Developing Research Criteria to Define Medical Necessity in Emergency Medical Services

David C. Cone, Terri Schmidt, N. Clay Mann, Lawrence Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

"The Neely Conference: Developing Research Criteria to Define Medical Necessity in EMS" convened emergency medical services (EMS) physicians, researchers, administrators, providers, and federal agency representatives to begin the development of a set of uniform triage criteria and outcome measures that could be used to study and evaluate medical necessity among EMS patients. These standardized criteria might be used in research studies examining EMS dispatch and response (e.g., dispatch triage protocols, alternative response configurations), and EMS treatment and transport (e.g., field triage protocols, alternative care destinations). The conference process included review and analysis of the literature, expert judgment, and consensus building. There was general agreement on the following: 1. Any dispatch triage or field triage system that is developed must be designed to offer patients alternatives to EMS, not to refuse care to patients. 2. It is theoretically possible to develop a set of clinical criteria for need. Some groups of patients will clearly need a traditional EMS response and other groups will not, but this has yet to be defined. 3. In addition to clinical criteria, certain social and other non-clinical criteria such as pain or potential abuse may be used to justify a response. 4. Communication barriers, patient age, special needs, and other conditions complicate patient assessment but should not exclude patients from consideration for alternate triage or transport. 5. These research questions are important, and standard sets of outcome measures are needed so that different studies and innovative programs can be compared.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-125
Number of pages10
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Triage
Research
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Communication Barriers
Administrative Personnel
Consensus
Patient Care
Research Personnel
Physicians
Pain

Keywords

  • Consensus
  • Medical necessity
  • Neely Conference
  • Research criteria

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Developing Research Criteria to Define Medical Necessity in Emergency Medical Services. / Cone, David C.; Schmidt, Terri; Mann, N. Clay; Brown, Lawrence.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 8, No. 2, 04.2004, p. 116-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cone, David C. ; Schmidt, Terri ; Mann, N. Clay ; Brown, Lawrence. / Developing Research Criteria to Define Medical Necessity in Emergency Medical Services. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2004 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 116-125.
@article{b2ec57ec62e84934a011331a2cd33515,
title = "Developing Research Criteria to Define Medical Necessity in Emergency Medical Services",
abstract = "{"}The Neely Conference: Developing Research Criteria to Define Medical Necessity in EMS{"} convened emergency medical services (EMS) physicians, researchers, administrators, providers, and federal agency representatives to begin the development of a set of uniform triage criteria and outcome measures that could be used to study and evaluate medical necessity among EMS patients. These standardized criteria might be used in research studies examining EMS dispatch and response (e.g., dispatch triage protocols, alternative response configurations), and EMS treatment and transport (e.g., field triage protocols, alternative care destinations). The conference process included review and analysis of the literature, expert judgment, and consensus building. There was general agreement on the following: 1. Any dispatch triage or field triage system that is developed must be designed to offer patients alternatives to EMS, not to refuse care to patients. 2. It is theoretically possible to develop a set of clinical criteria for need. Some groups of patients will clearly need a traditional EMS response and other groups will not, but this has yet to be defined. 3. In addition to clinical criteria, certain social and other non-clinical criteria such as pain or potential abuse may be used to justify a response. 4. Communication barriers, patient age, special needs, and other conditions complicate patient assessment but should not exclude patients from consideration for alternate triage or transport. 5. These research questions are important, and standard sets of outcome measures are needed so that different studies and innovative programs can be compared.",
keywords = "Consensus, Medical necessity, Neely Conference, Research criteria",
author = "Cone, {David C.} and Terri Schmidt and Mann, {N. Clay} and Lawrence Brown",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "116--125",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing Research Criteria to Define Medical Necessity in Emergency Medical Services

AU - Cone, David C.

AU - Schmidt, Terri

AU - Mann, N. Clay

AU - Brown, Lawrence

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - "The Neely Conference: Developing Research Criteria to Define Medical Necessity in EMS" convened emergency medical services (EMS) physicians, researchers, administrators, providers, and federal agency representatives to begin the development of a set of uniform triage criteria and outcome measures that could be used to study and evaluate medical necessity among EMS patients. These standardized criteria might be used in research studies examining EMS dispatch and response (e.g., dispatch triage protocols, alternative response configurations), and EMS treatment and transport (e.g., field triage protocols, alternative care destinations). The conference process included review and analysis of the literature, expert judgment, and consensus building. There was general agreement on the following: 1. Any dispatch triage or field triage system that is developed must be designed to offer patients alternatives to EMS, not to refuse care to patients. 2. It is theoretically possible to develop a set of clinical criteria for need. Some groups of patients will clearly need a traditional EMS response and other groups will not, but this has yet to be defined. 3. In addition to clinical criteria, certain social and other non-clinical criteria such as pain or potential abuse may be used to justify a response. 4. Communication barriers, patient age, special needs, and other conditions complicate patient assessment but should not exclude patients from consideration for alternate triage or transport. 5. These research questions are important, and standard sets of outcome measures are needed so that different studies and innovative programs can be compared.

AB - "The Neely Conference: Developing Research Criteria to Define Medical Necessity in EMS" convened emergency medical services (EMS) physicians, researchers, administrators, providers, and federal agency representatives to begin the development of a set of uniform triage criteria and outcome measures that could be used to study and evaluate medical necessity among EMS patients. These standardized criteria might be used in research studies examining EMS dispatch and response (e.g., dispatch triage protocols, alternative response configurations), and EMS treatment and transport (e.g., field triage protocols, alternative care destinations). The conference process included review and analysis of the literature, expert judgment, and consensus building. There was general agreement on the following: 1. Any dispatch triage or field triage system that is developed must be designed to offer patients alternatives to EMS, not to refuse care to patients. 2. It is theoretically possible to develop a set of clinical criteria for need. Some groups of patients will clearly need a traditional EMS response and other groups will not, but this has yet to be defined. 3. In addition to clinical criteria, certain social and other non-clinical criteria such as pain or potential abuse may be used to justify a response. 4. Communication barriers, patient age, special needs, and other conditions complicate patient assessment but should not exclude patients from consideration for alternate triage or transport. 5. These research questions are important, and standard sets of outcome measures are needed so that different studies and innovative programs can be compared.

KW - Consensus

KW - Medical necessity

KW - Neely Conference

KW - Research criteria

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16544369352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16544369352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 116

EP - 125

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 2

ER -