Defining menopausal status in epidemiologic studies: A comparison of multiple approaches and their effects on breast cancer rates

Amanda I. Phipps, Laura Ichikawa, Erin J A Bowles, Patricia (Patty) Carney, Karla Kerlikowske, Diana L. Miglioretti, Diana S M Buist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Menopausal status is a common covariate in epidemiologic studies. Still, there are no standard definitions for menopausal status using observational data. This study assesses distinctions between menopausal status definitions using commonly collected epidemiologic data, and explores their impact on study outcomes using breast cancer rates as an example. Study design: Using survey data from 227,700 women aged 40-64 who received screening mammograms from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, we classified menopausal status under five different definitions: one complex definition combining multiple variables, two definitions using age as a proxy for menopausal status, one based only on menstrual period status, and one based on age and menstrual period status. Main outcome measures: We compared the distribution of menopausal status and menopausal status-specific breast cancer incidence and detection rates across definitions for menopausal status. Results: Overall, 36% and 29% of women were consistently classified as postmenopausal and premenopausal, respectively, across all definitions. Menopausal status-specific breast cancer incidence and detection rates were similar across definitions. Rates were unchanged when information regarding natural menopause, bilateral oophorectomy, hormone therapy, and timing of last menstrual period were sequentially added to definitions of postmenopausal status. Conclusions: Distinctions in menopausal status definitions contribute to notable differences in how women are classified, but translate to only slight differences in menopausal status-specific breast cancer rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-66
Number of pages7
JournalMaturitas
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Studies
Screening
Hormones
Breast Neoplasms
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Incidence
Ovariectomy
Proxy
Menopause
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Concordance
  • Incidence
  • Menopause

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Defining menopausal status in epidemiologic studies : A comparison of multiple approaches and their effects on breast cancer rates. / Phipps, Amanda I.; Ichikawa, Laura; Bowles, Erin J A; Carney, Patricia (Patty); Kerlikowske, Karla; Miglioretti, Diana L.; Buist, Diana S M.

In: Maturitas, Vol. 67, No. 1, 09.2010, p. 60-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Phipps, Amanda I. ; Ichikawa, Laura ; Bowles, Erin J A ; Carney, Patricia (Patty) ; Kerlikowske, Karla ; Miglioretti, Diana L. ; Buist, Diana S M. / Defining menopausal status in epidemiologic studies : A comparison of multiple approaches and their effects on breast cancer rates. In: Maturitas. 2010 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 60-66.
@article{a5350f8027a846339fec75cbe47b2b96,
title = "Defining menopausal status in epidemiologic studies: A comparison of multiple approaches and their effects on breast cancer rates",
abstract = "Objectives: Menopausal status is a common covariate in epidemiologic studies. Still, there are no standard definitions for menopausal status using observational data. This study assesses distinctions between menopausal status definitions using commonly collected epidemiologic data, and explores their impact on study outcomes using breast cancer rates as an example. Study design: Using survey data from 227,700 women aged 40-64 who received screening mammograms from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, we classified menopausal status under five different definitions: one complex definition combining multiple variables, two definitions using age as a proxy for menopausal status, one based only on menstrual period status, and one based on age and menstrual period status. Main outcome measures: We compared the distribution of menopausal status and menopausal status-specific breast cancer incidence and detection rates across definitions for menopausal status. Results: Overall, 36{\%} and 29{\%} of women were consistently classified as postmenopausal and premenopausal, respectively, across all definitions. Menopausal status-specific breast cancer incidence and detection rates were similar across definitions. Rates were unchanged when information regarding natural menopause, bilateral oophorectomy, hormone therapy, and timing of last menstrual period were sequentially added to definitions of postmenopausal status. Conclusions: Distinctions in menopausal status definitions contribute to notable differences in how women are classified, but translate to only slight differences in menopausal status-specific breast cancer rates.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Concordance, Incidence, Menopause",
author = "Phipps, {Amanda I.} and Laura Ichikawa and Bowles, {Erin J A} and Carney, {Patricia (Patty)} and Karla Kerlikowske and Miglioretti, {Diana L.} and Buist, {Diana S M}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.04.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "60--66",
journal = "Maturitas",
issn = "0378-5122",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining menopausal status in epidemiologic studies

T2 - A comparison of multiple approaches and their effects on breast cancer rates

AU - Phipps, Amanda I.

AU - Ichikawa, Laura

AU - Bowles, Erin J A

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

AU - Kerlikowske, Karla

AU - Miglioretti, Diana L.

AU - Buist, Diana S M

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Objectives: Menopausal status is a common covariate in epidemiologic studies. Still, there are no standard definitions for menopausal status using observational data. This study assesses distinctions between menopausal status definitions using commonly collected epidemiologic data, and explores their impact on study outcomes using breast cancer rates as an example. Study design: Using survey data from 227,700 women aged 40-64 who received screening mammograms from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, we classified menopausal status under five different definitions: one complex definition combining multiple variables, two definitions using age as a proxy for menopausal status, one based only on menstrual period status, and one based on age and menstrual period status. Main outcome measures: We compared the distribution of menopausal status and menopausal status-specific breast cancer incidence and detection rates across definitions for menopausal status. Results: Overall, 36% and 29% of women were consistently classified as postmenopausal and premenopausal, respectively, across all definitions. Menopausal status-specific breast cancer incidence and detection rates were similar across definitions. Rates were unchanged when information regarding natural menopause, bilateral oophorectomy, hormone therapy, and timing of last menstrual period were sequentially added to definitions of postmenopausal status. Conclusions: Distinctions in menopausal status definitions contribute to notable differences in how women are classified, but translate to only slight differences in menopausal status-specific breast cancer rates.

AB - Objectives: Menopausal status is a common covariate in epidemiologic studies. Still, there are no standard definitions for menopausal status using observational data. This study assesses distinctions between menopausal status definitions using commonly collected epidemiologic data, and explores their impact on study outcomes using breast cancer rates as an example. Study design: Using survey data from 227,700 women aged 40-64 who received screening mammograms from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, we classified menopausal status under five different definitions: one complex definition combining multiple variables, two definitions using age as a proxy for menopausal status, one based only on menstrual period status, and one based on age and menstrual period status. Main outcome measures: We compared the distribution of menopausal status and menopausal status-specific breast cancer incidence and detection rates across definitions for menopausal status. Results: Overall, 36% and 29% of women were consistently classified as postmenopausal and premenopausal, respectively, across all definitions. Menopausal status-specific breast cancer incidence and detection rates were similar across definitions. Rates were unchanged when information regarding natural menopause, bilateral oophorectomy, hormone therapy, and timing of last menstrual period were sequentially added to definitions of postmenopausal status. Conclusions: Distinctions in menopausal status definitions contribute to notable differences in how women are classified, but translate to only slight differences in menopausal status-specific breast cancer rates.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Concordance

KW - Incidence

KW - Menopause

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955919250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955919250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.04.015

DO - 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.04.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 20494530

AN - SCOPUS:77955919250

VL - 67

SP - 60

EP - 66

JO - Maturitas

JF - Maturitas

SN - 0378-5122

IS - 1

ER -