Detecting short-term change and variation in health-related quality of life: Within- and between-person factor structure of the SF-36 health survey

Amanda Kelly, Jonathan Rush, Eric Shafonsky, Allen Hayashi, Kristine Votova, Christine Hall, Andrea M. Piccinin, Jens Weber, Philippe Rast, Scott Hofer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A major goal of much aging-related research and geriatric medicine is to identify early changes in health and functioning before serious limitations develop. To this end, regular collection of patient-reported outcome measure (PROMs) in a clinical setting may be useful to identify and monitor these changes. However, existing PROMs were not designed for repeated administration and are more commonly used as one-time screening tools; as such, their ability to detect variation and measurement properties when administered repeatedly remain unknown. In this study we evaluated the potential of the RAND SF-36 Health Survey as a repeated-use PROM by examining its measurement properties when modified for administration over multiple occasions. Methods: To distinguish between-person (i.e., average) from within-person (i.e., occasion) levels, the SF-36 Health Survey was completed by a sample of older adults (N = 122, M age = 66.28 years) daily for seven consecutive days. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to investigate the factor structure at both levels for two- and eight-factor solutions. Results: Multilevel CFA models revealed that the correlated eight-factor solution provided better model fit than the two-factor solution at both the between-person and within-person levels. Overall model fit for the SF-36 Health Survey administered daily was not substantially different from standard survey administration, though both were below optimal levels as reported in the literature. However, individual subscales did demonstrate good reliability. Conclusions: Many of the subscales of the modified SF-36 for repeated daily assessment were found to be sufficiently reliable for use in repeated measurement designs incorporating PROMs, though the overall scale may not be optimal. We encourage future work to investigate the utility of the subscales in specific contexts, as well as the measurement properties of other existing PROMs when administered in a repeated measures design. The development and integration of new measures for this purpose may ultimately be necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number199
JournalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 21 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Surveys
Quality of Life
Statistical Factor Analysis
Geriatrics
Medicine
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Health-related quality of life
  • Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • SF-36 health survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Detecting short-term change and variation in health-related quality of life : Within- and between-person factor structure of the SF-36 health survey. / Kelly, Amanda; Rush, Jonathan; Shafonsky, Eric; Hayashi, Allen; Votova, Kristine; Hall, Christine; Piccinin, Andrea M.; Weber, Jens; Rast, Philippe; Hofer, Scott.

In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol. 13, No. 1, 199, 21.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kelly, Amanda ; Rush, Jonathan ; Shafonsky, Eric ; Hayashi, Allen ; Votova, Kristine ; Hall, Christine ; Piccinin, Andrea M. ; Weber, Jens ; Rast, Philippe ; Hofer, Scott. / Detecting short-term change and variation in health-related quality of life : Within- and between-person factor structure of the SF-36 health survey. In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 1.
@article{85cd6c82016f45d89367c13190040cef,
title = "Detecting short-term change and variation in health-related quality of life: Within- and between-person factor structure of the SF-36 health survey",
abstract = "Background: A major goal of much aging-related research and geriatric medicine is to identify early changes in health and functioning before serious limitations develop. To this end, regular collection of patient-reported outcome measure (PROMs) in a clinical setting may be useful to identify and monitor these changes. However, existing PROMs were not designed for repeated administration and are more commonly used as one-time screening tools; as such, their ability to detect variation and measurement properties when administered repeatedly remain unknown. In this study we evaluated the potential of the RAND SF-36 Health Survey as a repeated-use PROM by examining its measurement properties when modified for administration over multiple occasions. Methods: To distinguish between-person (i.e., average) from within-person (i.e., occasion) levels, the SF-36 Health Survey was completed by a sample of older adults (N = 122, M age = 66.28 years) daily for seven consecutive days. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to investigate the factor structure at both levels for two- and eight-factor solutions. Results: Multilevel CFA models revealed that the correlated eight-factor solution provided better model fit than the two-factor solution at both the between-person and within-person levels. Overall model fit for the SF-36 Health Survey administered daily was not substantially different from standard survey administration, though both were below optimal levels as reported in the literature. However, individual subscales did demonstrate good reliability. Conclusions: Many of the subscales of the modified SF-36 for repeated daily assessment were found to be sufficiently reliable for use in repeated measurement designs incorporating PROMs, though the overall scale may not be optimal. We encourage future work to investigate the utility of the subscales in specific contexts, as well as the measurement properties of other existing PROMs when administered in a repeated measures design. The development and integration of new measures for this purpose may ultimately be necessary.",
keywords = "Health-related quality of life, Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis, Patient-reported outcomes, SF-36 health survey",
author = "Amanda Kelly and Jonathan Rush and Eric Shafonsky and Allen Hayashi and Kristine Votova and Christine Hall and Piccinin, {Andrea M.} and Jens Weber and Philippe Rast and Scott Hofer",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/s12955-015-0395-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Health and Quality of Life Outcomes",
issn = "1477-7525",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting short-term change and variation in health-related quality of life

T2 - Within- and between-person factor structure of the SF-36 health survey

AU - Kelly, Amanda

AU - Rush, Jonathan

AU - Shafonsky, Eric

AU - Hayashi, Allen

AU - Votova, Kristine

AU - Hall, Christine

AU - Piccinin, Andrea M.

AU - Weber, Jens

AU - Rast, Philippe

AU - Hofer, Scott

PY - 2015/12/21

Y1 - 2015/12/21

N2 - Background: A major goal of much aging-related research and geriatric medicine is to identify early changes in health and functioning before serious limitations develop. To this end, regular collection of patient-reported outcome measure (PROMs) in a clinical setting may be useful to identify and monitor these changes. However, existing PROMs were not designed for repeated administration and are more commonly used as one-time screening tools; as such, their ability to detect variation and measurement properties when administered repeatedly remain unknown. In this study we evaluated the potential of the RAND SF-36 Health Survey as a repeated-use PROM by examining its measurement properties when modified for administration over multiple occasions. Methods: To distinguish between-person (i.e., average) from within-person (i.e., occasion) levels, the SF-36 Health Survey was completed by a sample of older adults (N = 122, M age = 66.28 years) daily for seven consecutive days. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to investigate the factor structure at both levels for two- and eight-factor solutions. Results: Multilevel CFA models revealed that the correlated eight-factor solution provided better model fit than the two-factor solution at both the between-person and within-person levels. Overall model fit for the SF-36 Health Survey administered daily was not substantially different from standard survey administration, though both were below optimal levels as reported in the literature. However, individual subscales did demonstrate good reliability. Conclusions: Many of the subscales of the modified SF-36 for repeated daily assessment were found to be sufficiently reliable for use in repeated measurement designs incorporating PROMs, though the overall scale may not be optimal. We encourage future work to investigate the utility of the subscales in specific contexts, as well as the measurement properties of other existing PROMs when administered in a repeated measures design. The development and integration of new measures for this purpose may ultimately be necessary.

AB - Background: A major goal of much aging-related research and geriatric medicine is to identify early changes in health and functioning before serious limitations develop. To this end, regular collection of patient-reported outcome measure (PROMs) in a clinical setting may be useful to identify and monitor these changes. However, existing PROMs were not designed for repeated administration and are more commonly used as one-time screening tools; as such, their ability to detect variation and measurement properties when administered repeatedly remain unknown. In this study we evaluated the potential of the RAND SF-36 Health Survey as a repeated-use PROM by examining its measurement properties when modified for administration over multiple occasions. Methods: To distinguish between-person (i.e., average) from within-person (i.e., occasion) levels, the SF-36 Health Survey was completed by a sample of older adults (N = 122, M age = 66.28 years) daily for seven consecutive days. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to investigate the factor structure at both levels for two- and eight-factor solutions. Results: Multilevel CFA models revealed that the correlated eight-factor solution provided better model fit than the two-factor solution at both the between-person and within-person levels. Overall model fit for the SF-36 Health Survey administered daily was not substantially different from standard survey administration, though both were below optimal levels as reported in the literature. However, individual subscales did demonstrate good reliability. Conclusions: Many of the subscales of the modified SF-36 for repeated daily assessment were found to be sufficiently reliable for use in repeated measurement designs incorporating PROMs, though the overall scale may not be optimal. We encourage future work to investigate the utility of the subscales in specific contexts, as well as the measurement properties of other existing PROMs when administered in a repeated measures design. The development and integration of new measures for this purpose may ultimately be necessary.

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Patient-reported outcomes

KW - SF-36 health survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954388613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954388613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12955-015-0395-1

DO - 10.1186/s12955-015-0395-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 26690802

AN - SCOPUS:84954388613

VL - 13

JO - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

JF - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

SN - 1477-7525

IS - 1

M1 - 199

ER -