Development of an Assessment to Examine Training of the Hospice Primary Caregiver

Eleanor L. DIbiasio, Joan Teno, Melissa A. Clark, Carol Spence, David Casarett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Key to high-quality care of dying hospice patients at home is whether the hospice provides adequate training so the caregiver can safely care for the patient. Objective: The study objective was to develop and validate a survey of hospice training for caregivers to ensure safe, high-quality care in the home setting. Design: Our survey design was cross-sectional. Bereaved respondents of individuals who died at home under the care of hospice were surveyed three to six months postdeath. Measurements: Items were developed based on advice of an expert panel, focus groups of hospice caregivers, and literature review, with 12 items developed for testing and examining 8 key processes of care. We examined the validity and reliability of the assessment using factor analysis, correlational analyses, and multivariable modeling. Results: Our sample consisted of 262 primary caregivers (mean age 62.4, 76.7% female, 58.8% non-Hispanic white). Six questions focused on providing the caregiver with information, while another six focused on the training that hospice provided. Based on model fit and Cronbach's alpha, we dropped the information items. The items that examined hospice training demonstrated a one-factor solution and a Cronbach's of 0.90. We examined correlations of the multi-item composite with overall rating of quality of care (0.53), overall distress (0.31), and whether the respondent would recommend this hospice to others (0.49). There were no significant sociodemographic correlates of concerns with training. Conclusions: Sufficient preliminary reliability and validity warrants further testing of this composite to examine the adequacy of training provided to family members to care safely for the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-645
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of palliative medicine
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospices
Caregivers
Quality of Health Care
Reproducibility of Results
Patient Care
Home Care Services
Focus Groups
Statistical Factor Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Development of an Assessment to Examine Training of the Hospice Primary Caregiver. / DIbiasio, Eleanor L.; Teno, Joan; Clark, Melissa A.; Spence, Carol; Casarett, David.

In: Journal of palliative medicine, Vol. 19, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 639-645.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DIbiasio, Eleanor L. ; Teno, Joan ; Clark, Melissa A. ; Spence, Carol ; Casarett, David. / Development of an Assessment to Examine Training of the Hospice Primary Caregiver. In: Journal of palliative medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 639-645.
@article{b5ccd636d35c44c49a7e3e9e093f1adb,
title = "Development of an Assessment to Examine Training of the Hospice Primary Caregiver",
abstract = "Background: Key to high-quality care of dying hospice patients at home is whether the hospice provides adequate training so the caregiver can safely care for the patient. Objective: The study objective was to develop and validate a survey of hospice training for caregivers to ensure safe, high-quality care in the home setting. Design: Our survey design was cross-sectional. Bereaved respondents of individuals who died at home under the care of hospice were surveyed three to six months postdeath. Measurements: Items were developed based on advice of an expert panel, focus groups of hospice caregivers, and literature review, with 12 items developed for testing and examining 8 key processes of care. We examined the validity and reliability of the assessment using factor analysis, correlational analyses, and multivariable modeling. Results: Our sample consisted of 262 primary caregivers (mean age 62.4, 76.7{\%} female, 58.8{\%} non-Hispanic white). Six questions focused on providing the caregiver with information, while another six focused on the training that hospice provided. Based on model fit and Cronbach's alpha, we dropped the information items. The items that examined hospice training demonstrated a one-factor solution and a Cronbach's of 0.90. We examined correlations of the multi-item composite with overall rating of quality of care (0.53), overall distress (0.31), and whether the respondent would recommend this hospice to others (0.49). There were no significant sociodemographic correlates of concerns with training. Conclusions: Sufficient preliminary reliability and validity warrants further testing of this composite to examine the adequacy of training provided to family members to care safely for the patient.",
author = "DIbiasio, {Eleanor L.} and Joan Teno and Clark, {Melissa A.} and Carol Spence and David Casarett",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.2015.0185",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "639--645",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of an Assessment to Examine Training of the Hospice Primary Caregiver

AU - DIbiasio, Eleanor L.

AU - Teno, Joan

AU - Clark, Melissa A.

AU - Spence, Carol

AU - Casarett, David

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Background: Key to high-quality care of dying hospice patients at home is whether the hospice provides adequate training so the caregiver can safely care for the patient. Objective: The study objective was to develop and validate a survey of hospice training for caregivers to ensure safe, high-quality care in the home setting. Design: Our survey design was cross-sectional. Bereaved respondents of individuals who died at home under the care of hospice were surveyed three to six months postdeath. Measurements: Items were developed based on advice of an expert panel, focus groups of hospice caregivers, and literature review, with 12 items developed for testing and examining 8 key processes of care. We examined the validity and reliability of the assessment using factor analysis, correlational analyses, and multivariable modeling. Results: Our sample consisted of 262 primary caregivers (mean age 62.4, 76.7% female, 58.8% non-Hispanic white). Six questions focused on providing the caregiver with information, while another six focused on the training that hospice provided. Based on model fit and Cronbach's alpha, we dropped the information items. The items that examined hospice training demonstrated a one-factor solution and a Cronbach's of 0.90. We examined correlations of the multi-item composite with overall rating of quality of care (0.53), overall distress (0.31), and whether the respondent would recommend this hospice to others (0.49). There were no significant sociodemographic correlates of concerns with training. Conclusions: Sufficient preliminary reliability and validity warrants further testing of this composite to examine the adequacy of training provided to family members to care safely for the patient.

AB - Background: Key to high-quality care of dying hospice patients at home is whether the hospice provides adequate training so the caregiver can safely care for the patient. Objective: The study objective was to develop and validate a survey of hospice training for caregivers to ensure safe, high-quality care in the home setting. Design: Our survey design was cross-sectional. Bereaved respondents of individuals who died at home under the care of hospice were surveyed three to six months postdeath. Measurements: Items were developed based on advice of an expert panel, focus groups of hospice caregivers, and literature review, with 12 items developed for testing and examining 8 key processes of care. We examined the validity and reliability of the assessment using factor analysis, correlational analyses, and multivariable modeling. Results: Our sample consisted of 262 primary caregivers (mean age 62.4, 76.7% female, 58.8% non-Hispanic white). Six questions focused on providing the caregiver with information, while another six focused on the training that hospice provided. Based on model fit and Cronbach's alpha, we dropped the information items. The items that examined hospice training demonstrated a one-factor solution and a Cronbach's of 0.90. We examined correlations of the multi-item composite with overall rating of quality of care (0.53), overall distress (0.31), and whether the respondent would recommend this hospice to others (0.49). There were no significant sociodemographic correlates of concerns with training. Conclusions: Sufficient preliminary reliability and validity warrants further testing of this composite to examine the adequacy of training provided to family members to care safely for the patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973879085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973879085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2015.0185

DO - 10.1089/jpm.2015.0185

M3 - Article

C2 - 27224450

AN - SCOPUS:84973879085

VL - 19

SP - 639

EP - 645

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 6

ER -