Description and validation of a noninvasive placebo acupuncture procedure

Karen J. Sherman, Charissa J. Hogeboom, Daniel C. Cherkin, Richard (Rick) Deyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a simulated acupuncture technique for use in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain. Setting: The clinic of an accredited acupuncture college in Seattle, Washington. Subjects: Acupuncture-naïve enrollees of Group Health Cooperative who had visited their primary care provider with a complaint of back pain that persisted for at least 3 months. Experimental design: In the first experiment, subjects received six insertions of real needles and six pokes with a toothpick in a guidetube in a two-period crossover design. In the second experiment, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either a complete treatment with real acupuncture needles or a simulated treatment using a toothpick in a guidetube. Outcomes: In the first experiment, we compared subjects' perceptions about which implement was used for each "insertion" while in the second, we compared the perceptions (e.g., acupuncturist's warmth and caring, the reasonableness of acupuncture as a treatment) and pain relief of those who received an acupuncture treatment using needles to those receiving simulated acupuncture. Results: In the first experiment, the toothpick insertions were perceived as slightly more like real needling than the real needling (mean ratings of 2.8 and 2.1, respectively; p = 0.08). In the second experiment, 52% percent of those receiving the simulated needling versus 65% of those receiving real acupuncture believed they were "definitely" or "probably" receiving real acupuncture (p = 0.33). Perceptions of acupuncture, as measured by a credibility questionnaire, were similar in the two groups. Those receiving real acupuncture were more likely to report immediate pain relief, and this was the factor most predictive of the subject's belief about which treatment they had received (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The simulated acupuncture procedure evaluated in this study represents a reasonable control treatment for acupuncture-naïve individuals in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume8
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Acupuncture
Placebos
Acupuncture Therapy
Needles
Low Back Pain
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pain
Therapeutics
Back Pain
Cross-Over Studies
Primary Health Care
Research Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Complementary and alternative medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Description and validation of a noninvasive placebo acupuncture procedure. / Sherman, Karen J.; Hogeboom, Charissa J.; Cherkin, Daniel C.; Deyo, Richard (Rick).

In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, p. 11-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sherman, Karen J. ; Hogeboom, Charissa J. ; Cherkin, Daniel C. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick). / Description and validation of a noninvasive placebo acupuncture procedure. In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 11-19.
@article{9c3b6eef248a4ba1a626cc41237efaa1,
title = "Description and validation of a noninvasive placebo acupuncture procedure",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate a simulated acupuncture technique for use in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain. Setting: The clinic of an accredited acupuncture college in Seattle, Washington. Subjects: Acupuncture-na{\"i}ve enrollees of Group Health Cooperative who had visited their primary care provider with a complaint of back pain that persisted for at least 3 months. Experimental design: In the first experiment, subjects received six insertions of real needles and six pokes with a toothpick in a guidetube in a two-period crossover design. In the second experiment, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either a complete treatment with real acupuncture needles or a simulated treatment using a toothpick in a guidetube. Outcomes: In the first experiment, we compared subjects' perceptions about which implement was used for each {"}insertion{"} while in the second, we compared the perceptions (e.g., acupuncturist's warmth and caring, the reasonableness of acupuncture as a treatment) and pain relief of those who received an acupuncture treatment using needles to those receiving simulated acupuncture. Results: In the first experiment, the toothpick insertions were perceived as slightly more like real needling than the real needling (mean ratings of 2.8 and 2.1, respectively; p = 0.08). In the second experiment, 52{\%} percent of those receiving the simulated needling versus 65{\%} of those receiving real acupuncture believed they were {"}definitely{"} or {"}probably{"} receiving real acupuncture (p = 0.33). Perceptions of acupuncture, as measured by a credibility questionnaire, were similar in the two groups. Those receiving real acupuncture were more likely to report immediate pain relief, and this was the factor most predictive of the subject's belief about which treatment they had received (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The simulated acupuncture procedure evaluated in this study represents a reasonable control treatment for acupuncture-na{\"i}ve individuals in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain.",
author = "Sherman, {Karen J.} and Hogeboom, {Charissa J.} and Cherkin, {Daniel C.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)}",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "11--19",
journal = "Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine",
issn = "1075-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Description and validation of a noninvasive placebo acupuncture procedure

AU - Sherman, Karen J.

AU - Hogeboom, Charissa J.

AU - Cherkin, Daniel C.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objective: To evaluate a simulated acupuncture technique for use in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain. Setting: The clinic of an accredited acupuncture college in Seattle, Washington. Subjects: Acupuncture-naïve enrollees of Group Health Cooperative who had visited their primary care provider with a complaint of back pain that persisted for at least 3 months. Experimental design: In the first experiment, subjects received six insertions of real needles and six pokes with a toothpick in a guidetube in a two-period crossover design. In the second experiment, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either a complete treatment with real acupuncture needles or a simulated treatment using a toothpick in a guidetube. Outcomes: In the first experiment, we compared subjects' perceptions about which implement was used for each "insertion" while in the second, we compared the perceptions (e.g., acupuncturist's warmth and caring, the reasonableness of acupuncture as a treatment) and pain relief of those who received an acupuncture treatment using needles to those receiving simulated acupuncture. Results: In the first experiment, the toothpick insertions were perceived as slightly more like real needling than the real needling (mean ratings of 2.8 and 2.1, respectively; p = 0.08). In the second experiment, 52% percent of those receiving the simulated needling versus 65% of those receiving real acupuncture believed they were "definitely" or "probably" receiving real acupuncture (p = 0.33). Perceptions of acupuncture, as measured by a credibility questionnaire, were similar in the two groups. Those receiving real acupuncture were more likely to report immediate pain relief, and this was the factor most predictive of the subject's belief about which treatment they had received (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The simulated acupuncture procedure evaluated in this study represents a reasonable control treatment for acupuncture-naïve individuals in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain.

AB - Objective: To evaluate a simulated acupuncture technique for use in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain. Setting: The clinic of an accredited acupuncture college in Seattle, Washington. Subjects: Acupuncture-naïve enrollees of Group Health Cooperative who had visited their primary care provider with a complaint of back pain that persisted for at least 3 months. Experimental design: In the first experiment, subjects received six insertions of real needles and six pokes with a toothpick in a guidetube in a two-period crossover design. In the second experiment, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either a complete treatment with real acupuncture needles or a simulated treatment using a toothpick in a guidetube. Outcomes: In the first experiment, we compared subjects' perceptions about which implement was used for each "insertion" while in the second, we compared the perceptions (e.g., acupuncturist's warmth and caring, the reasonableness of acupuncture as a treatment) and pain relief of those who received an acupuncture treatment using needles to those receiving simulated acupuncture. Results: In the first experiment, the toothpick insertions were perceived as slightly more like real needling than the real needling (mean ratings of 2.8 and 2.1, respectively; p = 0.08). In the second experiment, 52% percent of those receiving the simulated needling versus 65% of those receiving real acupuncture believed they were "definitely" or "probably" receiving real acupuncture (p = 0.33). Perceptions of acupuncture, as measured by a credibility questionnaire, were similar in the two groups. Those receiving real acupuncture were more likely to report immediate pain relief, and this was the factor most predictive of the subject's belief about which treatment they had received (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The simulated acupuncture procedure evaluated in this study represents a reasonable control treatment for acupuncture-naïve individuals in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036183408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036183408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 11

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

JF - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

SN - 1075-5535

IS - 1

ER -