Development of valid and reliable measures of patient and family experiences of hospice care for public reporting

Rebecca Anhang Price, Brian Stucky, Layla Parast, Marc N. Elliott, Ann Haas, Melissa Bradley, Joan Teno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Increasingly, dying patients and their families have a choice of hospice providers. Care quality varies considerably across providers; informing consumers of these differences may help to improve their selection of hospices. Objective: To develop and evaluate standardized survey measures of hospice care experiences for the purpose of comparing and publicly reporting hospice performance. Design: We assessed item performance and constructed composite measures by factor analysis, evaluating item-scale correlations and estimating reliability. To assess key drivers of overall experiences, we regressed overall rating and willingness to recommend the hospice on each composite. Setting/Subjects: Data submitted by 2500 hospices participating in national implementation of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Hospice Survey for April through September 2015. Measurements: Composite measures of Hospice Team Communication, Getting Timely Care, Treating Family Member with Respect, Getting Emotional and Religious Support, Getting Help for Symptoms, and Getting Hospice Care Training. Results: Cronbach's alpha estimates for the composite measures range from 0.61 to 0.85; hospice-level reliability for the measures range from 0.67 to 0.81 assuming 200 completed surveys per hospice. Together, the composites are responsible for 48% of the variance in caregivers' overall ratings of hospices. Hospice Team Communication is the strongest predictor of overall rating of care. Conclusion: Our analyses provide evidence of the reliability and validity of CAHPS Hospice Survey measure scores. Results also highlight important opportunities to improve the quality of hospice care, particularly with regard to addressing symptoms of anxiety and sadness, discussing side effects of pain medicine, and keeping family informed of the patient's condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)924-932
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of palliative medicine
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Hospice Care
Hospices
Quality of Health Care
Health Personnel
Communication
Delivery of Health Care
Reproducibility of Results
Caregivers
Statistical Factor Analysis

Keywords

  • bereaved family survey
  • CAHPS
  • hospice care
  • patient and family care experiences
  • quality measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Development of valid and reliable measures of patient and family experiences of hospice care for public reporting. / Price, Rebecca Anhang; Stucky, Brian; Parast, Layla; Elliott, Marc N.; Haas, Ann; Bradley, Melissa; Teno, Joan.

In: Journal of palliative medicine, Vol. 21, No. 7, 01.07.2018, p. 924-932.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Price, Rebecca Anhang ; Stucky, Brian ; Parast, Layla ; Elliott, Marc N. ; Haas, Ann ; Bradley, Melissa ; Teno, Joan. / Development of valid and reliable measures of patient and family experiences of hospice care for public reporting. In: Journal of palliative medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 7. pp. 924-932.
@article{ca83d13586ad4251803403e1441fb966,
title = "Development of valid and reliable measures of patient and family experiences of hospice care for public reporting",
abstract = "Background: Increasingly, dying patients and their families have a choice of hospice providers. Care quality varies considerably across providers; informing consumers of these differences may help to improve their selection of hospices. Objective: To develop and evaluate standardized survey measures of hospice care experiences for the purpose of comparing and publicly reporting hospice performance. Design: We assessed item performance and constructed composite measures by factor analysis, evaluating item-scale correlations and estimating reliability. To assess key drivers of overall experiences, we regressed overall rating and willingness to recommend the hospice on each composite. Setting/Subjects: Data submitted by 2500 hospices participating in national implementation of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS{\circledR}) Hospice Survey for April through September 2015. Measurements: Composite measures of Hospice Team Communication, Getting Timely Care, Treating Family Member with Respect, Getting Emotional and Religious Support, Getting Help for Symptoms, and Getting Hospice Care Training. Results: Cronbach's alpha estimates for the composite measures range from 0.61 to 0.85; hospice-level reliability for the measures range from 0.67 to 0.81 assuming 200 completed surveys per hospice. Together, the composites are responsible for 48{\%} of the variance in caregivers' overall ratings of hospices. Hospice Team Communication is the strongest predictor of overall rating of care. Conclusion: Our analyses provide evidence of the reliability and validity of CAHPS Hospice Survey measure scores. Results also highlight important opportunities to improve the quality of hospice care, particularly with regard to addressing symptoms of anxiety and sadness, discussing side effects of pain medicine, and keeping family informed of the patient's condition.",
keywords = "bereaved family survey, CAHPS, hospice care, patient and family care experiences, quality measurement",
author = "Price, {Rebecca Anhang} and Brian Stucky and Layla Parast and Elliott, {Marc N.} and Ann Haas and Melissa Bradley and Joan Teno",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.2017.0594",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "924--932",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of valid and reliable measures of patient and family experiences of hospice care for public reporting

AU - Price, Rebecca Anhang

AU - Stucky, Brian

AU - Parast, Layla

AU - Elliott, Marc N.

AU - Haas, Ann

AU - Bradley, Melissa

AU - Teno, Joan

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Background: Increasingly, dying patients and their families have a choice of hospice providers. Care quality varies considerably across providers; informing consumers of these differences may help to improve their selection of hospices. Objective: To develop and evaluate standardized survey measures of hospice care experiences for the purpose of comparing and publicly reporting hospice performance. Design: We assessed item performance and constructed composite measures by factor analysis, evaluating item-scale correlations and estimating reliability. To assess key drivers of overall experiences, we regressed overall rating and willingness to recommend the hospice on each composite. Setting/Subjects: Data submitted by 2500 hospices participating in national implementation of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Hospice Survey for April through September 2015. Measurements: Composite measures of Hospice Team Communication, Getting Timely Care, Treating Family Member with Respect, Getting Emotional and Religious Support, Getting Help for Symptoms, and Getting Hospice Care Training. Results: Cronbach's alpha estimates for the composite measures range from 0.61 to 0.85; hospice-level reliability for the measures range from 0.67 to 0.81 assuming 200 completed surveys per hospice. Together, the composites are responsible for 48% of the variance in caregivers' overall ratings of hospices. Hospice Team Communication is the strongest predictor of overall rating of care. Conclusion: Our analyses provide evidence of the reliability and validity of CAHPS Hospice Survey measure scores. Results also highlight important opportunities to improve the quality of hospice care, particularly with regard to addressing symptoms of anxiety and sadness, discussing side effects of pain medicine, and keeping family informed of the patient's condition.

AB - Background: Increasingly, dying patients and their families have a choice of hospice providers. Care quality varies considerably across providers; informing consumers of these differences may help to improve their selection of hospices. Objective: To develop and evaluate standardized survey measures of hospice care experiences for the purpose of comparing and publicly reporting hospice performance. Design: We assessed item performance and constructed composite measures by factor analysis, evaluating item-scale correlations and estimating reliability. To assess key drivers of overall experiences, we regressed overall rating and willingness to recommend the hospice on each composite. Setting/Subjects: Data submitted by 2500 hospices participating in national implementation of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Hospice Survey for April through September 2015. Measurements: Composite measures of Hospice Team Communication, Getting Timely Care, Treating Family Member with Respect, Getting Emotional and Religious Support, Getting Help for Symptoms, and Getting Hospice Care Training. Results: Cronbach's alpha estimates for the composite measures range from 0.61 to 0.85; hospice-level reliability for the measures range from 0.67 to 0.81 assuming 200 completed surveys per hospice. Together, the composites are responsible for 48% of the variance in caregivers' overall ratings of hospices. Hospice Team Communication is the strongest predictor of overall rating of care. Conclusion: Our analyses provide evidence of the reliability and validity of CAHPS Hospice Survey measure scores. Results also highlight important opportunities to improve the quality of hospice care, particularly with regard to addressing symptoms of anxiety and sadness, discussing side effects of pain medicine, and keeping family informed of the patient's condition.

KW - bereaved family survey

KW - CAHPS

KW - hospice care

KW - patient and family care experiences

KW - quality measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049588700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049588700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2017.0594

DO - 10.1089/jpm.2017.0594

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 924

EP - 932

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 7

ER -