Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina questionnaire

A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease

John A. Spertus, Jennifer A. Winder, Timothy A. Dewhurst, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Janice Prodzinski, Mary McDonnell, Stephan D. Fihn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

810 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. This study sought to establish the validity, reproducibility and responsiveness of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, a 19-item self-administered questionnaire measuring five dimensions of coronary artery disease: physical limitation, anginal stability, anginal frequency, treatment satisfaction and disease perception. Background. Assessing the functional status of patients is becoming increasingly important in both clinical research and quality assurance programs. No current functional status measure quantifies all of the important domains affected by coronary artery disease. Methods. Cross-sectional or serial administration of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was carried out in four groups of patients: 70 undergoing exercise treadmil testing, 58 undergoing coronary angioplasty, 160 with initialty stable coronary artery disease and an additional 84 with coronary artery disease. Evidence of validity was sought by comparing the questionnaire's five scales with the duration of exercise treadmill tests, physicians diagnoses, nitroglycerin refills and other validated instruments. Reproducibility and responsiveness were assessed by comparing serial responses over a 3-month interval. Results. All five scales correlated significantly with other measures of diagnosis and patient function (r = 0.31 to 0.70, p ≤ 0.001). Questionnaire responses of patients with stable coronary artery disease did not change over 3 months. The questionnaire was sensitive to both dramatic clinical change, as seen after successful coronary angioplasty, and to more subtle-clinical change, as seen among outpatients with initially stable coronary artery disease. Conclusions. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument that measures five clinically important dimensions of health in patients with coronary artery disease. It is sensitive to clinical change and should be a valuable measure of outcome in cardiovascular research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-341
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Disease
Exercise Test
Angioplasty
Nitroglycerin
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research
Outpatients
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Exercise
Physicians
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina questionnaire : A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. / Spertus, John A.; Winder, Jennifer A.; Dewhurst, Timothy A.; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Prodzinski, Janice; McDonnell, Mary; Fihn, Stephan D.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1995, p. 333-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spertus, John A. ; Winder, Jennifer A. ; Dewhurst, Timothy A. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Prodzinski, Janice ; McDonnell, Mary ; Fihn, Stephan D. / Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina questionnaire : A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1995 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 333-341.
@article{9763b3bf20ef49b2afb4b0da40b15c97,
title = "Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease",
abstract = "Objectives. This study sought to establish the validity, reproducibility and responsiveness of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, a 19-item self-administered questionnaire measuring five dimensions of coronary artery disease: physical limitation, anginal stability, anginal frequency, treatment satisfaction and disease perception. Background. Assessing the functional status of patients is becoming increasingly important in both clinical research and quality assurance programs. No current functional status measure quantifies all of the important domains affected by coronary artery disease. Methods. Cross-sectional or serial administration of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was carried out in four groups of patients: 70 undergoing exercise treadmil testing, 58 undergoing coronary angioplasty, 160 with initialty stable coronary artery disease and an additional 84 with coronary artery disease. Evidence of validity was sought by comparing the questionnaire's five scales with the duration of exercise treadmill tests, physicians diagnoses, nitroglycerin refills and other validated instruments. Reproducibility and responsiveness were assessed by comparing serial responses over a 3-month interval. Results. All five scales correlated significantly with other measures of diagnosis and patient function (r = 0.31 to 0.70, p ≤ 0.001). Questionnaire responses of patients with stable coronary artery disease did not change over 3 months. The questionnaire was sensitive to both dramatic clinical change, as seen after successful coronary angioplasty, and to more subtle-clinical change, as seen among outpatients with initially stable coronary artery disease. Conclusions. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument that measures five clinically important dimensions of health in patients with coronary artery disease. It is sensitive to clinical change and should be a valuable measure of outcome in cardiovascular research.",
author = "Spertus, {John A.} and Winder, {Jennifer A.} and Dewhurst, {Timothy A.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Janice Prodzinski and Mary McDonnell and Fihn, {Stephan D.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "333--341",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina questionnaire

T2 - A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease

AU - Spertus, John A.

AU - Winder, Jennifer A.

AU - Dewhurst, Timothy A.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Prodzinski, Janice

AU - McDonnell, Mary

AU - Fihn, Stephan D.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Objectives. This study sought to establish the validity, reproducibility and responsiveness of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, a 19-item self-administered questionnaire measuring five dimensions of coronary artery disease: physical limitation, anginal stability, anginal frequency, treatment satisfaction and disease perception. Background. Assessing the functional status of patients is becoming increasingly important in both clinical research and quality assurance programs. No current functional status measure quantifies all of the important domains affected by coronary artery disease. Methods. Cross-sectional or serial administration of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was carried out in four groups of patients: 70 undergoing exercise treadmil testing, 58 undergoing coronary angioplasty, 160 with initialty stable coronary artery disease and an additional 84 with coronary artery disease. Evidence of validity was sought by comparing the questionnaire's five scales with the duration of exercise treadmill tests, physicians diagnoses, nitroglycerin refills and other validated instruments. Reproducibility and responsiveness were assessed by comparing serial responses over a 3-month interval. Results. All five scales correlated significantly with other measures of diagnosis and patient function (r = 0.31 to 0.70, p ≤ 0.001). Questionnaire responses of patients with stable coronary artery disease did not change over 3 months. The questionnaire was sensitive to both dramatic clinical change, as seen after successful coronary angioplasty, and to more subtle-clinical change, as seen among outpatients with initially stable coronary artery disease. Conclusions. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument that measures five clinically important dimensions of health in patients with coronary artery disease. It is sensitive to clinical change and should be a valuable measure of outcome in cardiovascular research.

AB - Objectives. This study sought to establish the validity, reproducibility and responsiveness of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, a 19-item self-administered questionnaire measuring five dimensions of coronary artery disease: physical limitation, anginal stability, anginal frequency, treatment satisfaction and disease perception. Background. Assessing the functional status of patients is becoming increasingly important in both clinical research and quality assurance programs. No current functional status measure quantifies all of the important domains affected by coronary artery disease. Methods. Cross-sectional or serial administration of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire was carried out in four groups of patients: 70 undergoing exercise treadmil testing, 58 undergoing coronary angioplasty, 160 with initialty stable coronary artery disease and an additional 84 with coronary artery disease. Evidence of validity was sought by comparing the questionnaire's five scales with the duration of exercise treadmill tests, physicians diagnoses, nitroglycerin refills and other validated instruments. Reproducibility and responsiveness were assessed by comparing serial responses over a 3-month interval. Results. All five scales correlated significantly with other measures of diagnosis and patient function (r = 0.31 to 0.70, p ≤ 0.001). Questionnaire responses of patients with stable coronary artery disease did not change over 3 months. The questionnaire was sensitive to both dramatic clinical change, as seen after successful coronary angioplasty, and to more subtle-clinical change, as seen among outpatients with initially stable coronary artery disease. Conclusions. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument that measures five clinically important dimensions of health in patients with coronary artery disease. It is sensitive to clinical change and should be a valuable measure of outcome in cardiovascular research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028877687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028877687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9

DO - 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 333

EP - 341

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 2

ER -