TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining the surgical critical care research agenda
T2 - Results of a gaps analysis from the Critical Care Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma
AU - Kim, Dennis Y.
AU - Lissauer, Matt
AU - Martin, Niels
AU - Brasel, Karen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - BACKGROUND There has been an unprecedented increase in critical care research recently, and there is a need for an organized and systematic approach to surgical critical care research planning. The purpose of this article was to establish a surgical critical care research agenda via a systematic review of the literature and needs assessment. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify high-impact critical care articles since 1999 on the basis of citation data. Using a standardized data abstraction tool, surgical representation in the literature was analyzed. A needs assessment was performed using a modified Delphi approach in three rounds to obtain consensus among members of the Critical Care Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (n = 30) regarding research priorities in surgical critical care. RESULTS Of 1,019 articles screened, 645 underwent full-text review, and 276 articles were included in the final analysis. Surgical patients were identified in 177 studies (64.1%), whereas trauma patients were identified in 82 (31.7%). Key categories identified during the first round of the Delphi included end of life care, traumatic brain injury (TBI), delirium, post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), hemodynamic monitoring, and volume/fluid balance. During the second and third rounds, 10 topics were classified as high priority. The three highest ranked topics were: Addressing goals of care in the acute care setting (4.44 ± 0.70); improving prognostic indicators in patients with severe TBI (4.38 ± 0.85); and interventions to mitigate PICS (4.22 ± 0.65). There was a strong positive correlation in ratings (Rs value = 0.90, p = 0.001) between rounds 2 and 3. CONCLUSION The results of this study highlight the recent surgical critical care research literature and may serve as a platform for future research endeavors in surgical critical care.
AB - BACKGROUND There has been an unprecedented increase in critical care research recently, and there is a need for an organized and systematic approach to surgical critical care research planning. The purpose of this article was to establish a surgical critical care research agenda via a systematic review of the literature and needs assessment. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify high-impact critical care articles since 1999 on the basis of citation data. Using a standardized data abstraction tool, surgical representation in the literature was analyzed. A needs assessment was performed using a modified Delphi approach in three rounds to obtain consensus among members of the Critical Care Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (n = 30) regarding research priorities in surgical critical care. RESULTS Of 1,019 articles screened, 645 underwent full-text review, and 276 articles were included in the final analysis. Surgical patients were identified in 177 studies (64.1%), whereas trauma patients were identified in 82 (31.7%). Key categories identified during the first round of the Delphi included end of life care, traumatic brain injury (TBI), delirium, post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), hemodynamic monitoring, and volume/fluid balance. During the second and third rounds, 10 topics were classified as high priority. The three highest ranked topics were: Addressing goals of care in the acute care setting (4.44 ± 0.70); improving prognostic indicators in patients with severe TBI (4.38 ± 0.85); and interventions to mitigate PICS (4.22 ± 0.65). There was a strong positive correlation in ratings (Rs value = 0.90, p = 0.001) between rounds 2 and 3. CONCLUSION The results of this study highlight the recent surgical critical care research literature and may serve as a platform for future research endeavors in surgical critical care.
KW - Critical care
KW - Delphi
KW - gaps
KW - intensive care
KW - research
KW - surgical critical care
KW - systematic review
KW - trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078691242&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078691242&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002532
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002532
M3 - Article
C2 - 31688786
AN - SCOPUS:85078691242
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 88
SP - 320
EP - 329
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 2
ER -