Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome

Jamie O. Edgin, Gina M. Mason, Melissa J. Allman, George T. Capone, Iser DeLeon, Cheryl Maslen, Roger H. Reeves, Stephanie L. Sherman, Lynn Nadel

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    103 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Neurocognitive assessment in individuals with intellectual disabilities requires a well-validated test battery. To meet this need, the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery (ACTB) has been developed specifically to assess the cognitive phenotype in Down syndrome (DS). The ACTB includes neuropsychological assessments chosen to 1) assess a range of skills, 2) be non-verbal so as to not confound the neuropsychological assessment with language demands, 3) have distributional properties appropriate for research studies to identify genetic modifiers of variation, 4) show sensitivity to within and between sample differences, 5) have specific correlates with brain function, and 6) be applicable to a wide age range and across contexts. The ACTB includes tests of general cognitive ability and prefrontal, hippocampal and cerebellar function. These tasks were drawn from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery (CANTAB) and other established paradigms. Alongside the cognitive testing battery we administered benchmark and parent-report assessments of cognition and behavior. Individuals with DS (n=74, ages 7-38 years) and mental age (MA) matched controls (n=50, ages 3-8 years) were tested across 3 sites. A subsample of these groups were used for between-group comparisons, including 55 individuals with DS and 36 mental age matched controls. The ACTB allows for low floor performance levels and participant loss. Floor effects were greater in younger children. Individuals with DS were impaired on a number ACTB tests in comparison to a MA-matched sample, with some areas of spared ability, particularly on tests requiring extensive motor coordination. Battery measures correlated with parent report of behavior and development. The ACTB provided consistent results across contexts, including home vs. lab visits, cross-site, and among individuals with a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds and differences in ethnicity. The ACTB will be useful in a range of outcome studies, including clinical trials and the identification of important genetic components of cognitive disability.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)149-164
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
    Volume2
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Down Syndrome
    Aptitude
    Benchmarking
    Intellectual Disability
    Cognition
    Language
    Economics
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Clinical Trials
    Phenotype
    Brain
    Research

    Keywords

    • Assessment
    • Clinical trials
    • Down syndrome
    • Genetics
    • Intellectual disabilities
    • Neuropsychology

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Clinical Neurology
    • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
    • Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

    Cite this

    Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome. / Edgin, Jamie O.; Mason, Gina M.; Allman, Melissa J.; Capone, George T.; DeLeon, Iser; Maslen, Cheryl; Reeves, Roger H.; Sherman, Stephanie L.; Nadel, Lynn.

    In: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2010, p. 149-164.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Edgin, JO, Mason, GM, Allman, MJ, Capone, GT, DeLeon, I, Maslen, C, Reeves, RH, Sherman, SL & Nadel, L 2010, 'Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome', Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11689-010-9054-3
    Edgin, Jamie O. ; Mason, Gina M. ; Allman, Melissa J. ; Capone, George T. ; DeLeon, Iser ; Maslen, Cheryl ; Reeves, Roger H. ; Sherman, Stephanie L. ; Nadel, Lynn. / Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome. In: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders. 2010 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 149-164.
    @article{457b5ef403714cba8ad9f3c9595b8263,
    title = "Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome",
    abstract = "Neurocognitive assessment in individuals with intellectual disabilities requires a well-validated test battery. To meet this need, the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery (ACTB) has been developed specifically to assess the cognitive phenotype in Down syndrome (DS). The ACTB includes neuropsychological assessments chosen to 1) assess a range of skills, 2) be non-verbal so as to not confound the neuropsychological assessment with language demands, 3) have distributional properties appropriate for research studies to identify genetic modifiers of variation, 4) show sensitivity to within and between sample differences, 5) have specific correlates with brain function, and 6) be applicable to a wide age range and across contexts. The ACTB includes tests of general cognitive ability and prefrontal, hippocampal and cerebellar function. These tasks were drawn from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery (CANTAB) and other established paradigms. Alongside the cognitive testing battery we administered benchmark and parent-report assessments of cognition and behavior. Individuals with DS (n=74, ages 7-38 years) and mental age (MA) matched controls (n=50, ages 3-8 years) were tested across 3 sites. A subsample of these groups were used for between-group comparisons, including 55 individuals with DS and 36 mental age matched controls. The ACTB allows for low floor performance levels and participant loss. Floor effects were greater in younger children. Individuals with DS were impaired on a number ACTB tests in comparison to a MA-matched sample, with some areas of spared ability, particularly on tests requiring extensive motor coordination. Battery measures correlated with parent report of behavior and development. The ACTB provided consistent results across contexts, including home vs. lab visits, cross-site, and among individuals with a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds and differences in ethnicity. The ACTB will be useful in a range of outcome studies, including clinical trials and the identification of important genetic components of cognitive disability.",
    keywords = "Assessment, Clinical trials, Down syndrome, Genetics, Intellectual disabilities, Neuropsychology",
    author = "Edgin, {Jamie O.} and Mason, {Gina M.} and Allman, {Melissa J.} and Capone, {George T.} and Iser DeLeon and Cheryl Maslen and Reeves, {Roger H.} and Sherman, {Stephanie L.} and Lynn Nadel",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1007/s11689-010-9054-3",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "2",
    pages = "149--164",
    journal = "Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders",
    issn = "1866-1947",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Development and validation of the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down syndrome

    AU - Edgin, Jamie O.

    AU - Mason, Gina M.

    AU - Allman, Melissa J.

    AU - Capone, George T.

    AU - DeLeon, Iser

    AU - Maslen, Cheryl

    AU - Reeves, Roger H.

    AU - Sherman, Stephanie L.

    AU - Nadel, Lynn

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - Neurocognitive assessment in individuals with intellectual disabilities requires a well-validated test battery. To meet this need, the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery (ACTB) has been developed specifically to assess the cognitive phenotype in Down syndrome (DS). The ACTB includes neuropsychological assessments chosen to 1) assess a range of skills, 2) be non-verbal so as to not confound the neuropsychological assessment with language demands, 3) have distributional properties appropriate for research studies to identify genetic modifiers of variation, 4) show sensitivity to within and between sample differences, 5) have specific correlates with brain function, and 6) be applicable to a wide age range and across contexts. The ACTB includes tests of general cognitive ability and prefrontal, hippocampal and cerebellar function. These tasks were drawn from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery (CANTAB) and other established paradigms. Alongside the cognitive testing battery we administered benchmark and parent-report assessments of cognition and behavior. Individuals with DS (n=74, ages 7-38 years) and mental age (MA) matched controls (n=50, ages 3-8 years) were tested across 3 sites. A subsample of these groups were used for between-group comparisons, including 55 individuals with DS and 36 mental age matched controls. The ACTB allows for low floor performance levels and participant loss. Floor effects were greater in younger children. Individuals with DS were impaired on a number ACTB tests in comparison to a MA-matched sample, with some areas of spared ability, particularly on tests requiring extensive motor coordination. Battery measures correlated with parent report of behavior and development. The ACTB provided consistent results across contexts, including home vs. lab visits, cross-site, and among individuals with a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds and differences in ethnicity. The ACTB will be useful in a range of outcome studies, including clinical trials and the identification of important genetic components of cognitive disability.

    AB - Neurocognitive assessment in individuals with intellectual disabilities requires a well-validated test battery. To meet this need, the Arizona Cognitive Test Battery (ACTB) has been developed specifically to assess the cognitive phenotype in Down syndrome (DS). The ACTB includes neuropsychological assessments chosen to 1) assess a range of skills, 2) be non-verbal so as to not confound the neuropsychological assessment with language demands, 3) have distributional properties appropriate for research studies to identify genetic modifiers of variation, 4) show sensitivity to within and between sample differences, 5) have specific correlates with brain function, and 6) be applicable to a wide age range and across contexts. The ACTB includes tests of general cognitive ability and prefrontal, hippocampal and cerebellar function. These tasks were drawn from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery (CANTAB) and other established paradigms. Alongside the cognitive testing battery we administered benchmark and parent-report assessments of cognition and behavior. Individuals with DS (n=74, ages 7-38 years) and mental age (MA) matched controls (n=50, ages 3-8 years) were tested across 3 sites. A subsample of these groups were used for between-group comparisons, including 55 individuals with DS and 36 mental age matched controls. The ACTB allows for low floor performance levels and participant loss. Floor effects were greater in younger children. Individuals with DS were impaired on a number ACTB tests in comparison to a MA-matched sample, with some areas of spared ability, particularly on tests requiring extensive motor coordination. Battery measures correlated with parent report of behavior and development. The ACTB provided consistent results across contexts, including home vs. lab visits, cross-site, and among individuals with a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds and differences in ethnicity. The ACTB will be useful in a range of outcome studies, including clinical trials and the identification of important genetic components of cognitive disability.

    KW - Assessment

    KW - Clinical trials

    KW - Down syndrome

    KW - Genetics

    KW - Intellectual disabilities

    KW - Neuropsychology

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955276385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955276385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11689-010-9054-3

    DO - 10.1007/s11689-010-9054-3

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:77955276385

    VL - 2

    SP - 149

    EP - 164

    JO - Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

    JF - Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders

    SN - 1866-1947

    IS - 3

    ER -