Describing remote electronic documents in the online catalog: Current issues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationship between the library catalog and electronic resources is different than that between the catalog and physical materials. Cataloging rules were originally designed to help patrons use a manual card catalog to find physical works on a shelf. However, these rules apply awkwardly to electronic resources because functionally different electronic works raise special cataloging issues. This article discusses the problems of describing remote electronic resources in the online catalog. It concludes that descriptive information helps the user identify the work s/he needs, but that it is practical to provide only minimal descriptive information for remote electronic resources in the catalog record. To a limited extent, the access lost from less description can be replaced with new cataloging techniques designed to stabilize the catalog record.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-20
Number of pages16
JournalCataloging and Classification Quarterly
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 13 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

electronics
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Describing remote electronic documents in the online catalog : Current issues. / Banerjee, John.

In: Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, 13.01.1998, p. 5-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17dcbbc75aac476da9d42124f37728fd,
title = "Describing remote electronic documents in the online catalog: Current issues",
abstract = "The relationship between the library catalog and electronic resources is different than that between the catalog and physical materials. Cataloging rules were originally designed to help patrons use a manual card catalog to find physical works on a shelf. However, these rules apply awkwardly to electronic resources because functionally different electronic works raise special cataloging issues. This article discusses the problems of describing remote electronic resources in the online catalog. It concludes that descriptive information helps the user identify the work s/he needs, but that it is practical to provide only minimal descriptive information for remote electronic resources in the catalog record. To a limited extent, the access lost from less description can be replaced with new cataloging techniques designed to stabilize the catalog record.",
author = "John Banerjee",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1300/J104v25n01_02",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "5--20",
journal = "Cataloging and Classification Quarterly",
issn = "0163-9374",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Describing remote electronic documents in the online catalog

T2 - Current issues

AU - Banerjee, John

PY - 1998/1/13

Y1 - 1998/1/13

N2 - The relationship between the library catalog and electronic resources is different than that between the catalog and physical materials. Cataloging rules were originally designed to help patrons use a manual card catalog to find physical works on a shelf. However, these rules apply awkwardly to electronic resources because functionally different electronic works raise special cataloging issues. This article discusses the problems of describing remote electronic resources in the online catalog. It concludes that descriptive information helps the user identify the work s/he needs, but that it is practical to provide only minimal descriptive information for remote electronic resources in the catalog record. To a limited extent, the access lost from less description can be replaced with new cataloging techniques designed to stabilize the catalog record.

AB - The relationship between the library catalog and electronic resources is different than that between the catalog and physical materials. Cataloging rules were originally designed to help patrons use a manual card catalog to find physical works on a shelf. However, these rules apply awkwardly to electronic resources because functionally different electronic works raise special cataloging issues. This article discusses the problems of describing remote electronic resources in the online catalog. It concludes that descriptive information helps the user identify the work s/he needs, but that it is practical to provide only minimal descriptive information for remote electronic resources in the catalog record. To a limited extent, the access lost from less description can be replaced with new cataloging techniques designed to stabilize the catalog record.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986106510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986106510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J104v25n01_02

DO - 10.1300/J104v25n01_02

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986106510

VL - 25

SP - 5

EP - 20

JO - Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

JF - Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

SN - 0163-9374

IS - 1

ER -