Diagnosis and Testing in Bronchiolitis: A Systematic Review

W. Clayton Bordley, Meera Viswanathan, Valerie King, Sonya F. Sutton, Anne M. Jackman, Laura Sterling, Kathleen N. Lohr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of bronchiolitis is based on typical history and results of a physical examination. The indications for and utility of diagnostic and supportive laboratory testing (eg, chest x-ray films, complete blood cell counts, and respiratory syncytial virus testing) are unclear. Objectives: To review systematically the data on diagnostic and supportive testing in the management of bronchiolitis and to assess the utility of such testing. Design: In conjunction with an expert panel, we generated admissibility criteria and derived relevant terms to search the literature published from 1980 to November 2002 in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Database of Controlled Clinical Trials. Trained abstractors completed detailed data collection forms for each article. We summarized the data in tables after performing data integrity checks. Results: Of the 797 abstracts identified, we present evidence from 82 trials that met our inclusion criteria (17 are primary articles on diagnosis of bronchiolitis and 65 are reports of treatment or prevention trials). Numerous studies demonstrate that rapid respiratory syncytial virus tests have acceptable sensitivity and specificity, but no data show that respiratory syncytial virus testing affects clinical outcomes in typical cases of the disease. Seventeen studies presented chest x-ray film data. Abnormalities on chest x-ray films ranged from 20% to 96%. Insufficient data exist to show that chest x-ray films reliably distinguish between viral and bacterial disease or predict severity of disease. Ten studies included complete blood cell counts, but most did not present specific results. In one study, white blood cell counts correlated with radiologically defined disease categories of bronchiolitis. Conclusions: A large number of studies include diagnostic and supportive testing data. However, these studies do not define clear indications for such testing or the impact of testing on relevant patient outcomes. Given the high prevalence of this disease, prospective studies of the utility of such testing are needed and feasible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-126
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Volume158
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bronchiolitis
Blood Cell Count
Motion Pictures
Respiratory Syncytial Viruses
Thorax
X-Rays
Controlled Clinical Trials
Virus Diseases
Leukocyte Count
MEDLINE
Physical Examination
History
Databases
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Bordley, W. C., Viswanathan, M., King, V., Sutton, S. F., Jackman, A. M., Sterling, L., & Lohr, K. N. (2004). Diagnosis and Testing in Bronchiolitis: A Systematic Review. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 158(2), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.158.2.119

Diagnosis and Testing in Bronchiolitis : A Systematic Review. / Bordley, W. Clayton; Viswanathan, Meera; King, Valerie; Sutton, Sonya F.; Jackman, Anne M.; Sterling, Laura; Lohr, Kathleen N.

In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Vol. 158, No. 2, 02.2004, p. 119-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bordley, WC, Viswanathan, M, King, V, Sutton, SF, Jackman, AM, Sterling, L & Lohr, KN 2004, 'Diagnosis and Testing in Bronchiolitis: A Systematic Review', Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.158.2.119
Bordley, W. Clayton ; Viswanathan, Meera ; King, Valerie ; Sutton, Sonya F. ; Jackman, Anne M. ; Sterling, Laura ; Lohr, Kathleen N. / Diagnosis and Testing in Bronchiolitis : A Systematic Review. In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 158, No. 2. pp. 119-126.
@article{7ab08f975ca54dc7a5f76ca0d26452b2,
title = "Diagnosis and Testing in Bronchiolitis: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Background: The diagnosis of bronchiolitis is based on typical history and results of a physical examination. The indications for and utility of diagnostic and supportive laboratory testing (eg, chest x-ray films, complete blood cell counts, and respiratory syncytial virus testing) are unclear. Objectives: To review systematically the data on diagnostic and supportive testing in the management of bronchiolitis and to assess the utility of such testing. Design: In conjunction with an expert panel, we generated admissibility criteria and derived relevant terms to search the literature published from 1980 to November 2002 in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Database of Controlled Clinical Trials. Trained abstractors completed detailed data collection forms for each article. We summarized the data in tables after performing data integrity checks. Results: Of the 797 abstracts identified, we present evidence from 82 trials that met our inclusion criteria (17 are primary articles on diagnosis of bronchiolitis and 65 are reports of treatment or prevention trials). Numerous studies demonstrate that rapid respiratory syncytial virus tests have acceptable sensitivity and specificity, but no data show that respiratory syncytial virus testing affects clinical outcomes in typical cases of the disease. Seventeen studies presented chest x-ray film data. Abnormalities on chest x-ray films ranged from 20{\%} to 96{\%}. Insufficient data exist to show that chest x-ray films reliably distinguish between viral and bacterial disease or predict severity of disease. Ten studies included complete blood cell counts, but most did not present specific results. In one study, white blood cell counts correlated with radiologically defined disease categories of bronchiolitis. Conclusions: A large number of studies include diagnostic and supportive testing data. However, these studies do not define clear indications for such testing or the impact of testing on relevant patient outcomes. Given the high prevalence of this disease, prospective studies of the utility of such testing are needed and feasible.",
author = "Bordley, {W. Clayton} and Meera Viswanathan and Valerie King and Sutton, {Sonya F.} and Jackman, {Anne M.} and Laura Sterling and Lohr, {Kathleen N.}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1001/archpedi.158.2.119",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "119--126",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis and Testing in Bronchiolitis

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Bordley, W. Clayton

AU - Viswanathan, Meera

AU - King, Valerie

AU - Sutton, Sonya F.

AU - Jackman, Anne M.

AU - Sterling, Laura

AU - Lohr, Kathleen N.

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - Background: The diagnosis of bronchiolitis is based on typical history and results of a physical examination. The indications for and utility of diagnostic and supportive laboratory testing (eg, chest x-ray films, complete blood cell counts, and respiratory syncytial virus testing) are unclear. Objectives: To review systematically the data on diagnostic and supportive testing in the management of bronchiolitis and to assess the utility of such testing. Design: In conjunction with an expert panel, we generated admissibility criteria and derived relevant terms to search the literature published from 1980 to November 2002 in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Database of Controlled Clinical Trials. Trained abstractors completed detailed data collection forms for each article. We summarized the data in tables after performing data integrity checks. Results: Of the 797 abstracts identified, we present evidence from 82 trials that met our inclusion criteria (17 are primary articles on diagnosis of bronchiolitis and 65 are reports of treatment or prevention trials). Numerous studies demonstrate that rapid respiratory syncytial virus tests have acceptable sensitivity and specificity, but no data show that respiratory syncytial virus testing affects clinical outcomes in typical cases of the disease. Seventeen studies presented chest x-ray film data. Abnormalities on chest x-ray films ranged from 20% to 96%. Insufficient data exist to show that chest x-ray films reliably distinguish between viral and bacterial disease or predict severity of disease. Ten studies included complete blood cell counts, but most did not present specific results. In one study, white blood cell counts correlated with radiologically defined disease categories of bronchiolitis. Conclusions: A large number of studies include diagnostic and supportive testing data. However, these studies do not define clear indications for such testing or the impact of testing on relevant patient outcomes. Given the high prevalence of this disease, prospective studies of the utility of such testing are needed and feasible.

AB - Background: The diagnosis of bronchiolitis is based on typical history and results of a physical examination. The indications for and utility of diagnostic and supportive laboratory testing (eg, chest x-ray films, complete blood cell counts, and respiratory syncytial virus testing) are unclear. Objectives: To review systematically the data on diagnostic and supportive testing in the management of bronchiolitis and to assess the utility of such testing. Design: In conjunction with an expert panel, we generated admissibility criteria and derived relevant terms to search the literature published from 1980 to November 2002 in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Database of Controlled Clinical Trials. Trained abstractors completed detailed data collection forms for each article. We summarized the data in tables after performing data integrity checks. Results: Of the 797 abstracts identified, we present evidence from 82 trials that met our inclusion criteria (17 are primary articles on diagnosis of bronchiolitis and 65 are reports of treatment or prevention trials). Numerous studies demonstrate that rapid respiratory syncytial virus tests have acceptable sensitivity and specificity, but no data show that respiratory syncytial virus testing affects clinical outcomes in typical cases of the disease. Seventeen studies presented chest x-ray film data. Abnormalities on chest x-ray films ranged from 20% to 96%. Insufficient data exist to show that chest x-ray films reliably distinguish between viral and bacterial disease or predict severity of disease. Ten studies included complete blood cell counts, but most did not present specific results. In one study, white blood cell counts correlated with radiologically defined disease categories of bronchiolitis. Conclusions: A large number of studies include diagnostic and supportive testing data. However, these studies do not define clear indications for such testing or the impact of testing on relevant patient outcomes. Given the high prevalence of this disease, prospective studies of the utility of such testing are needed and feasible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0842311638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0842311638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpedi.158.2.119

DO - 10.1001/archpedi.158.2.119

M3 - Article

C2 - 14757603

AN - SCOPUS:0842311638

VL - 158

SP - 119

EP - 126

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 2

ER -