Development of an evidence-based review with recommendations using an online iterative process

Luke Rudmik, Timothy Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The practice of modern medicine is governed by evidence-based principles. Due to the plethora of medical literature, clinicians often rely on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines to summarize the evidence and provide best practices. Implementation of an evidence-based clinical approach can minimize variation in health care delivery and optimize the quality of patient care. Methods: This article reports a method for developing an "Evidence-based Review with Recommendations" using an online iterative process. The manuscript describes the following steps involved in this process: Clinical topic selection, Evidence-hased review assignment, Literature review and initial manuscript preparation, Iterative review process with author selection, and Manuscript finalization. Results: The goal of this article is to improve efficiency and increase the production of evidence-based reviews while maintaining the high quality and transparency associated with the rigorous methodology utilized for clinical guideline development. Conclusion: With the rise of evidence-based medicine, most medical and surgical specialties have an abundance of clinical topics which would benefit from a formal evidence-based review. Although clinical guideline development is an important methodology, the associated challenges limit development to only the absolute highest priority clinical topics. As outlined in this article, the online iterative approach to the development of an Evidence-based Review with Recommendations may improve productivity without compromising the quality associated with formal guideline development methodology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)431-437
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Forum of Allergy and Rhinology
Volume1
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Manuscripts
Guidelines
Surgical Specialties
Modern 1601-history
Quality of Health Care
Evidence-Based Medicine
Practice Guidelines
Patient Care
Medicine
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Development
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Iterative
  • Recommendations
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Development of an evidence-based review with recommendations using an online iterative process. / Rudmik, Luke; Smith, Timothy.

In: International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology, Vol. 1, No. 6, 11.2011, p. 431-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6777aa059e0e428a84e3efb47ce9dbfe,
title = "Development of an evidence-based review with recommendations using an online iterative process",
abstract = "Background: The practice of modern medicine is governed by evidence-based principles. Due to the plethora of medical literature, clinicians often rely on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines to summarize the evidence and provide best practices. Implementation of an evidence-based clinical approach can minimize variation in health care delivery and optimize the quality of patient care. Methods: This article reports a method for developing an {"}Evidence-based Review with Recommendations{"} using an online iterative process. The manuscript describes the following steps involved in this process: Clinical topic selection, Evidence-hased review assignment, Literature review and initial manuscript preparation, Iterative review process with author selection, and Manuscript finalization. Results: The goal of this article is to improve efficiency and increase the production of evidence-based reviews while maintaining the high quality and transparency associated with the rigorous methodology utilized for clinical guideline development. Conclusion: With the rise of evidence-based medicine, most medical and surgical specialties have an abundance of clinical topics which would benefit from a formal evidence-based review. Although clinical guideline development is an important methodology, the associated challenges limit development to only the absolute highest priority clinical topics. As outlined in this article, the online iterative approach to the development of an Evidence-based Review with Recommendations may improve productivity without compromising the quality associated with formal guideline development methodology.",
keywords = "Development, Evidence-based medicine, Iterative, Recommendations, Systematic review",
author = "Luke Rudmik and Timothy Smith",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/alr.20095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "431--437",
journal = "International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology",
issn = "2042-6976",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of an evidence-based review with recommendations using an online iterative process

AU - Rudmik, Luke

AU - Smith, Timothy

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Background: The practice of modern medicine is governed by evidence-based principles. Due to the plethora of medical literature, clinicians often rely on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines to summarize the evidence and provide best practices. Implementation of an evidence-based clinical approach can minimize variation in health care delivery and optimize the quality of patient care. Methods: This article reports a method for developing an "Evidence-based Review with Recommendations" using an online iterative process. The manuscript describes the following steps involved in this process: Clinical topic selection, Evidence-hased review assignment, Literature review and initial manuscript preparation, Iterative review process with author selection, and Manuscript finalization. Results: The goal of this article is to improve efficiency and increase the production of evidence-based reviews while maintaining the high quality and transparency associated with the rigorous methodology utilized for clinical guideline development. Conclusion: With the rise of evidence-based medicine, most medical and surgical specialties have an abundance of clinical topics which would benefit from a formal evidence-based review. Although clinical guideline development is an important methodology, the associated challenges limit development to only the absolute highest priority clinical topics. As outlined in this article, the online iterative approach to the development of an Evidence-based Review with Recommendations may improve productivity without compromising the quality associated with formal guideline development methodology.

AB - Background: The practice of modern medicine is governed by evidence-based principles. Due to the plethora of medical literature, clinicians often rely on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines to summarize the evidence and provide best practices. Implementation of an evidence-based clinical approach can minimize variation in health care delivery and optimize the quality of patient care. Methods: This article reports a method for developing an "Evidence-based Review with Recommendations" using an online iterative process. The manuscript describes the following steps involved in this process: Clinical topic selection, Evidence-hased review assignment, Literature review and initial manuscript preparation, Iterative review process with author selection, and Manuscript finalization. Results: The goal of this article is to improve efficiency and increase the production of evidence-based reviews while maintaining the high quality and transparency associated with the rigorous methodology utilized for clinical guideline development. Conclusion: With the rise of evidence-based medicine, most medical and surgical specialties have an abundance of clinical topics which would benefit from a formal evidence-based review. Although clinical guideline development is an important methodology, the associated challenges limit development to only the absolute highest priority clinical topics. As outlined in this article, the online iterative approach to the development of an Evidence-based Review with Recommendations may improve productivity without compromising the quality associated with formal guideline development methodology.

KW - Development

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Iterative

KW - Recommendations

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861399815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861399815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/alr.20095

DO - 10.1002/alr.20095

M3 - Article

C2 - 22144051

AN - SCOPUS:84861399815

VL - 1

SP - 431

EP - 437

JO - International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology

JF - International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology

SN - 2042-6976

IS - 6

ER -