Depression Symptoms Declining Among Older Adults

Birth Cohort Analyses From the Rust Belt

Kevin J. Sullivan, Anran Liu, Hiroko Dodge, Carmen Andreescu, Chung Chou H. Chang, Mary Ganguli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate potential birth cohort effects in depression symptoms in older adults. Design: Population-based prospective cohort. Setting: Small-town communities in Pennsylvania. Participants: Three thousand two hundred and twenty seven older adults (average baseline age = 71.6) born between 1902 and 1941. Measurements: Four decade-long birth cohorts were the primary predictors in this study: 1902–1911, 1912–1921, 1922–1931, and 1932–1941. The outcome was symptoms of depression assessed at baseline and follow-up study visits using a modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (mCES-D). The depression outcome was operationalized as: 1). A binary outcome of having greater than equal to 5 depression symptoms on the total mCES-D at any study visit, and 2). A continuous outcome of four factor-analyzed component scores of the mCES-D including depressed mood, anergia/hopelessness, withdrawal, and poor self-esteem. All analyses were jointly modeled with attrition and adjusted for age, sex, education, Mini Mental State Examination score, antidepressant medications, and total prescription medications. Results: Participants from more recently born cohorts were significantly less likely to have a study visit in which they reported greater than or equal to 5 depression symptoms, controlling for attrition. Specifically, in comparison to the 1902–1911 referent cohort, the 1912–1921 birth cohort was 43% less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.566, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.341–0.939), the 1922–1931 birth cohort was 63% less likely (OR = 0.0369, 95% CI: 0.215–0.632), and the 1932–1941 cohort was 79% less likely (OR = 0.205, 95% CI: 0.106–0.399). The cohort effect was most evident in the depressed mood and anergia/hopelessness symptom composites. Conclusion: Reduced rates of depression symptoms observed in successive birth cohorts of older adults may reflect compression of morbidity or other secular trends.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Cohort Studies
Parturition
Depression
Epidemiologic Studies
Cohort Effect
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Sex Education
Self Concept
Antidepressive Agents
Prescriptions
Morbidity
Population

Keywords

  • birth cohort
  • Depression
  • epidemiology
  • subsyndromal depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Depression Symptoms Declining Among Older Adults : Birth Cohort Analyses From the Rust Belt. / Sullivan, Kevin J.; Liu, Anran; Dodge, Hiroko; Andreescu, Carmen; Chang, Chung Chou H.; Ganguli, Mary.

In: American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sullivan, Kevin J. ; Liu, Anran ; Dodge, Hiroko ; Andreescu, Carmen ; Chang, Chung Chou H. ; Ganguli, Mary. / Depression Symptoms Declining Among Older Adults : Birth Cohort Analyses From the Rust Belt. In: American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2019.
@article{7940c048ab6d4f9fab07f240b9c4cdda,
title = "Depression Symptoms Declining Among Older Adults: Birth Cohort Analyses From the Rust Belt",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate potential birth cohort effects in depression symptoms in older adults. Design: Population-based prospective cohort. Setting: Small-town communities in Pennsylvania. Participants: Three thousand two hundred and twenty seven older adults (average baseline age = 71.6) born between 1902 and 1941. Measurements: Four decade-long birth cohorts were the primary predictors in this study: 1902–1911, 1912–1921, 1922–1931, and 1932–1941. The outcome was symptoms of depression assessed at baseline and follow-up study visits using a modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (mCES-D). The depression outcome was operationalized as: 1). A binary outcome of having greater than equal to 5 depression symptoms on the total mCES-D at any study visit, and 2). A continuous outcome of four factor-analyzed component scores of the mCES-D including depressed mood, anergia/hopelessness, withdrawal, and poor self-esteem. All analyses were jointly modeled with attrition and adjusted for age, sex, education, Mini Mental State Examination score, antidepressant medications, and total prescription medications. Results: Participants from more recently born cohorts were significantly less likely to have a study visit in which they reported greater than or equal to 5 depression symptoms, controlling for attrition. Specifically, in comparison to the 1902–1911 referent cohort, the 1912–1921 birth cohort was 43{\%} less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.566, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 0.341–0.939), the 1922–1931 birth cohort was 63{\%} less likely (OR = 0.0369, 95{\%} CI: 0.215–0.632), and the 1932–1941 cohort was 79{\%} less likely (OR = 0.205, 95{\%} CI: 0.106–0.399). The cohort effect was most evident in the depressed mood and anergia/hopelessness symptom composites. Conclusion: Reduced rates of depression symptoms observed in successive birth cohorts of older adults may reflect compression of morbidity or other secular trends.",
keywords = "birth cohort, Depression, epidemiology, subsyndromal depression",
author = "Sullivan, {Kevin J.} and Anran Liu and Hiroko Dodge and Carmen Andreescu and Chang, {Chung Chou H.} and Mary Ganguli",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jagp.2019.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "1064-7481",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Depression Symptoms Declining Among Older Adults

T2 - Birth Cohort Analyses From the Rust Belt

AU - Sullivan, Kevin J.

AU - Liu, Anran

AU - Dodge, Hiroko

AU - Andreescu, Carmen

AU - Chang, Chung Chou H.

AU - Ganguli, Mary

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To investigate potential birth cohort effects in depression symptoms in older adults. Design: Population-based prospective cohort. Setting: Small-town communities in Pennsylvania. Participants: Three thousand two hundred and twenty seven older adults (average baseline age = 71.6) born between 1902 and 1941. Measurements: Four decade-long birth cohorts were the primary predictors in this study: 1902–1911, 1912–1921, 1922–1931, and 1932–1941. The outcome was symptoms of depression assessed at baseline and follow-up study visits using a modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (mCES-D). The depression outcome was operationalized as: 1). A binary outcome of having greater than equal to 5 depression symptoms on the total mCES-D at any study visit, and 2). A continuous outcome of four factor-analyzed component scores of the mCES-D including depressed mood, anergia/hopelessness, withdrawal, and poor self-esteem. All analyses were jointly modeled with attrition and adjusted for age, sex, education, Mini Mental State Examination score, antidepressant medications, and total prescription medications. Results: Participants from more recently born cohorts were significantly less likely to have a study visit in which they reported greater than or equal to 5 depression symptoms, controlling for attrition. Specifically, in comparison to the 1902–1911 referent cohort, the 1912–1921 birth cohort was 43% less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.566, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.341–0.939), the 1922–1931 birth cohort was 63% less likely (OR = 0.0369, 95% CI: 0.215–0.632), and the 1932–1941 cohort was 79% less likely (OR = 0.205, 95% CI: 0.106–0.399). The cohort effect was most evident in the depressed mood and anergia/hopelessness symptom composites. Conclusion: Reduced rates of depression symptoms observed in successive birth cohorts of older adults may reflect compression of morbidity or other secular trends.

AB - Objectives: To investigate potential birth cohort effects in depression symptoms in older adults. Design: Population-based prospective cohort. Setting: Small-town communities in Pennsylvania. Participants: Three thousand two hundred and twenty seven older adults (average baseline age = 71.6) born between 1902 and 1941. Measurements: Four decade-long birth cohorts were the primary predictors in this study: 1902–1911, 1912–1921, 1922–1931, and 1932–1941. The outcome was symptoms of depression assessed at baseline and follow-up study visits using a modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (mCES-D). The depression outcome was operationalized as: 1). A binary outcome of having greater than equal to 5 depression symptoms on the total mCES-D at any study visit, and 2). A continuous outcome of four factor-analyzed component scores of the mCES-D including depressed mood, anergia/hopelessness, withdrawal, and poor self-esteem. All analyses were jointly modeled with attrition and adjusted for age, sex, education, Mini Mental State Examination score, antidepressant medications, and total prescription medications. Results: Participants from more recently born cohorts were significantly less likely to have a study visit in which they reported greater than or equal to 5 depression symptoms, controlling for attrition. Specifically, in comparison to the 1902–1911 referent cohort, the 1912–1921 birth cohort was 43% less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.566, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.341–0.939), the 1922–1931 birth cohort was 63% less likely (OR = 0.0369, 95% CI: 0.215–0.632), and the 1932–1941 cohort was 79% less likely (OR = 0.205, 95% CI: 0.106–0.399). The cohort effect was most evident in the depressed mood and anergia/hopelessness symptom composites. Conclusion: Reduced rates of depression symptoms observed in successive birth cohorts of older adults may reflect compression of morbidity or other secular trends.

KW - birth cohort

KW - Depression

KW - epidemiology

KW - subsyndromal depression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068481172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068481172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.06.002

M3 - Article

JO - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 1064-7481

ER -