more sensitive measure of stress-related outcomes. EMA provides a convenient way to gather data when evaluating dementia caregivers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)90-98
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Dementia
Research
Handheld Computers
Mindfulness
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Home Care Services
Fatigue
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • caregivers
  • ecological momentary assessment
  • EMA
  • older adults
  • perceived stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Gerontology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Differences in stress-related ratings between research center and home environments in dementia caregivers using ecological momentary assessment. / Fonareva, Irina; Amen, Alexandra M.; Ellingson, Roger M.; Oken, Barry.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 90-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{af6bde9e15e24a798cd5f0bce0a5a54a,
title = "Differences in stress-related ratings between research center and home environments in dementia caregivers using ecological momentary assessment",
abstract = "Background: Clinicians and researchers working with dementia caregivers typically assess caregiver stress in a clinic or research center, but caregivers stress is rooted at home where they provide care. This study aimed to compare ratings of stress-related measures obtained in research settings and in the home using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Methods: EMA of 18 caregivers (mean age 66.4 years ±7.8; 89{\%} females) and 23 non-caregivers (mean age 66.4 years ±7.9; 87{\%} females) was implemented using a personal digital assistant. Subjects rated their perceived stress, fatigue, coping with current situation, mindfulness, and situational demand once in the research center and again at 3-4 semi-random points during a day at home. The data from several assessments conducted at home were averaged for statistical analyses and compared with the data collected in the research center. Results: The testing environment had a differential effect on caregivers and non-caregivers for the ratings of perceived stress (p <0.01) and situational demand (p = 0.01). When tested in the research center, ratings for all measures were similar between groups, but when tested at home, caregivers rated their perceived stress as higher than non-caregivers (p = 0.02). Overall, caregivers reported higher perceived stress at home than in the research center (p = 0.02), and non-caregivers reported greater situational demand in the research center than at home (p <0.01). Conclusions: The assessment method and environment affect stress-related outcomes. Evaluating participants in their natural environment provides a more sensitive measure of stress-related outcomes. EMA provides a convenient way to gather data when evaluating dementia caregivers.",
keywords = "caregivers, ecological momentary assessment, EMA, older adults, perceived stress",
author = "Irina Fonareva and Amen, {Alexandra M.} and Ellingson, {Roger M.} and Barry Oken",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1041610211001414",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "90--98",
journal = "International Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1041-6102",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in stress-related ratings between research center and home environments in dementia caregivers using ecological momentary assessment

AU - Fonareva, Irina

AU - Amen, Alexandra M.

AU - Ellingson, Roger M.

AU - Oken, Barry

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Background: Clinicians and researchers working with dementia caregivers typically assess caregiver stress in a clinic or research center, but caregivers stress is rooted at home where they provide care. This study aimed to compare ratings of stress-related measures obtained in research settings and in the home using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Methods: EMA of 18 caregivers (mean age 66.4 years ±7.8; 89% females) and 23 non-caregivers (mean age 66.4 years ±7.9; 87% females) was implemented using a personal digital assistant. Subjects rated their perceived stress, fatigue, coping with current situation, mindfulness, and situational demand once in the research center and again at 3-4 semi-random points during a day at home. The data from several assessments conducted at home were averaged for statistical analyses and compared with the data collected in the research center. Results: The testing environment had a differential effect on caregivers and non-caregivers for the ratings of perceived stress (p <0.01) and situational demand (p = 0.01). When tested in the research center, ratings for all measures were similar between groups, but when tested at home, caregivers rated their perceived stress as higher than non-caregivers (p = 0.02). Overall, caregivers reported higher perceived stress at home than in the research center (p = 0.02), and non-caregivers reported greater situational demand in the research center than at home (p <0.01). Conclusions: The assessment method and environment affect stress-related outcomes. Evaluating participants in their natural environment provides a more sensitive measure of stress-related outcomes. EMA provides a convenient way to gather data when evaluating dementia caregivers.

AB - Background: Clinicians and researchers working with dementia caregivers typically assess caregiver stress in a clinic or research center, but caregivers stress is rooted at home where they provide care. This study aimed to compare ratings of stress-related measures obtained in research settings and in the home using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Methods: EMA of 18 caregivers (mean age 66.4 years ±7.8; 89% females) and 23 non-caregivers (mean age 66.4 years ±7.9; 87% females) was implemented using a personal digital assistant. Subjects rated their perceived stress, fatigue, coping with current situation, mindfulness, and situational demand once in the research center and again at 3-4 semi-random points during a day at home. The data from several assessments conducted at home were averaged for statistical analyses and compared with the data collected in the research center. Results: The testing environment had a differential effect on caregivers and non-caregivers for the ratings of perceived stress (p <0.01) and situational demand (p = 0.01). When tested in the research center, ratings for all measures were similar between groups, but when tested at home, caregivers rated their perceived stress as higher than non-caregivers (p = 0.02). Overall, caregivers reported higher perceived stress at home than in the research center (p = 0.02), and non-caregivers reported greater situational demand in the research center than at home (p <0.01). Conclusions: The assessment method and environment affect stress-related outcomes. Evaluating participants in their natural environment provides a more sensitive measure of stress-related outcomes. EMA provides a convenient way to gather data when evaluating dementia caregivers.

KW - caregivers

KW - ecological momentary assessment

KW - EMA

KW - older adults

KW - perceived stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82055172740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82055172740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1041610211001414

DO - 10.1017/S1041610211001414

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 90

EP - 98

JO - International Psychogeriatrics

JF - International Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1041-6102

IS - 1

ER -