Defining patient safety in hospice: Principles to guide measurement and public reporting

David Casarett, Carol Spence, Melissa A. Clark, Renée Shield, Joan Teno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite progress towards safer care in most settings, there has been much less attention to improving safety in hospices, which care for more than 1,500,000 patients every year. In this article, we describe three serious conflicts that arise when safety measures from other settings are applied to hospice. First, safety measures that are imposed in order to reduce morbidity and mortality may be irrelevant for a hospice patient whose goals focus on comfort. Second, safety measures that are defined in patients with a life expectancy of years can be inappropriate for hospice patients whose typical survival is measured in days. Third, it can be very difficult to assign responsibility for the safety of hospice patients, whose care is provided mostly by family and friends. Therefore, generally accepted safety measures are often inappropriate for hospice care, and can lead to unintended consequences if they are applied without critical evaluation or modification. Instead, we suggest three principles that can guide the development of hospice-appropriate safety measures by considering a patient's goals and life expectancy, and the degree to which responsibility for a patient's care is shared.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1120-1123
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of palliative medicine
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospices
Patient Safety
Safety
Hospice Care
Life Expectancy
Patient Care
Morbidity
Survival
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Defining patient safety in hospice : Principles to guide measurement and public reporting. / Casarett, David; Spence, Carol; Clark, Melissa A.; Shield, Renée; Teno, Joan.

In: Journal of palliative medicine, Vol. 15, No. 10, 01.10.2012, p. 1120-1123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Casarett, David ; Spence, Carol ; Clark, Melissa A. ; Shield, Renée ; Teno, Joan. / Defining patient safety in hospice : Principles to guide measurement and public reporting. In: Journal of palliative medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 15, No. 10. pp. 1120-1123.
@article{0f426ccec1fd4fe5ac1d02c02475d209,
title = "Defining patient safety in hospice: Principles to guide measurement and public reporting",
abstract = "Despite progress towards safer care in most settings, there has been much less attention to improving safety in hospices, which care for more than 1,500,000 patients every year. In this article, we describe three serious conflicts that arise when safety measures from other settings are applied to hospice. First, safety measures that are imposed in order to reduce morbidity and mortality may be irrelevant for a hospice patient whose goals focus on comfort. Second, safety measures that are defined in patients with a life expectancy of years can be inappropriate for hospice patients whose typical survival is measured in days. Third, it can be very difficult to assign responsibility for the safety of hospice patients, whose care is provided mostly by family and friends. Therefore, generally accepted safety measures are often inappropriate for hospice care, and can lead to unintended consequences if they are applied without critical evaluation or modification. Instead, we suggest three principles that can guide the development of hospice-appropriate safety measures by considering a patient's goals and life expectancy, and the degree to which responsibility for a patient's care is shared.",
author = "David Casarett and Carol Spence and Clark, {Melissa A.} and Ren{\'e}e Shield and Joan Teno",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.2011.0530",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1120--1123",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining patient safety in hospice

T2 - Principles to guide measurement and public reporting

AU - Casarett, David

AU - Spence, Carol

AU - Clark, Melissa A.

AU - Shield, Renée

AU - Teno, Joan

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Despite progress towards safer care in most settings, there has been much less attention to improving safety in hospices, which care for more than 1,500,000 patients every year. In this article, we describe three serious conflicts that arise when safety measures from other settings are applied to hospice. First, safety measures that are imposed in order to reduce morbidity and mortality may be irrelevant for a hospice patient whose goals focus on comfort. Second, safety measures that are defined in patients with a life expectancy of years can be inappropriate for hospice patients whose typical survival is measured in days. Third, it can be very difficult to assign responsibility for the safety of hospice patients, whose care is provided mostly by family and friends. Therefore, generally accepted safety measures are often inappropriate for hospice care, and can lead to unintended consequences if they are applied without critical evaluation or modification. Instead, we suggest three principles that can guide the development of hospice-appropriate safety measures by considering a patient's goals and life expectancy, and the degree to which responsibility for a patient's care is shared.

AB - Despite progress towards safer care in most settings, there has been much less attention to improving safety in hospices, which care for more than 1,500,000 patients every year. In this article, we describe three serious conflicts that arise when safety measures from other settings are applied to hospice. First, safety measures that are imposed in order to reduce morbidity and mortality may be irrelevant for a hospice patient whose goals focus on comfort. Second, safety measures that are defined in patients with a life expectancy of years can be inappropriate for hospice patients whose typical survival is measured in days. Third, it can be very difficult to assign responsibility for the safety of hospice patients, whose care is provided mostly by family and friends. Therefore, generally accepted safety measures are often inappropriate for hospice care, and can lead to unintended consequences if they are applied without critical evaluation or modification. Instead, we suggest three principles that can guide the development of hospice-appropriate safety measures by considering a patient's goals and life expectancy, and the degree to which responsibility for a patient's care is shared.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866289550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866289550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2011.0530

DO - 10.1089/jpm.2011.0530

M3 - Article

C2 - 22690916

AN - SCOPUS:84866289550

VL - 15

SP - 1120

EP - 1123

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 10

ER -