TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan
T2 - Results from the long-term outcomes research gap Delphi survey
AU - Herrera-Escobar, Juan P.
AU - Reidy, Emma
AU - Phuong, Jimmy
AU - Brasel, Karen J.
AU - Cuschieri, Joseph
AU - Fallat, Mary
AU - Potter, Benjamin K.
AU - Price, Michelle A.
AU - Bulger, Eileen M.
AU - Haider, Adil H.
N1 - Funding Information:
Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the Institute of Translational Health Sciences. Research Electronic Data Capture is a secure, web-based application designed to support data capture for research studies, providing (1) an intuitive interface for validated data entry, (2) audit trails for tracking data manipulation and export procedures, (3) automated export procedures for seamless data downloads to common statistical packages, and (4) procedures for importing data from external sources. Research Electronic Data Capture at Institute of Translational Health Sciences is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number UL1 TR002319.
Funding Information:
This work is supported by the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command under contract number W81XWH-18-C-0179. DISCLOSURE
Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes. METHODS Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions. CONCLUSION This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.
AB - BACKGROUND In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes. METHODS Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions. CONCLUSION This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.
KW - Delphi survey
KW - Long-term outcomes
KW - injury recovery
KW - national trauma research action plan
KW - quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142403716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142403716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000003747
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000003747
M3 - Article
C2 - 35972140
AN - SCOPUS:85142403716
VL - 93
SP - 854
EP - 862
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
SN - 2163-0755
IS - 6
ER -