Defining the need for faculty in family medicine: Results of a national survey

R. L. Holloway, A. M. Marbella, J. M. Townsend, J. M. Tudor, J. W. Tollison, John Saultz, R. A. Sherwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although numerous anecdotal reports are being offered about the growing number of unfilled faculty positions in US family medicine departments, virtually no literature exists on faculty recruitment. The objective of this study was to define the scope and nature of current faculty recruitment needs in family medicine. Methods: A national survey was sent to all family medicine department chairs and family practice residency program directors concerning faculty positions untilled at their sites and positions for which recruitment would occur within the next 5 years. The survey asked for information on currently available positions; academic title of position; percentage of time to be devoted to clinical, educational, administrative, and research activities; primal focus of the position; date when the position became available; and the length of time the position has been unfilled. Similar information was collected on positions anticipated to be available within the next 5 years. Results: A total of 364 surveys were returned, for an overall response rate of 70%. Information firm the survey revealed a current, substantial demand for family medicine faculty throughout the country, with an even greater demand anticipated for the near future. Respondents reported 496 currently unfilled positions for family medicine faculty and another 677 positions anticipated to be available within the next 19.5 months on average. A total of 89.7% of those anticipated positions were reported as either 'certain' or 'somewhat certain,' in terms of likelihood of availability. Conclusions: The demand for family medicine faculty is increasing, and much of the demand is financially motivated. Clinical expectations appear to be higher among departments than for residencies. Finally, it was revealed that most positions had minimal allotments for research time. Family medicine must recommit itself to the development of a scholarly agenda as it recruits new faculty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)98-102
Number of pages5
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume27
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicine
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires
Family Practice
Research
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Holloway, R. L., Marbella, A. M., Townsend, J. M., Tudor, J. M., Tollison, J. W., Saultz, J., & Sherwood, R. A. (1995). Defining the need for faculty in family medicine: Results of a national survey. Family Medicine, 27(2), 98-102.

Defining the need for faculty in family medicine : Results of a national survey. / Holloway, R. L.; Marbella, A. M.; Townsend, J. M.; Tudor, J. M.; Tollison, J. W.; Saultz, John; Sherwood, R. A.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1995, p. 98-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holloway, RL, Marbella, AM, Townsend, JM, Tudor, JM, Tollison, JW, Saultz, J & Sherwood, RA 1995, 'Defining the need for faculty in family medicine: Results of a national survey', Family Medicine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 98-102.
Holloway RL, Marbella AM, Townsend JM, Tudor JM, Tollison JW, Saultz J et al. Defining the need for faculty in family medicine: Results of a national survey. Family Medicine. 1995;27(2):98-102.
Holloway, R. L. ; Marbella, A. M. ; Townsend, J. M. ; Tudor, J. M. ; Tollison, J. W. ; Saultz, John ; Sherwood, R. A. / Defining the need for faculty in family medicine : Results of a national survey. In: Family Medicine. 1995 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 98-102.
@article{2556e6cc75b045189211f9153bdf8d88,
title = "Defining the need for faculty in family medicine: Results of a national survey",
abstract = "Background: Although numerous anecdotal reports are being offered about the growing number of unfilled faculty positions in US family medicine departments, virtually no literature exists on faculty recruitment. The objective of this study was to define the scope and nature of current faculty recruitment needs in family medicine. Methods: A national survey was sent to all family medicine department chairs and family practice residency program directors concerning faculty positions untilled at their sites and positions for which recruitment would occur within the next 5 years. The survey asked for information on currently available positions; academic title of position; percentage of time to be devoted to clinical, educational, administrative, and research activities; primal focus of the position; date when the position became available; and the length of time the position has been unfilled. Similar information was collected on positions anticipated to be available within the next 5 years. Results: A total of 364 surveys were returned, for an overall response rate of 70{\%}. Information firm the survey revealed a current, substantial demand for family medicine faculty throughout the country, with an even greater demand anticipated for the near future. Respondents reported 496 currently unfilled positions for family medicine faculty and another 677 positions anticipated to be available within the next 19.5 months on average. A total of 89.7{\%} of those anticipated positions were reported as either 'certain' or 'somewhat certain,' in terms of likelihood of availability. Conclusions: The demand for family medicine faculty is increasing, and much of the demand is financially motivated. Clinical expectations appear to be higher among departments than for residencies. Finally, it was revealed that most positions had minimal allotments for research time. Family medicine must recommit itself to the development of a scholarly agenda as it recruits new faculty.",
author = "Holloway, {R. L.} and Marbella, {A. M.} and Townsend, {J. M.} and Tudor, {J. M.} and Tollison, {J. W.} and John Saultz and Sherwood, {R. A.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "98--102",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining the need for faculty in family medicine

T2 - Results of a national survey

AU - Holloway, R. L.

AU - Marbella, A. M.

AU - Townsend, J. M.

AU - Tudor, J. M.

AU - Tollison, J. W.

AU - Saultz, John

AU - Sherwood, R. A.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Background: Although numerous anecdotal reports are being offered about the growing number of unfilled faculty positions in US family medicine departments, virtually no literature exists on faculty recruitment. The objective of this study was to define the scope and nature of current faculty recruitment needs in family medicine. Methods: A national survey was sent to all family medicine department chairs and family practice residency program directors concerning faculty positions untilled at their sites and positions for which recruitment would occur within the next 5 years. The survey asked for information on currently available positions; academic title of position; percentage of time to be devoted to clinical, educational, administrative, and research activities; primal focus of the position; date when the position became available; and the length of time the position has been unfilled. Similar information was collected on positions anticipated to be available within the next 5 years. Results: A total of 364 surveys were returned, for an overall response rate of 70%. Information firm the survey revealed a current, substantial demand for family medicine faculty throughout the country, with an even greater demand anticipated for the near future. Respondents reported 496 currently unfilled positions for family medicine faculty and another 677 positions anticipated to be available within the next 19.5 months on average. A total of 89.7% of those anticipated positions were reported as either 'certain' or 'somewhat certain,' in terms of likelihood of availability. Conclusions: The demand for family medicine faculty is increasing, and much of the demand is financially motivated. Clinical expectations appear to be higher among departments than for residencies. Finally, it was revealed that most positions had minimal allotments for research time. Family medicine must recommit itself to the development of a scholarly agenda as it recruits new faculty.

AB - Background: Although numerous anecdotal reports are being offered about the growing number of unfilled faculty positions in US family medicine departments, virtually no literature exists on faculty recruitment. The objective of this study was to define the scope and nature of current faculty recruitment needs in family medicine. Methods: A national survey was sent to all family medicine department chairs and family practice residency program directors concerning faculty positions untilled at their sites and positions for which recruitment would occur within the next 5 years. The survey asked for information on currently available positions; academic title of position; percentage of time to be devoted to clinical, educational, administrative, and research activities; primal focus of the position; date when the position became available; and the length of time the position has been unfilled. Similar information was collected on positions anticipated to be available within the next 5 years. Results: A total of 364 surveys were returned, for an overall response rate of 70%. Information firm the survey revealed a current, substantial demand for family medicine faculty throughout the country, with an even greater demand anticipated for the near future. Respondents reported 496 currently unfilled positions for family medicine faculty and another 677 positions anticipated to be available within the next 19.5 months on average. A total of 89.7% of those anticipated positions were reported as either 'certain' or 'somewhat certain,' in terms of likelihood of availability. Conclusions: The demand for family medicine faculty is increasing, and much of the demand is financially motivated. Clinical expectations appear to be higher among departments than for residencies. Finally, it was revealed that most positions had minimal allotments for research time. Family medicine must recommit itself to the development of a scholarly agenda as it recruits new faculty.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028887931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028887931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7737451

AN - SCOPUS:0028887931

VL - 27

SP - 98

EP - 102

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 2

ER -