Development and evaluation of a six-day training program in supportive oncology research

William F. Pirl, Joseph A. Greer, Elyse Park, Steven A. Safren, Lauren Fields, Lisa Wood, Lara Traeger, Areej El-Jawahri, Bradley Zebrack, Jennifer S. Temel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Early career investigators have few opportunities for targeted training in supportive oncology research. To address this need, we developed, implemented, and evaluated an intensive, six-day workshop on methods in supportive oncology research for trainees and junior faculty across multiple disciplines. Method: A multidisciplinary team of supportive oncology researchers developed a workshop patterned after the clinical trials workshop offered jointly by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Association of Cancer Research. The curriculum included lectures and a mentored experience of writing a research protocol. Each year since 2015, the workshop has accepted and trained 36 early career investigators. Over the course of the workshop, participants present sections of their research protocols daily in small groups led by senior researchers, and have dedicated time to write and revise these sections. Primary outcomes for the workshop included the frequency of completed protocols by the end of the workshop, a pre- and posttest assessing participant knowledge, and follow-up surveys of the participants and their primary mentors. Result: Over three years, the workshop received 195 applications; 109 early career researchers were competitively selected to participate. All participants (109/109, 100%) completed writing a protocol by the end of their workshop. Participants and their primary mentors reported significant improvements in their research knowledge and skills. Each year, participants rated the workshop highly in terms of satisfaction, value, and likelihood of recommending it to a colleague. One year after the first workshop, most respondents (29/30, 96.7%) had either submitted their protocol or written at least one other protocol. Significance of results: We developed a workshop on research methods in supportive oncology. More early career investigators applied for the workshop than capacity, and the workshop was fully attended each year. Both the workshop participants and their primary mentors reported improvement in research skills and knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalPalliative and Supportive Care
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 28 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Education
Research
Research Personnel
Mentors
Curriculum
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • education
  • research
  • Supportive oncology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Pirl, W. F., Greer, J. A., Park, E., Safren, S. A., Fields, L., Wood, L., ... Temel, J. S. (Accepted/In press). Development and evaluation of a six-day training program in supportive oncology research. Palliative and Supportive Care, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517001092

Development and evaluation of a six-day training program in supportive oncology research. / Pirl, William F.; Greer, Joseph A.; Park, Elyse; Safren, Steven A.; Fields, Lauren; Wood, Lisa; Traeger, Lara; El-Jawahri, Areej; Zebrack, Bradley; Temel, Jennifer S.

In: Palliative and Supportive Care, 28.12.2017, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pirl, WF, Greer, JA, Park, E, Safren, SA, Fields, L, Wood, L, Traeger, L, El-Jawahri, A, Zebrack, B & Temel, JS 2017, 'Development and evaluation of a six-day training program in supportive oncology research', Palliative and Supportive Care, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517001092
Pirl, William F. ; Greer, Joseph A. ; Park, Elyse ; Safren, Steven A. ; Fields, Lauren ; Wood, Lisa ; Traeger, Lara ; El-Jawahri, Areej ; Zebrack, Bradley ; Temel, Jennifer S. / Development and evaluation of a six-day training program in supportive oncology research. In: Palliative and Supportive Care. 2017 ; pp. 1-6.
@article{15ca3c756adf4d138d7c37e40e68cb6c,
title = "Development and evaluation of a six-day training program in supportive oncology research",
abstract = "Objective: Early career investigators have few opportunities for targeted training in supportive oncology research. To address this need, we developed, implemented, and evaluated an intensive, six-day workshop on methods in supportive oncology research for trainees and junior faculty across multiple disciplines. Method: A multidisciplinary team of supportive oncology researchers developed a workshop patterned after the clinical trials workshop offered jointly by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Association of Cancer Research. The curriculum included lectures and a mentored experience of writing a research protocol. Each year since 2015, the workshop has accepted and trained 36 early career investigators. Over the course of the workshop, participants present sections of their research protocols daily in small groups led by senior researchers, and have dedicated time to write and revise these sections. Primary outcomes for the workshop included the frequency of completed protocols by the end of the workshop, a pre- and posttest assessing participant knowledge, and follow-up surveys of the participants and their primary mentors. Result: Over three years, the workshop received 195 applications; 109 early career researchers were competitively selected to participate. All participants (109/109, 100{\%}) completed writing a protocol by the end of their workshop. Participants and their primary mentors reported significant improvements in their research knowledge and skills. Each year, participants rated the workshop highly in terms of satisfaction, value, and likelihood of recommending it to a colleague. One year after the first workshop, most respondents (29/30, 96.7{\%}) had either submitted their protocol or written at least one other protocol. Significance of results: We developed a workshop on research methods in supportive oncology. More early career investigators applied for the workshop than capacity, and the workshop was fully attended each year. Both the workshop participants and their primary mentors reported improvement in research skills and knowledge.",
keywords = "education, research, Supportive oncology",
author = "Pirl, {William F.} and Greer, {Joseph A.} and Elyse Park and Safren, {Steven A.} and Lauren Fields and Lisa Wood and Lara Traeger and Areej El-Jawahri and Bradley Zebrack and Temel, {Jennifer S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1017/S1478951517001092",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Palliative and Supportive Care",
issn = "1478-9515",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and evaluation of a six-day training program in supportive oncology research

AU - Pirl, William F.

AU - Greer, Joseph A.

AU - Park, Elyse

AU - Safren, Steven A.

AU - Fields, Lauren

AU - Wood, Lisa

AU - Traeger, Lara

AU - El-Jawahri, Areej

AU - Zebrack, Bradley

AU - Temel, Jennifer S.

PY - 2017/12/28

Y1 - 2017/12/28

N2 - Objective: Early career investigators have few opportunities for targeted training in supportive oncology research. To address this need, we developed, implemented, and evaluated an intensive, six-day workshop on methods in supportive oncology research for trainees and junior faculty across multiple disciplines. Method: A multidisciplinary team of supportive oncology researchers developed a workshop patterned after the clinical trials workshop offered jointly by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Association of Cancer Research. The curriculum included lectures and a mentored experience of writing a research protocol. Each year since 2015, the workshop has accepted and trained 36 early career investigators. Over the course of the workshop, participants present sections of their research protocols daily in small groups led by senior researchers, and have dedicated time to write and revise these sections. Primary outcomes for the workshop included the frequency of completed protocols by the end of the workshop, a pre- and posttest assessing participant knowledge, and follow-up surveys of the participants and their primary mentors. Result: Over three years, the workshop received 195 applications; 109 early career researchers were competitively selected to participate. All participants (109/109, 100%) completed writing a protocol by the end of their workshop. Participants and their primary mentors reported significant improvements in their research knowledge and skills. Each year, participants rated the workshop highly in terms of satisfaction, value, and likelihood of recommending it to a colleague. One year after the first workshop, most respondents (29/30, 96.7%) had either submitted their protocol or written at least one other protocol. Significance of results: We developed a workshop on research methods in supportive oncology. More early career investigators applied for the workshop than capacity, and the workshop was fully attended each year. Both the workshop participants and their primary mentors reported improvement in research skills and knowledge.

AB - Objective: Early career investigators have few opportunities for targeted training in supportive oncology research. To address this need, we developed, implemented, and evaluated an intensive, six-day workshop on methods in supportive oncology research for trainees and junior faculty across multiple disciplines. Method: A multidisciplinary team of supportive oncology researchers developed a workshop patterned after the clinical trials workshop offered jointly by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Association of Cancer Research. The curriculum included lectures and a mentored experience of writing a research protocol. Each year since 2015, the workshop has accepted and trained 36 early career investigators. Over the course of the workshop, participants present sections of their research protocols daily in small groups led by senior researchers, and have dedicated time to write and revise these sections. Primary outcomes for the workshop included the frequency of completed protocols by the end of the workshop, a pre- and posttest assessing participant knowledge, and follow-up surveys of the participants and their primary mentors. Result: Over three years, the workshop received 195 applications; 109 early career researchers were competitively selected to participate. All participants (109/109, 100%) completed writing a protocol by the end of their workshop. Participants and their primary mentors reported significant improvements in their research knowledge and skills. Each year, participants rated the workshop highly in terms of satisfaction, value, and likelihood of recommending it to a colleague. One year after the first workshop, most respondents (29/30, 96.7%) had either submitted their protocol or written at least one other protocol. Significance of results: We developed a workshop on research methods in supportive oncology. More early career investigators applied for the workshop than capacity, and the workshop was fully attended each year. Both the workshop participants and their primary mentors reported improvement in research skills and knowledge.

KW - education

KW - research

KW - Supportive oncology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042237741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042237741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1478951517001092

DO - 10.1017/S1478951517001092

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Palliative and Supportive Care

JF - Palliative and Supportive Care

SN - 1478-9515

ER -