Deliberative decision making and the treatment of pain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, increased emphasis has been placed on the ethical duty of physicians to relieve pain and suffering. According to a 1992 report from The Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR), the "ethical obligation to manage pain and relieve the patient's suffering is at the core of a health care professional's commitment." However, despite the increased emphasis on the ethical duty to relieve pain, the undertreatment of pain continues to be a serious problem. This problem has been widely discussed, but so far efforts to respond to it have focused almost exclusively on institutional and educational solutions. Yet surprisingly in this discussion very little attention has been paid to articulating a constructive role for the patient in combating this problem. In this article I argue that adequate pain treatment will often require the active participation of the patient in the decision making process. Given the special nature of pain and the special problems that arise in the treatment of pain, adequate pain treatment requires that physicians and patients realize a particular model of shared decision making - one that I refer to as deliberative decision making. As will become clear, my defense of this model is limited to the context of pain management and may not apply in other clinical contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-30
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Palliative Medicine
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Pain
Therapeutics
Psychological Stress
United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Physicians
Patient Participation
Pain Management
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Deliberative decision making and the treatment of pain. / Jansen, Lynn.

In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2001, p. 23-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a9653b19c0a043b992b0662118fa82b3,
title = "Deliberative decision making and the treatment of pain",
abstract = "In recent years, increased emphasis has been placed on the ethical duty of physicians to relieve pain and suffering. According to a 1992 report from The Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR), the {"}ethical obligation to manage pain and relieve the patient's suffering is at the core of a health care professional's commitment.{"} However, despite the increased emphasis on the ethical duty to relieve pain, the undertreatment of pain continues to be a serious problem. This problem has been widely discussed, but so far efforts to respond to it have focused almost exclusively on institutional and educational solutions. Yet surprisingly in this discussion very little attention has been paid to articulating a constructive role for the patient in combating this problem. In this article I argue that adequate pain treatment will often require the active participation of the patient in the decision making process. Given the special nature of pain and the special problems that arise in the treatment of pain, adequate pain treatment requires that physicians and patients realize a particular model of shared decision making - one that I refer to as deliberative decision making. As will become clear, my defense of this model is limited to the context of pain management and may not apply in other clinical contexts.",
author = "Lynn Jansen",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1089/109662101300051924",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "23--30",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deliberative decision making and the treatment of pain

AU - Jansen, Lynn

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - In recent years, increased emphasis has been placed on the ethical duty of physicians to relieve pain and suffering. According to a 1992 report from The Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR), the "ethical obligation to manage pain and relieve the patient's suffering is at the core of a health care professional's commitment." However, despite the increased emphasis on the ethical duty to relieve pain, the undertreatment of pain continues to be a serious problem. This problem has been widely discussed, but so far efforts to respond to it have focused almost exclusively on institutional and educational solutions. Yet surprisingly in this discussion very little attention has been paid to articulating a constructive role for the patient in combating this problem. In this article I argue that adequate pain treatment will often require the active participation of the patient in the decision making process. Given the special nature of pain and the special problems that arise in the treatment of pain, adequate pain treatment requires that physicians and patients realize a particular model of shared decision making - one that I refer to as deliberative decision making. As will become clear, my defense of this model is limited to the context of pain management and may not apply in other clinical contexts.

AB - In recent years, increased emphasis has been placed on the ethical duty of physicians to relieve pain and suffering. According to a 1992 report from The Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR), the "ethical obligation to manage pain and relieve the patient's suffering is at the core of a health care professional's commitment." However, despite the increased emphasis on the ethical duty to relieve pain, the undertreatment of pain continues to be a serious problem. This problem has been widely discussed, but so far efforts to respond to it have focused almost exclusively on institutional and educational solutions. Yet surprisingly in this discussion very little attention has been paid to articulating a constructive role for the patient in combating this problem. In this article I argue that adequate pain treatment will often require the active participation of the patient in the decision making process. Given the special nature of pain and the special problems that arise in the treatment of pain, adequate pain treatment requires that physicians and patients realize a particular model of shared decision making - one that I refer to as deliberative decision making. As will become clear, my defense of this model is limited to the context of pain management and may not apply in other clinical contexts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035065776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035065776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/109662101300051924

DO - 10.1089/109662101300051924

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 23

EP - 30

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 1

ER -