Designing Clinical Space for the Delivery of Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care

Rose Gunn, Melinda Davis, Jennifer Hall, John Heintzman, John Muench, Brianna Smeds, Benjamin F. Miller, William L. Miller, Emma Gilchrist, Shandra Brown Levey, Jacqueline Brown, Pam Wise Romero, Deborah Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study sought to describe features of the physical space in which practices integrating primary care and behavioral health care work and to identify the arrangements that enable integration of care.

METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 19 diverse practices located across the United States. Practice-level data included field notes from 2-4-day site visits, transcripts from semistructured interviews with clinicians and clinical staff, online implementation diary posts, and facility photographs. A multidisciplinary team used a 4-stage, systematic approach to analyze data and identify how physical layout enabled the work of integrated care teams.

RESULTS: Two dominant spatial layouts emerged across practices: type-1 layouts were characterized by having primary care clinicians (PCCs) and behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) located in separate work areas, and type-2 layouts had BHCs and PCCs sharing work space. We describe these layouts and the influence they have on situational awareness, interprofessional "bumpability," and opportunities for on-the-fly communication. We observed BHCs and PCCs engaging in more face-to-face methods for coordinating integrated care for patients in type 2 layouts (41.5% of observed encounters vs 11.7%; P < .05). We show that practices needed to strike a balance between professional proximity and private work areas to accomplish job tasks. Private workspace was needed for focused work, to see patients, and for consults between clinicians and clinical staff. We describe the ways practices modified and built new space and provide 2 recommended layouts for practices integrating care based on study findings.

CONCLUSION: Physical layout and positioning of professionals' workspace is an important consideration in practices implementing integrated care. Clinicians, researchers, and health-care administrators are encouraged to consider the role of professional proximity and private working space when creating new facilities or redesigning existing space to foster delivery of integrated behavioral health and primary care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S52-S62
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Volume28
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Integrated Delivery of Health Care
Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Professional Role
Administrative Personnel
Observational Studies
Patient Care
Communication
Research Personnel
Interviews
Health

Keywords

  • Behavioral Medicine
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Integrated
  • Medical Office Buildings
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Designing Clinical Space for the Delivery of Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care. / Gunn, Rose; Davis, Melinda; Hall, Jennifer; Heintzman, John; Muench, John; Smeds, Brianna; Miller, Benjamin F.; Miller, William L.; Gilchrist, Emma; Brown Levey, Shandra; Brown, Jacqueline; Wise Romero, Pam; Cohen, Deborah.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, Vol. 28, 01.09.2015, p. S52-S62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gunn, Rose ; Davis, Melinda ; Hall, Jennifer ; Heintzman, John ; Muench, John ; Smeds, Brianna ; Miller, Benjamin F. ; Miller, William L. ; Gilchrist, Emma ; Brown Levey, Shandra ; Brown, Jacqueline ; Wise Romero, Pam ; Cohen, Deborah. / Designing Clinical Space for the Delivery of Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. 2015 ; Vol. 28. pp. S52-S62.
@article{6bf3e3e4d0ab405d97369a963a61accb,
title = "Designing Clinical Space for the Delivery of Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care",
abstract = "PURPOSE: This study sought to describe features of the physical space in which practices integrating primary care and behavioral health care work and to identify the arrangements that enable integration of care.METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 19 diverse practices located across the United States. Practice-level data included field notes from 2-4-day site visits, transcripts from semistructured interviews with clinicians and clinical staff, online implementation diary posts, and facility photographs. A multidisciplinary team used a 4-stage, systematic approach to analyze data and identify how physical layout enabled the work of integrated care teams.RESULTS: Two dominant spatial layouts emerged across practices: type-1 layouts were characterized by having primary care clinicians (PCCs) and behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) located in separate work areas, and type-2 layouts had BHCs and PCCs sharing work space. We describe these layouts and the influence they have on situational awareness, interprofessional {"}bumpability,{"} and opportunities for on-the-fly communication. We observed BHCs and PCCs engaging in more face-to-face methods for coordinating integrated care for patients in type 2 layouts (41.5{\%} of observed encounters vs 11.7{\%}; P < .05). We show that practices needed to strike a balance between professional proximity and private work areas to accomplish job tasks. Private workspace was needed for focused work, to see patients, and for consults between clinicians and clinical staff. We describe the ways practices modified and built new space and provide 2 recommended layouts for practices integrating care based on study findings.CONCLUSION: Physical layout and positioning of professionals' workspace is an important consideration in practices implementing integrated care. Clinicians, researchers, and health-care administrators are encouraged to consider the role of professional proximity and private working space when creating new facilities or redesigning existing space to foster delivery of integrated behavioral health and primary care.",
keywords = "Behavioral Medicine, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Medical Office Buildings, Primary Health Care, Qualitative Research",
author = "Rose Gunn and Melinda Davis and Jennifer Hall and John Heintzman and John Muench and Brianna Smeds and Miller, {Benjamin F.} and Miller, {William L.} and Emma Gilchrist and {Brown Levey}, Shandra and Jacqueline Brown and {Wise Romero}, Pam and Deborah Cohen",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "S52--S62",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Designing Clinical Space for the Delivery of Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care

AU - Gunn, Rose

AU - Davis, Melinda

AU - Hall, Jennifer

AU - Heintzman, John

AU - Muench, John

AU - Smeds, Brianna

AU - Miller, Benjamin F.

AU - Miller, William L.

AU - Gilchrist, Emma

AU - Brown Levey, Shandra

AU - Brown, Jacqueline

AU - Wise Romero, Pam

AU - Cohen, Deborah

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - PURPOSE: This study sought to describe features of the physical space in which practices integrating primary care and behavioral health care work and to identify the arrangements that enable integration of care.METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 19 diverse practices located across the United States. Practice-level data included field notes from 2-4-day site visits, transcripts from semistructured interviews with clinicians and clinical staff, online implementation diary posts, and facility photographs. A multidisciplinary team used a 4-stage, systematic approach to analyze data and identify how physical layout enabled the work of integrated care teams.RESULTS: Two dominant spatial layouts emerged across practices: type-1 layouts were characterized by having primary care clinicians (PCCs) and behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) located in separate work areas, and type-2 layouts had BHCs and PCCs sharing work space. We describe these layouts and the influence they have on situational awareness, interprofessional "bumpability," and opportunities for on-the-fly communication. We observed BHCs and PCCs engaging in more face-to-face methods for coordinating integrated care for patients in type 2 layouts (41.5% of observed encounters vs 11.7%; P < .05). We show that practices needed to strike a balance between professional proximity and private work areas to accomplish job tasks. Private workspace was needed for focused work, to see patients, and for consults between clinicians and clinical staff. We describe the ways practices modified and built new space and provide 2 recommended layouts for practices integrating care based on study findings.CONCLUSION: Physical layout and positioning of professionals' workspace is an important consideration in practices implementing integrated care. Clinicians, researchers, and health-care administrators are encouraged to consider the role of professional proximity and private working space when creating new facilities or redesigning existing space to foster delivery of integrated behavioral health and primary care.

AB - PURPOSE: This study sought to describe features of the physical space in which practices integrating primary care and behavioral health care work and to identify the arrangements that enable integration of care.METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 19 diverse practices located across the United States. Practice-level data included field notes from 2-4-day site visits, transcripts from semistructured interviews with clinicians and clinical staff, online implementation diary posts, and facility photographs. A multidisciplinary team used a 4-stage, systematic approach to analyze data and identify how physical layout enabled the work of integrated care teams.RESULTS: Two dominant spatial layouts emerged across practices: type-1 layouts were characterized by having primary care clinicians (PCCs) and behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) located in separate work areas, and type-2 layouts had BHCs and PCCs sharing work space. We describe these layouts and the influence they have on situational awareness, interprofessional "bumpability," and opportunities for on-the-fly communication. We observed BHCs and PCCs engaging in more face-to-face methods for coordinating integrated care for patients in type 2 layouts (41.5% of observed encounters vs 11.7%; P < .05). We show that practices needed to strike a balance between professional proximity and private work areas to accomplish job tasks. Private workspace was needed for focused work, to see patients, and for consults between clinicians and clinical staff. We describe the ways practices modified and built new space and provide 2 recommended layouts for practices integrating care based on study findings.CONCLUSION: Physical layout and positioning of professionals' workspace is an important consideration in practices implementing integrated care. Clinicians, researchers, and health-care administrators are encouraged to consider the role of professional proximity and private working space when creating new facilities or redesigning existing space to foster delivery of integrated behavioral health and primary care.

KW - Behavioral Medicine

KW - Delivery of Health Care

KW - Integrated

KW - Medical Office Buildings

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Qualitative Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016626394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016626394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150053

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150053

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - S52-S62

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

ER -